You are pointing me to a blurry image of something that looks like nothing, on the grounds that it proves the image he posted is not his
- How does that zoomed in blurry section of the image he posted prove the image is not his?
Where is the original source link from the owner?
Posted via D.Buzz
I’m busy, do your community moderator job and don’t play dumb
Again, you are not speaking professional here and are assuming that I playing dumb.
Posted via D.Buzz
Someone points out to you that someone in your community published someone else's content and got some rewards for it, then after being warned they go on and again publish a dubious painting. I point out that they are still doing it because it's a professional painting including a signature, and you kept defending him. That's why I assumed you were just willing to defend your users without being objective.
No, I didnt still defend him after that.
I also told you that, but it may have got lost in the threads.. again, it's not necessarily the rulings I disagree with but the language you use.
Posted via D.Buzz
I agree it seems like he lied and that he shouldn't he curated.
It might also be good to make a specific Mutelist for people who plagerise content like that.
But replying:
It's unprofessional and gives the appearance of a school yard fight vs. Moderating.
Posted via D.Buzz
covering our eyes does not solve the issue, they still milk the pool
That's not what I said. I said "lies again":
How can they milk the pool if no one sees it? Most of the people you are referring to have 0 to no HP to selfvote.
Do you remember using the word "Liar!" to the person in question, after he said the image was his?
I can pull from #HiveBlocks if needed
Posted via D.Buzz
I guess that's true (unless they just coordinate to vote each other - no one would notice since they are only shared in your community and muted for everyone)
I said "lies again", I posted proof in the other thread. Weren't they lies at the end?