Nevies ๐ we literally JUST had an argument where you took the behaviour of one woman and somehow arrived at the massive unfounded generalisation that "at least 80% of females who claim to be feminists misunderstand feminism".
And here you are again, generalising.
But you've gone from some women I know have said this to this is something at the back of the mind of most women!!! Lmao at your 'logic' which is just imaginative leaps. You can't know what's secretly going on in most women's heads based on your own social circle lmao.
I'm noticing a pattern here ๐ - I think that's why I think it's bizarre you run a sex blog (so you say) - sometimes a woman doing something stupid is just an individual woman doing something stupid, not an insight into Womenโข - I don't actually think you have many insights at all, just ridiculous, sweeping stereotypess and generalisations you pass off as authority.
More information - Support - Reports - Discord
Support engagement with a delegation to topcomment:
50HP - 100HP - 250HP - 500HP - 750HP - 1000HP - 1500HP
Hmm.
Well, my latest reply on my other post explains that I don't arrive at my conclusions based on one woman or the women in my circle. But based on my observation of society, the women in my circle, social media posts, etc.
These conclusions were not reached through scientific research, though, that had to do with me giving out questionnaires, interviewing large cross sections of women and all that. So they can't be passed off as facts, I agree. But they are opinions I stand by.
There are a lot of things we agree on as regards human behaviour that were not arrived at through the Scientific process. It goes without saying that they don't carry the same force facts would carry but they are opinions.
And because that goes without saying, when someone gives an opinion like that you should only attack it's merits if it is just downright ridiculous and there's just clearly no truth in it, or it is something that in all honesty you can't say "hmm, this guy is probably up to something here".
You can disagree with an opinion but first be sure you're not biased, then remember it can be true even though you don't agree with it.
For millenniums women have mostly had to depend on men for provision, women only started getting the freedom to fend for themselves recently as civil freedoms expanded, so there's no way you can say it is farfetched to say that a lot of women would still have it in the back of their minds that focusing on only getting provision from men via their bodies is not at least something they think about sometimes even though, like I said many of them are dignified enough to only think about it but never go into it.
Women who are struggling think about this at least once in a while. If you aren't biased you can say I'm probably wrong by saying this applies to most women, but you can't say it is ridiculous for me to say it is common.
When I say most women, all I need to be correct is for it to apply to at least 50% plus of women, if you say that is far fetched then all I can do is just shrug.
Also the other stuff about 80% of feminists, 80% is not a generalization. It is clearly leaving out a whooping 20%.
Lmao, your generalisations and vagaries are killing me - I can see why you post in comedy club ๐๐๐
Lol. That's a jibe, but alright. Thank you for engaging with my posts. You didn't succeed in backing up your disapprovals with sufficient arguments, but maybe you will next time.
HHow patronising - but then, for a boy who makes up facts about women, I shouldn't be surprised. I think my argument is strong enough to stand, and aas you create generalisations to support your arguments, it's possible you aren't smart enough to see the weakness of your own. 80 percent of boys are the same, mostly..
Don't forget you couldn't point out the weakness of my own, and I clearly pointed the weakness of yours without resorting to jibes.
So you say ๐
Whoever resorted to jibes first clearly had no other good points. My reply clearly showed you the reasoning backing up the opinion you said was unfounded.
If you look at what I said about how women had to depend on men for provision throughout history until recently due to better civil liberties, and how that is one of the reasons why it is still common for women to think about choosing the option of only letting a man provide rather than stressing over provision themselves you'd agree that is a strong point, if you're capable of any honesty.
Your resorting to a jibe clearly shows you were silenced by my points and had no logical reply. But you can dispute this if you want, and say you had something to say but couldn't be arsed. But I'm sure we'll never hear that something you had to say because the truth is it just doesn't exist. You've clearly reached your intellectual limit and all that's left for you are random jibes that don't require intellectual bytes.