100% correct.
There is no justification whatsoever for coercive restrictions on fundamental rights for ANY disease (even Ebola).
Diseases that are serious enough will cause people to act VOLUNTARILY to protect themselves, as people have done innumerable times throughout human history.
Everyone's circumstances are different and everyone needs to make informed individual decisions whether to wear a mask, avoid contact with others or take an experimental treatment.
The use of coercion to implement a measures proves that the proposed measure is not clearly beneficial and does not have support from sufficient percentage of the population to make it effective voluntarily.
Any fundamental rights restricting measure that is opposed by a substantial minority of a population is not appropriate in any democracy.