Sort:  

Was soll man da sagen? Strafe muss sein? Gerade wenn doch vorher auch noch explizit darauf hingewiesen wurde und einem nochmals die Regeln vor Augen geführt wurden. Das hat dann schon eine gewisse Ignoranz und sagt mir das es solchen Leuten einfach egal ist. Sie kümmert es nicht was mit Hive ist. Sie kümmert es nicht was mit deinem oder anderen Projekten ist. Sie wollen einfach nur die Hive Blockchain abmelken. Leider gibt es davon einige Leute auf Hive. Ich hab auch vermehrt Bots gesichtet die zB Threads auf Inleo farmen. Scheint alles zu funktionieren bis dann jemand kommt und downvoted und dann ist das Geschrei wieder groß und man ist sich (angeblich) keiner Schuld bewußt. Das funktioniert heutzutage sehr gut. Sofort die Opferrolle einnehmen.

Ich bin da in ganz vielen Aspekten deiner Meinung. Weißte, normalerweise bin ich so der Typ "Richte nicht, wenn du nicht gerichtet werden willst." Aber da ist halt eben auch die Verantwortung. Und bei diesem Sachverhalt einfach die Augen zu schließen und, wie ich bereits ausgeführt habe, die mir übertragene Verantwortung nicht wahrzunehmen, wäre schlicht falsch.

Du hast es gesagt, die erste Antwort ist "Aber ich nutze keine KI."... Sollte mir irgendwann jemand beweisen können, das meine Ermittlung falsch ist, welche ich sehr sorgfältig durchführe und gewiss noch verbessern werde - weil die Verantwortung es mir gebietet - wenn mir das jemand zeigen kann, dann bekommt die Person 3 Monate täglich ein 100% Upvote auf jeden "Einigermaßen-Artikel". Das verspreche ich sowas von leichtfüßig... Weil ich mir Mühe gebe, kein Fehlurteil zu fällen. Im Zweifel für den Angeklagten!

Ja, diese ganze Bot-Sache und KI-Kram usw... Alles schön und gut. Ich selbst bin Script-Nutzer und KI-Lover innerhalb meiner Arbeit. Aber wenn die Verhältnismäßigkeit bzw. der Anwendungszweck nicht eingehalten wird, dann macht das hier auf Hive keinen Sinn. Und wenn jemand KI nutzt, um zu fragen "Hey KI, habe ich hier in meinem Artikel relevante Punkte außer acht gelassen?" oder "Kannst du mir aus meinem Artikel unnötige Füllwörter streichen?" (was meine Artikel auf 3% der Länge runterschrauben würde !lol) oder wir einen Script nutzen, um relevante Artikel zu filtern, dann alles cool. Aber das "Soziale Netzwerk" zu einer Bot- und KI-Wiese zu machen... das können wir nicht gebrauchen und nimmt auch den Charme.

(Wobei kurze KI-Kommentare von PowerPaul schon eine deutliche Verbesserung für die Chain wären, im Vergleich zu den ausufernden Ausführungen des besagten Paul. Aber wer macht dann die Witze? Eine KI? Neeee, besser PowerGaul!)

🤣 Du triffst den Nagel auf den Kopf. KI soll Hilfe sein und nicht die ganze Arbeit übernehmen. Und mach bitte weiter mit den Witzen. Die Welt braucht Humor mehr den je.
!LOL

I used to be addicted to the hokey-pokey
but then I turned myself around.

Credit: theabsolute
@powerpaul, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of chaosmagic23

(1/10)
Delegate Hive Tokens to Farm $LOLZ and earn 110% Rewards. Learn more.

I know my wife loves it when I tickle her
She laughs while I'm tickling and is angry at me when I stop.

Credit: reddit
@chaosmagic23, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of powerpaul

(2/6)
Farm LOLZ tokens when you Delegate Hive or Hive Tokens.
Click to delegate: 10 - 20 - 50 - 100 HP

I despise downvotes!

There is an option "not to vote in the first place" or "just ignore a user's post". So, it's the duty of the curator to check the post before curating. For the autovote service, they need to check for the post after a certain period to see any criminality!

Playing an "authority" here when we are boasting about HIVE's free speech on Web 2, just hypocrisy!

Thinking loudly, Paul :) No hard feelings!

Loading...

the problem is that you have also lazy curation on Hive. Those who read that see the problem. You as a Hive stakeholder should be concern if the rewards are going for people who abuse the system. We are all responsible to get these... If you just care about your rewards and Hive stake you can see the blockchain going towards the mud.
On top of that downvote is there as part of your free will the same that upvote. If you don't like my comment for example you can just downvote it is your choice!

Hi, happy day, I really have no idea what the tool you name is, I mean the one you made to verify the content, but it sounds interesting to know it.
As for the people who write with AI and, who ask for votes, after committing an ethical breach in the generation of content, I'm fine with the reaction you took.
What I would do, is not only give the negative vote, but I would also put a message giving the reasons why it was done.
Finally, if you believe that the actions you took are the right ones and you feel comfortable with them, I don't think there will be problems.
The problem is generated, when you make a decision and that leaves you with doubts, or you do it from a vision of power, that's another different thing.
Anyway, I imagine, that the people who use your tools, know the rules of their use or you make them known, so, don't be bitter, the person who commits the fault, to assume its consequences.


