Facts don’t require any establishment. They are facts. Earth is spherical. That’s a fact. Your comment establishes who you are. It is neither about the science or the non-science, it's just about the money. You just want the money.
It is a fact that this post is an over rewarded rant. That’s it. That’s all that I said. There is nothing more to add.
I am done with you. Rest is up to the community. This is my last word on you.
Your logic is hilariously dishonest and evasive. I have simply asked you to prove your claims regarding the science of COVID19 here or at least provide some evidence to confirm your claims about me. In response you have tried to avoid the challenge and simply thrown more unsubstantiated claims as if they are proven facts. The weight of the evidence here shows you are wrong and the majority of people here concur that you are wrong on this.
Good luck!
You do yourself a disservice by contradicting yourself immediately. The Earth historically was always seen as the center of the universe and not seen as a sphere at all, many cultures thought it was flat and that you could "sail out too far and fall off the edge of the earth". The fact that the earth is sphereical WAS ESTABSLISHED through deduction, reasoning, and science. It is an established fact that the earth is sphereical.
You may not like the facts that are presented here because it goes against your personal beliefs, but that's irrelevant. Facts are facts, and this article does provide facts. Handwaving away facts doesn't make them untrue.
It is already estabilished that earth IS round. Do we need to talk about it to 'establish' it again?
That post above is over-rewarded compared to the average rewarded post on hive. This is a fact.
This is not a question about my likes or dislikes. I am simply talking about a post being over-rewarded rant. And even on that YOU do not have to agree. You can do whatever you want, and think whatever you like.
Good luck!
The earth is flat?
Typo
What constitutes a rant?
What constitutes a "fact"?
And do you believe in facts because of authority or personal investigation?