The Daily Curie (15-16 Mar 2017)

in #curation6 years ago (edited)


Curie is a community project with a mission is to help discover and reward new content creators, and give them the exposure that they need. Everyday, over a hundred curators from around the world select hidden gems from new authors. In partnership with @val, @clayop, @hendrikdegrote, @proskynneo, @kushed and over 150 Steemians donating their voting power to @curie's trail, Curie aims to provide rewards to these deserving authors whether they are writers, artists, chefs, photographers, videographers, and more.

All curators are cordially invited to join our community of over a hundred curators by submitting hidden gems at For more info, please check this post out - here. There's a finder's fee of 8 Steem available for every approved post.

You can also support Curie and the authors curated by adding your voting power to @curie's trail.

Finally, please follow the authors selected below, and do leave your feedback and comments on their posts.

In full transparency, you will be able to find a published list every day detailing all the posts that Curie has curated.

Today's Brief Analysis

Today's list polls all posts curated between 15/02 15:00 UTC and 16/03 15:00 UTC. Curie voted on a total of 26 posts. SBD 195 has been generated for authors thus far, at an average of SBD 7.50 per post.

Important: Due to high amount inactivity, we have decided to pause our operations from 15:00 UTC 17th March (tomorrow) if the experiment is to be continued. We will resume operations after the end of said experiment.

Note: All author rewards from this post will be used to fund Curie.
Join us in #curie on, vote for @curie as witness and follow us @curie!


Pretty interesting to see how much more these posts are generating without any whale votes.

How do i get the attention of Curie

But they're not. The payouts are way down. Have a look here or here for example.

Please elaborate? Today's post as $44 pending despite a massive whale flag (it would probably be $70+ without), whereas the post you linked to has $14?

We may be talking about different things...

This Curie: 'SBD 195 has been generated for authors thus far, at an average of SBD 7.50 per post.'

Curie of 2/3 March: 'SBD 1,034 has been generated for authors thus far, at an average of SBD 17.50 per post.'

Ah, I was talking about The Daily Curie posts. Since Curie is participating in the no-whale voting experiment, the payouts are way down.

So I still don't get it - why should I care that the Curie post earns more, when the point is surely to distribute earnings to curated posts. What's the point otherwise? (Which seems to be Curie's thinking too, as they're suspending the Project.)

[Nesting limit] You should not care. :) It was merely an observation about the effects of the no whale voting experiment. It's Curie's goal to not just distribute earnings to curated posts but also to curators who curate them. Creating a community of curators is as important as authors. Some of the curator's payouts are generated from these posts.

Thanks for what you do

I think I preferred the pea :)

Thank you my friend