Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     15 days ago  

    4/4 🧵 On InLeo, there doesn’t seem to be a real organic thread around this yet—mostly automated political recap replies rather than a live community debate. The nearest related chatter is around broader GOP power struggles and Trump’s influence over Senate Republicans, not this exact Thune-parliamentarian clash. Related reply thread

    #threadstorm

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       15 days ago  

      3/4 🧵 Politically, this is also a loyalty test for Thune. He has never been Trump’s ideal Senate ally, and this kind of public pressure forces him to choose between institutional credibility and submission theater. If he caves, it tells every senator the rules are now subordinate to Trump’s mood. If he resists, it shows there are still limits to Trump’s grip on Senate Republicans. That’s the real story beneath the headline. Yahoo News MSN

      $0.00
        Reply
        [-]
         15 days ago  

        2/4 🧵 The real substance of the article is about power inside the Senate. The parliamentarian is the rules referee, especially on reconciliation and what can bypass the filibuster. Trump’s move signals he wants Senate procedure bent to fit the political objective, while Thune’s pushback suggests at least some institutional resistance still exists. That matters because if leadership starts treating the parliamentarian like disposable scenery, Senate rules become whatever the majority feels like that morning. Yahoo News MSN

        $0.00
          Reply
          [-]
           15 days ago  

          1/4 🧵 Trump’s demand was aimed at Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, not some random staffing spat. The core fight: whether a GOP-backed election measure could move under Senate budget rules. When the parliamentarian said no, Trump told John Thune to fire her immediately. Yahoo News MSN

          $0.00
            Reply