Treason?

On September 24, 2019, President Trump, speaking before the United Nations, delivered strong comments calling out the bad actions of Communist China in Singapore and in economic dealings with the nations of the world.

Our President also spoke about the malign actions of Iran and he spoke forcefully about religious freedom.

Communist China pushed back by having their bought and paid for American political stooges, Nancy Pelosi and China Joe Biden, demand the impeachment of our president on a day that our president stood on the international stage.

The Communist- Democrat party ploy worked perfectly. The delegates to the United Nations became riveted to the impeachment news and the Democrat- communist controlled news managed to drown out and undercut all of the wonderful achievements for America gained by Trump during the U N meetings

The impeachment claims

Claim 1. President Trump spoke by phone to the newly elected President of Ukraine.

Answer Hey Morons that is what presidents do. They talk to each other.
Claim 2. President Trump threatened to withhold money for Ukraine, unless Ukraine engaged in opposition research against Trump’s potential political opponents.

Answer Do the democrats mean the manner in which Obama, Biden and Clinton sought opposition research against Trump from other nations including Russia and Ukraine?
Answer Democrats made this claim before they saw the transcript of the phone call.
The president of Ukraine denied that he was pressured by Trump.
Answer The transcript proves that there was no quid pro quo
Answer the transcript proves that there was no request for opposition research.

Of great significance is the fact that as the head of the executive branch of government, the president is the chief law enforcement officer in the United States.

The Democrats scream that Trump is violating his oath of office.

To the contrary.
Donald Trump would be violating his oath of office if he did not pursue illegal activity of government officials.

In the transcript of the call with the President of Ukraine, President Trump requested that Ukraine assist with the investigation of the Ukraine involvement in the 2016 American presidential election.
The Democrats constantly whine that Trump is not doing enough to protect the 2020 elections from foreign interference.

How can the president create the protections for our next election if he does not investigate what happened in the last election (supposedly under the protection of Obama and Biden).

The president made a request for Ukraine to help in the investigation of past election involvement by Ukraine.

The president offered no quid pro quo for such help, but Waco Democrat Adam Schiff claimed that because the American president has so much power, just the request instituted a “Mafia” -like threat.

Allow us to demonstrate threats
Democrat vice president China Joe Biden told the former president of Ukraine that if he did not fire the Ukraine attorney general (Socov) who was investigating Hunter Biden’s financial deal with a Ukraine Oil Company, China Joe would cancel a critical American loan to Ukraine.

After Socov ws fired, China Joe bragged on American television that he (China Joe) had gotten Socov fired.

Another example also involved prominent Democrats.

Democrat senators:
Durbin
Murphy
Menendez and
Healy
Wrote (that’s right these guys were so arrogant and so dumb that they actually put this in writing) to the then president of Ukraine demanding that Ukraine continue providing dirt on Trump or suffer the loss of American funds already theretofore appropriated and allocated to Ukraine

We are also reminded of the audio tape in which Adam Schiff was attempting to buy opposition research on Trump from what Schiff thought were representatives of a foreign government.

Claim 3. A whistle blower (“hero”) disclosed President Trump’s wrongdoing.

Answer The so called “whistle blower” does not fit within the whistle blower statute.
Answer The so called “whistle blower” (person 1) never overheard the presidential phone conversation.
The “whistleblower heard about the conversation from someone (person 2) who heard about the conversation from someone else (person 3) who heard about it from another person (person 4).

Hey Morons: hearsay is inadmissible as evidence, because hearsay is not evidence.
A Fortiori hearsay to the 4th degree is garbage.
Answer The “whistle blower” is a deep state player represented by the same law firm who represented each of the following Democrat slobs:
Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer
That firm also advertises that it will pay cash for any “whistle blower” who can provide dirt on President Trump

Crime and Punishment

This deliberate undercutting of our American president on the international stage appears to be Treason.

Treason is the only crime defined in the US Constitution and the penalty for that crime is stated in the US Constitution as death.

The co-conspirators

There exists an entire cabal of co-conspirators who fear that the cannot defeat Trump in a fair election, so they are separate to get him out of office by impeachment or at least to use the threat of impeachment to prevent the president from achieving goals for the American public or at least to besmirch the reputation of the president as a prelude to the 2020 election.
Those co-conspirators include each of the following persons who are assailing the reputation of the president while portraying themselves as holier than though (implying that you are sinful if you disagree with tem) (These Assailing Holier than though types are hereinafter referred to by the acronym “A ho’s”):

Comrade Bernie sanders, whose Marxist Communist pronouncements are designed to destroy the American economy and the following A ho’s espousing the destruction of our economy:
Elizabeth Warren (a/k/a “Spitting Bull”)
Camilla Harris
And AOC

Nancy Pelosi concluded her impeachment speech on September 24, 2019 with the words: “No one is above the law.”
Nancy should remember that that concept also applies to Members of Congress.
Nancy and China Joe had demanded that Trump release the transcript of his call with the president of the Ukraine.
Trump willingly released that transcript.
We strongly recommend that Congress demand the transcripts of all calls between Obama and Biden and all other heads of State.

America wants to know what Obama was promising to Putin when Obama was heard on an open mic telling a Russian representative that he(Obama) would have far more flexibility after his (Obama’s) re-election.
America also wants to know about the conversations of China Joe Biden and heads of state regarding business deals benefiting members of the Biden family.
America wants to know about conversations involving requests by Democrats that other nations engage in opposition research against Donald Trump.

On September 29, 2019 the Democrats began to demand that US Attorney General Barr recuse himself from all matters involving Ukraine.

With all of the wrongdoing by Democrats recited in the essay, we don’t doubt that the Democrats are terrified of a fair and competent American Attorney General.

Sort:  

Oddly, specious arguments will not prevent impeachment.