A new scientific study published in The European Journal of Epidemiology demonstrates that
Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States. The data clearly shows that the experimental COVID shots do not stop transmission of SARS CoV2 between 'vaccinated' people and concludes: "The sole reliance on vaccination as a primary strategy to mitigate COVID-19 and its adverse consequences needs to be re-examined,".
There is a world of confusion and counter narratives circulating around the efficacy of the various experimental COVID19 shots at present. In particular, there seems to be a big disagreement in society regarding whether or not the shots prevent transmission of the virus or whether they only minimise the harm done once a person is sick. All of the data I have personally seen shows that the shots do NOT prevent transmission, however, I have heard people claiming the opposite numerous times. This new study makes clear that the shots DO NOT prevent transmission, based on globally available statistics.
Perhaps it is not surprising that there is such disagreement, when large pharmaceutical corporations essentially operate on the same business model as organised crime gangs. When 'science' can be bought and paid for by bribing people from an almost unquenchable source of funding, such as the pharma groups have - in no small part due to their exploitation of COVID19, we need to very carefully examine any claims that are made in support of their products.
Some quotes from the new study give a sense of the simplicity and clarity of their findings:
At the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases i
They even found that heavily vaccinated countries had somewhat WORSE levels of COVID19 than those with less takeup of the shots. This is totally in agreement with what I identified weeks ago, namely that the shots appear to be CREATING COVID19 cases and even deaths!
In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.
A look at the US States showed the same pattern, namely that the states with the highest 'vaccine' uptake, often had the worst rates of transmission:
Of the top 5 counties that have the highest percentage of population fully vaccinated (99.9–84.3%), the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies 4 of them as “High” Transmission counties. Chattahoochee (Georgia), McKinley (New Mexico), and Arecibo (Puerto Rico) counties have above 90% of their population fully vaccinated with all three being classified as “High” transmission. Conversely, of the 57 counties that have been classified as “low” transmission counties by the CDC, 26.3% (15) have percentage of population fully vaccinated below 20%.
The study attempted to account for certain issues, such as the fact that coverage from the shots takes 2 weeks and perhaps also that high levels of cases might drive vaccine uptake in the short term, by including a 1 month lag into the data analysis - however, this did not change the findings.
The conclusion also mentions the recent, large Israeli study which I recently wrote about that shows that natural immunity from prior COVID19 infection is hugely more protective than any of the experimental COVID19 shots:
in a report released from the Ministry of Health in Israel, the effectiveness of 2 doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine against preventing COVID-19 infection was reported to be 39% [6], substantially lower than the trial efficacy of 96% [7]. It is also emerging that immunity derived from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine may not be as strong as immunity acquired through recovery from the COVID-19 virus
The study concludes with simple advice which matches what the data from hundreds of years has long since confirmed - HYGIENE IS SUPERIOR TO VACCINES IN MOST CASES:
In summary, even as efforts should be made to encourage populations to get vaccinated it should be done so with humility and respect. Stigmatizing populations can do more harm than good. Importantly, other non-pharmacological prevention efforts (e.g., the importance of basic public health hygiene with regards to maintaining safe distance or handwashing, promoting better frequent and cheaper forms of testing) needs to be renewed in order to strike the balance of learning to live with COVID-19 in the same manner we continue to live a 100 years later with various seasonal alterations of the 1918 Influenza virus.
I have long written about the reality that in most cases, where you are presented with a graph that alleges to show the effectiveness of traditional vaccines in lowering illness, something FUNDAMENTAL is omitted. The graphs nearly always begin a few years before the introduction of vaccines, whether it be Polio, Measles or any other. What they omit to show is that the numbers of cases was nosediving hugely for decades prior to the invention of the vaccines due to ever improving sanitation and hygiene. As hygiene goes up, viral disease goes down and is the number one driver - vaccines have only ever made a tiny difference at the end of a huge drop and then been given the credit, mostly by those who make money from doing so.
Wishing you well,
Ura Soul
Read My User Guide for Hive Here
You Can Vote For Me As A Hive Witness!
Click the big black button below:
View My Witness Application Here
View Some of My Witness Related Posts
Note: Witnesses are the computer servers that run the Hive Blockchain.
Without witnesses there is no Hive blockchain or DApps such as PeakD and 3Speak... You can really help Hive by making your witness votes count!
Get paid to mine your imagination for the benefit of the entire NFT world:
NFTSymposium.io.
Thank you for your continued reporting on COVID. Let me add this video by Dr. Richard Fleming where he destroys the vaccine, it's effectiveness and the path to pursue Crimes Against Humanity for all involved. It's 1.5hours but will open your eyes even more using their own data.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/NXcLShYKZ620/
Thanks, yes, I have seen that one - he is worth listening to, I agree.
No surprise, but very valuable to have it posted in a scientific paper.
Absolutely, yes!
Huge amount of news thank you very much for sharing this around and I have reblog it as well
You are welcome! Thanks - I am glad that not all scientists are bought and paid for!
Just all of the ones media wants you to listen to..
Time to start listening to the real news these days and educating ourselves.
And I've seen the Communist Chinese party here in Vancouver offer $150 as well as cash bonuses if you bring in people to get vaccinated.
