So, so, um, the second question is, um, let me, so the question, the second question is distinguishing between strategic public accountability and reactive. For me, I would say, um, strategic public accountability is like how you, like what you do that, um, the public perceives of you. Like what I do that the public perceives of me.
SourceFor example, I'm not the kind of person that engages in fight, but maybe on a particular day, I did, I did that in the public. And these people are made of, public is actually made up of like different persons, people that might know me and those that might not know me. It could actually even be my future employer or, you know, someone that could recommend me to an employer.
So these persons don't know my attitude, like my original attitude, but doing such in their presence at that moment can actually have like a negative effect in my future. So things like being accountable, I am accountable to whatsoever the public perceives of me, at least for what I can actually control. So for me to be able to like control the public perception to some extent of me, I should be able to like pause, or I react to maybe what someone, what someone does to me in the public.
And then differentiating it from reactive public attack. I think this one is like, it has to do with like instantly responding to what someone does to you. Because I've been in a situation at my workplace whereby, you know, someone have been, you know, try being, because I'm actually like overseeing a particular group of people, you know, so sometimes they try, they tend to do things that get me annoyed, like they tend to like, you know, do things that is not in their jurisdiction, like do things that they are not like, they're not supposed to do at the moment.