PostsCommentsPayoutsinobody (54)in #dao-vote • last yearRE: Reflection on the latest DAO proposal and voteThank you for your kind words.inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to SplinterlandsInteresting take. Will look into it in more detail.inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to SplinterlandsObjections noted. But as we know not all have the same possibilities (financially, time vise). It breaks my heart into million little pieces seeing posts in tavern like - need to…inobody (54)in Splinterlands • last yearRE: 🧠 Trust the Vision — and Why I Support a New League StructureEnjoyed the post. Valid points. The product is constantly upgrading and evolving right before our eyes. What I would wish from the team is that they would communicate that…inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to SplinterlandsThank you for your reply and your feedback. Much appreciated. I was an adamant supporter and proponent of the system we currently have in place. However that being said, I am the…inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to SplinterlandsWas a well stated objection by many by now. One possibility would be to redo the ranking rewards to regulate it. Those that get the most rewards would be so or so incentivized to…inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to SplinterlandsAs said its a bottom to top league-would expect higher match liquidity in lover leagues. Higher ones already have liquidity bots in place. And it would be left to the individual…inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to SplinterlandsThx for the support.inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to SplinterlandsI dont except such kind of defeatism. And he did, as is his right, or to say nothing at all. Stated that changes need to be done but that this is not the right way and is voting against it.inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to SplinterlandsInteresting take on it. Serves a purpose, can only lover rank of you on volition, rather than inactivity.inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to Splinterlandsa valid commentary, will take into considerationinobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to SplinterlandsYes my position is that while you can choose a league, you can also choose to demote yourself. But archons level caps for specific leagues remain. Insures fair competitiveness.inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to SplinterlandsYes a valid point i received criticism for that from others as well. I tend to address that.inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to SplinterlandsI fully agree. An engaged, passionate community is what we want, no judgement if for or against. The goal is the same - game succeeding. Already have some constructive criticisms…inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to SplinterlandsWell said. My sentiments exactly- i well remember talks of dec campers back in the day. Exploits can be fixed, people leaving im afraid not.inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to SplinterlandsThx for the support.inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to SplinterlandsYes i seen that, people are vocal about it. The sad part of all of it is that resentment grows and people are starting to act on it. Not good.inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to Splinterlands100%.inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to SplinterlandsThx for the input. I will be processing the suggestions hopefully tomorrow. And have some more talks with people.inobody (54)in #spsproposal • last yearRE: Reintroduction of leagues to SplinterlandsI know of his reputation. Well deserved. Did sent him a message. Hope we can take it from there. If not, as said his position, his vote. No hard fellings. Im not the person to…