Este post fue votado desde Ecency.

!HUESO

Hey Oso, greetings! The AI tools are not made by me. Several tools (I mentioned this in the post). The first 2 persons received screenshots, but I don't will send screenshots any longer or reveal which tools I use - because this gives the scammer just a hint how to optimize.

Thank you for your support!

I agree with you to give an explaining. A lack of explaining is what many people critizise, when it comes to downvotes. That I do so I mentioned in the article. ;-) Plus in the comment I explain that I don't use a downvote bot for now and how to easily solve the situation (really easy: just don't use AI texts any longer... should be easy !lol), that I give a second chance, but that I would think about an downvote bot, if the doings doesn't change.

Well, with the "feel comfortable" with it... No. It's not "comfortable". I wish I could avoid it... But how I explained in the article I have some responsibility. And not to serve this responsibility would make me much more uncomfortable.

I agree 100% with you that my decisions (not only in this area) should be solid (I explained in the article too... well... ;-) ). If I am not sure about, I don't would vote down. Destruction is done fast, creating needs time... And wrong decisions from my side in this area really could/would hurt the wrong ones. So, acting right is veeery important in my view. Yeah, and the topic "acting because of 'I am the mighty one'" is a fail in every case - at least applied on me.

I hope that they know the rules. But it's nothing CCCEO specific. As slim the Hive rules are, "do not use AI as biggest part of your stuff to earn rewards" is clear and should be obvious for every user. Plus I mentioned this in the CCCEO article a few days ago - there was a reason why I blocked new entries for the curation service and pinned this posting in front of the channel entry. But well... some users are just very boldly or not interested in reading anything from CCCEO or about how our chain works.

No, I am not bitter on that at all, don't worry. Plus I understand pretty good that I position myself in the wind with that. But I thought a lot about and talked with several witnesses/mentors about this before they transfered me a larger HP delegation on my personal account. Acting the right way, to carry more responsibility and being ready for wind in the face is part of the role I entered.

And yes, I prefer good vibes & sun. Everybody should do. But sometimes we have to do what our responsibility asks from us. So... that's okay... I have more stressfull things within my doings than standing in the wind against some scammers. All good. And if I don't would like wind or would have the meaning that I would start to cry if I receive a punch back, then I should never have taken this role/responsibility... All good. PowerPaul.

Thank you very much for your support and the dialogue about! If you have any questions about, feel free!

Oso, Hive a great day!

Some jerk threw a bottle of omega 3 pills at me.
Luckily my injuries were only super fish oil.

Credit: reddit
@osomar357, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of powerpaul

(3/6)
NEW: Join LOLZ's Daily Earn and Burn Contest and win $LOLZ

ich war im ersten Moment so geschockt, dass jemand DEINEN content downvoted... #succesfulclickbait xD
!LOLZ
!BBH
!UNI

What's a spy's favourite confectionery?
Subterfudge.

Credit: reddit
@powerpaul, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of sylmarill

(1/10)
Delegate Hive Tokens to Farm $LOLZ and earn 110% Rewards. Learn more.

Aaaaaarg, ich meine ich wollte jetzt keinen 100% irreführenden Clickbait Artikel machen, aber ja, so ungefähr sollte es in die Richtung gehen... !lol

Liebe Grüße! Habe ein geniales Wochenende!

danke dir auch! <3
!BBH

My kids must love to camp
Whenever we go somewhere they keep asking RV there yet.

Credit: blockchainerx
@sylmarill, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of powerpaul

(1/6)
NEW: Join LOLZ's Daily Earn and Burn Contest and win $LOLZ

Greetings,
it is a topic that will evolve with the community adoption of the possibility of downvotes.
The fact that it has been included to Hive shows a certain dislike but also support from communities.
Wise utilization of this mechanism will certainly make Hive the best spot to create contents
Thank you for this interesting action as a community manager.
Peace

Hey Oadissin! Thank you for your comment! I agree with you. Wise acting is needed...

But much more thank you for your trust! I think that I can claim & and I hope that this might be true, that I make the best out of it!

If someone does not agree on this, I would be open for dialogue.

!BEER


Hey @oadissin, here is a little bit of BEER from @powerpaul for you. Enjoy it!

Did you know that <a href='https://dcity.io/cityyou can use BEER at dCity game to buy cards to rule the world.

Hahaha I wrote a similar post like this last week! I hope that everyone at least pain attention in what they are voting. I answered hafiz, and what he proposed it would work if everyone knew what they were voting. In a beautiful world everyone would be ignoring a post abusing the system, and the user would quit doing that and maybe start posting like you and other authors that really dedicate their time writing posts.

You did the right thing, my friend. You analyzed it, identified the error, and reported it. Whether the person is wrong or not, they should find ways to prove their innocence in the face of the facts.

@powerpaul, I paid out 0.738 HIVE and 0.148 HBD to reward 8 comments in this discussion thread.