Defensive robots are an option for protection... right?
Maybe I just don't know what you are trying to get at...
"Being illegal is OK" or "We should have some kind of Government"?
If you think a Government should exist, I am not opposed to your logic; so long as you also think illegals should be deported or killed.
If you think a Government should not exist, that would mean you are an anarchist. Have fun looking forward to the UN designating a landmass appropriate for people who are not citizens of any nation.
actually you are the one who have been linking government to blocking immigration... Don't put that on me.
Actually that's called a fallacy: counterattacking or attacking an argument based on your linking of 2 things which have no relationship (government/immigration)
For info where I was getting was "why governments exist"
People who enter into the borders of a defined "government" through processes not approved by that "government" are called many things:
attacker, aggressor, raider, marauder, occupier, conqueror. intruder, interloper
But I like to think of them as expirt infiltrators, I have a lot to learn from.
"you are the one who have been linking government to blocking immigration"
Well, I don't know of any private businesses that are up for such a challenge.
And, I don't think government will be providing services to people who don't have an SS#.
I still don't know what your "argument" is, so I don't know what I am counterattacking or attacking?
I will also note that people cannot illegally immigrate from one "government" to another if no "governments" exist. If a "government" has no migration laws can we really call it a "government". I don't think we can do anything about that relationship.