Legal does not mean mandatory - A story on children consenting to vaccines without their parent's consent.

in #canada3 years ago

image.png

Drea Humphrey and Rebel News reported on a protest at the Vancouver School Board on March 26. Angry parents had learned that their children as young as 12 (no younger SO FAR) have been declared by the VSB and Bonnie Henry our PHO to be cleared for getting the Pfizer Covid vaccine without their parents consent. These parents are angry to say the least and personally I don’t blame them, I join in their anger.

Frustrated parents across the U.S. have recently been flooding into school boards, even taking their meetings over entirely, to demand the cessation of things like forced masking and race-shaming critical race theory in school.

The pretext which the Vancouver School board is using to inject the Pfizer experimental vaccine into BC school children without their parents consent is the Infants Act under which children can consent to being vaccinated with or without their parents consent. Under this act for many years kids have been jabbed with various vaccines in schools without even their parents knowledge, let alone consent.

One young lady at this protest told us that that had happened to her and her Grade 6 classmates some years ago in New Brunswick; in fact the vaccination session (she thought it probably was the HPV vaccination) had been sprung on the kids by surprise and without the parents even being notified.

To me that perfectly illustrated the danger of the Infants Act. If children of 12 can “consent” to a medical procedure regardless of their parents consent the next steps are easily and silently facilitated. Why not do it without even the parents’ knowledge – as was done in the case of this child – and since the Act makes that legal do they even need kids to be informed? They are kids, how much can they understand? Why care anyway since it’s all legal so we teachers and principals and school boards can’t be sued?

“Infants” can “consent” so what’s the age barrier? This girl was 11 when she was jabbed without her consent because her consent was no more needed than that of her parents; she was taken with her classmates down to the school basement and all those girls were jabbed, “consent” assumed. Why can’t 5 year olds consent? It’s all legal.

And, bonus! For injecting this experimental Covid vaccine the school gets a fat special bonus for each child jabbed.

Incentive. So let’s get jabbing and never mind those parents.
Presumably the vaccine this girl was forcibly jabbed with was at least approved after the legal period of safety trials, which is two years of successful safety trials. Do Pfizer's and Moderna’s mRNA injections have two years of successful safety trials behind them?

NO. They do not. They have two MONTHS of safety trials and with that have been approved “for Emergency Use” by the US and Canadian administrations. The two years of safety trials the FDA needs in order to make these injections totally legal, and hence mandatory, are being done on Americans and Canadians. So far the age limit to be a human lab rat is 12 years old, but if there is any barrier to lowering that age nobody seems to have heard of it. And pregnant women are also being used as experimental animals. Are newborns next? Why the hell not?

The US FDA, responding to the growing controversy over the safety of these injections, has recently been very explicit that these injections are NOT fully approved. No wonder.

At least 4000 Americans have died within days or even hours after getting these injections. Reports of serious injuries coming in to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System are in the thousands more (and it is well established that VAERS grossly underreports adverse events) and these include pulmonary embolisms, blood clots, heart problems, serious bleeding, miscarriages and neurological problems which could be permanent.

So what in the name of sanity has gotten into Bonnie Henry and the VSB to inject children as young as 12 with these dangerous, experimental injections without at least their parents knowledge and consent?

How can this possibly be legal?

If it is legal, if the Infants Act really can be stretched this far, the law needs to change right now! The Infants Act was always a violation of the principle of age of consent. Once breach that principle and we are onto the open road to something no parent who loves their child would ever want.

And there are even more alarming implications to schools, and courts, taking parental consent away. Guess what children can now “consent" to despite their parents’ objections? Changing their sex at the age of 14. The courts are enforcing that. A father who objected to his daughter being given puberty blockers which he was told would be dangerous to her health and sterilize her for life has been jailed for objecting. Here in BC, courts and police are enforcing this insanity.

This is vile. This is not the Canada I grew up in. Just give me 10 more years to dream that my country I loved still exists, please. I’m 74. That’s all I’ll need. If Canadians really are weak enough to stand by and let this country go to totalitarian hell, I’ll be glad to leave.