Here's the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology discovering his IP is banned from viewing studies published by the New England Medical Journal - apparently because he speaks out against the COVID shots.
It's all perfectly legitimate practice and within scientific ethics. lol
Wow absolutely holy cow that is quite a low-handed move but with the state of Western academia and the abuse of power endemic in these academic institutions I am not surprised in the least.
However that is a huge amount of press!
The credibility of this organization just tanked.
@vikisecrets, pro vaxxers should read this!
I have personally have the opinion of Covid vaccines being crap and something unrevealing behind it. We are now being forced indirectly to get vaccinated.
Wow..someone either didn't actually read said research or is twisting shit to fit their own agenda. And lets ignore all sorts of other data... LOL
You are welcome to explain why - I literally quoted word for word large parts of it and none of it points in other directions.
You;re welcome to actually read data... and not ingore so much other data....
Cherry picking you mean....
Lets ingore Springers past of publishing fake papers (not actually paying attention to a huge degree)..
The very research you spin for an antivaxx agenda even says vaccines (even for covid) are important... and points that the vaccine shouldnt be the sole route of dealing with covid. Then there is all the other data that shows that vaccines do help fight against surges, ignroes various othr factors, etc. Due dilegence is something you are repsonsible doing not commenters. I've seen your other posts, dont pretend you care about science. I mean really "in the last 7 days "..... Thats the time frame of the data. Wow...great work..
When you can respond with substance, we can discuss your ideas.
When you can stop pushing tin hattery... I dont owe more "substance" when you don't care about facts and science in the first place and cherry pick, misquote, spread disinfo. I also pointed out issues already that you are welcome to actually deal with. I dont need to do your research, but you should actually do legit research and stop spreading disinfo while you pretend you should be offering medical advice. ANYONE who gets medical advice from you are anyother social media pundit needs to get a grip. But hey, you found two pages that dont even take into consideration the many factors also involved in the very issue it tries to dicuss. But hey, you got a faulty study...sorry, another faulty study to scapegoat and give yourself an excuse ...
To be very clear, this data says to get vaccinated. If you actually read the entire thing.And to wash your fucking hands, social distance, etc. It is very clear that vaccines work against covid deaths and severe hospitalization. Its like vaccines work and this study doesnt take enough data into consideration in the first place.
Dr Peter Mccullough isn't anti vax, he's actually pro vaccine, even says he has nothing against these vaccines, they work for a lot of people....what he does have a problem with is the short amount of time spent on studies and the one shoe fits all approach to mass vaccination. They are ignoring an incredible amount of deaths linked to these vaccines. There isn't a medicine on the market, over the counter or behind the counter that doesn't come with a warning label as to why they shouldn't be taken by certain people. What he argues is we've done reach the threshold, actually gone way beyond the threshold required to have a medicine pulled off the market. Many medicines have been pulled for much less. They need to pull the vaccines and get their ducks in a row first. They need to determine which parts of the global population is okay to have these vaccines and which parts of the population will suffer harm and death from these vaccines. The quota to pull has been met plus some, it's time to stop the carnage going on.
I don't think I've honestly ever heard anyone claim that the vaccines stopped anyone catching the virus. I've only ever heard that it reduces the chance of hospitalization.
Not true, they tell people to vaccinate to "protect others"!
I thought that was the reasoning behind mask mandates. I was sure vaccination was all about reducing numbers in hospital.
It depends who you listen to, but numerous governments are mandating the shots to 'keep others safe'.
Sorry, I'm not trying to be difficult, but could you be getting confused with the mask mandates?
I don't personally know of any governments mandating shots to the public... and definitely haven't heard the reasoning about keeping others safe. As far as I know it's always been about trying to get hospitalizations down... but happy to be proven otherwise.
No Problem. No, different countries have used different strategies to try to force as many people as possible to have the shots.
Italy - Official policy now that no-one can work and earn money who is not injected.
Canada - No-one can get on trains or planes who is not injected (tests are no longer accepted for non injected).
Australia - In general the states are trying to force people to be injected through removal of rights (which is itself a crime in any sane person's mind) up to and including pushing the limits of the law and even rewriting federal law which has so far prevented full mandates.
USA - Gradually mandating shots as much as is possible legally.
There is a difference between literally arresting people to forcibly inject them vs simply making life impossible for people who are not injected - but the line is small.
I don't have links in front of me right now but I have seen many people in the media and on social media trying to pressure and shame others into having the shots to protect others. Sometimes they are talking about protecting immuno compromised, sometimes it's other people who can't have the shots and sometimes it's just everyone. It comes down to how much you read on this topic I guess, if you keep reading long enough you will come across the conversations. It may be that they have calmed down now as more people realise the truth of the situation.
The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the person sharing the post on Twitter as long as they are registered with @poshtoken. Sign up at https://hiveposh.com.
There is so much information out there about this topic and so much disinformation that I don't even feel like looking for it... it will be exhausting.
Maybe you have some easy insight for me though: What are your thoughts on the now-moved goalpost of how the vaccines are not supposed to stop transmission or one's immunity to it but are now rather, intended to reduce how serious the case is once someone inevitably catches Covid anyway? This is what my friends in Singapore are claiming as a retort to the fact that they have one of the highest vax rates in the world but are now seeing huge numbers of new cases.