Back to the Future Day

in #back10 years ago

The first 30 minutes of Robert Zemeckis’s 1989 movie takes place in the distant future – 21 October 2015. Self-confessed Back to the Future nut Catherine Shoard takes a look at its accuracy.

Welcome to Back to the Future day. On 21 October 2015 we will finally  be at the point in time to which Marty McFly (Michael J Fox) travels in  Back to the Future II, the 1989 sequel to the time-travelling classic.  The future he finds is one which has captured the imagination of  millions – and one which has proved remarkably prescient. Save for a few  key oversights (the internet, mobile phones) and a couple of  over-hopeful punts in the dark (flying cars, hoverboards), the world  dreamt up by writer Bob Gale and then brought to the screen by director  Robert Zemeckis resembles our own in strange and uncanny ways. Here’s an  A-Z guide to the gaps between that fictional world and our own, in the  hope that inventors will spend the next 10 months wisely. 

Automation 

The film correctly anticipates an increased use of robot technology:  petrol stations these days are pretty much computerised (albeit not  suspended in space) and non-military drones - such as the one dispatched  by USA Today in the film to take a photo – have recently experienced a  surge in popularity. 

Yet the film overstates the pace: we don’t yet have remote-control  litter bins or dog walkers, and waiters have not been replaced by TV  screens (though automated supermarket checkouts have led to some  redundancies). 

Biometrics

The scanning of eyes and fingerprints is used in the film to check  people’s identities, just as it is today. Yet the movie goes further,  anticipating a widespread rollout of such technology to the domestic  realm. The McFly’s home, for instance, comes with a scanner, rather than  a doorknob. 

Clothes

Perhaps the most glaring error made by the film-makers was in  overestimating how much fashion might move forward. That said, it’s a  relief that the double-tie fad hasn’t, in fact, taken off, nor the gold  raincoat or sound effect-programmable vest (as sported by one of baddie  Griff’s goons).

Marty’s size-adjustable, self-drying jacket has also not yet been  manufactured, despite public appetite, though there have been advances  in wicking technology. 

Dust-repellant paper

For all the innovation, the 2015 of Back to the Future Part II is still a  print-heavy world, in which USA Today comes as a thick sheaf, faxes  spew from machines in every room and the shop assistant in an antiques  store casually mentions the invention of “dust-repellent paper”.

Eyewear

Almost everyone in the film at some point dons a pair of high-tech  specs with remarkably Google Glass-style capabilities, such as cameras,  magnification and access to some sort of unspecified database of  information. They also have bluetooth-anticipating headsets.
 

Flying cars

One of the film’s most obvious errors. Yes, they do exist, but in  nothing like the numbers choking the skies in the movie, and with  nothing like the same manoeuvrability. Terrafugia  unveiled a prototype several months ago, the Aeromobil 3.0, which they  say could do more than 400 miles on one trip. But these are not  currently on sale, and air traffic control plans have not been drafted.  

Games consoles

We don’t see anyone playing a 2015 console, but their dominance - and  hands-free nature - is hinted at by the scorn with which some kids from  the future regard an old-style shooter game Marty plays in the  nostalgia restaurant Cafe 80s.  

Hoverboards

Ever since the film was released, a desperate market for these has  existed. Yet problems, such as gravity, have meant that, while they’re  in production, they are not yet available. A company called Hendo is  working with Tony Hawk on a prototype. Interestingly, Hendo’s website  doesn’t credit the movie for its inspiration, but rather their founder’s  epiphany about “Magnetic Field Architecture™”.     

Footage of Hawk shows a board not quite as sleek as that in the film.  Whether it works on water (unlike Marty’s model) isn’t specified.