SPACE STATION CRASHES TO EARTH..
.....................................................................................................................................................................................
Journalists are such idiots. I can't recall the last time I read an article that was written with proper grammar. I also can't recall the last time I've read an article in which the same thing wasn't endlessly repeated. I suppose they find themselves at a loss for words so they just repeat themselves.
I've been following this for several days. Early on we were told that it was 'gonna fall down go boom'...when asked to be more specific , like, where's it gonna hit they told us.
Earth.
Well duh.
Best I can tell from reading MANY articles (all of which read as if written by a dyslectic person with autism who's mother language is not English) that it's done deal.
The Chinee 'space station' (giving it MUCH more credit that it deserves) re entered over the South Pacific and pretty much vaporized. No word yet on whether an whales were kilt.
"more" here.
Breaks Up Over South Pacific...
Toxic Debris Warning...
toxic Debris..that would be Hydrazine
- Hydrazine is a convenient reductant because the by-products are typically nitrogen gas and water.
- a colorless volatile alkaline liquid
oh LOOK...a new wurd...Volatile: a substance easily evaporated at normal temperatures
keyword...NORMAL temperatures. The heat developed during re-entry is a little bit higher than normal...like..about 3,000 degrees F.
Dunno...is it just me or would it appear that something that vaporizes at NORMAL temperatures (and turns into nitrogen and water) is likely to vaporize at 3,000 degrees and be pretty much gone before it impacts?
I dunno...pretty technical concepts..
@everittdmickey
Thank you for writing this blog, it had me "busting a gut"! Along with the lack of proof reading, and grammar checks the concept of logic was also "thrown out of the window"! Thank you a again for the laugh.
upvoted resteemed and commented
you're welcome.
I live to serve.
It used rain stars from the sky in ancient times.
Beware of these epic times people......................it is raining debris.
Wow what you are saying is able to answer some of my questions, why could our missile defense systems shoot down an asteroid?
rain stars was a figure of speech.
Ohhhh... Again proved
Dont trust anything "MADE IN CHINA"..
Yes, there is definitely no professional work of research and verification by the media that can provide solidity to the news provided ... and more when it comes to news that can generate some impact or concern in the opinion and behavior of the public.
That happened to me too, but I believed it all. That big scandal for nothing.
Good information, thanks for share it.. its interest @everittdmickey
I also have had an intrest in the satilite for the past few days. One of things that confuse me is that the incoming satalite might be somewhat of a mystery but I would think that the authorities had more information on the rouge satellite than they do about the flight path of an in-bound missile...so why couldn't they tell us where the crash was going to happen? Also if we can shoot a missile out of the sky, why can we not shoot a piece of space junk?
Small odds of being hit, but another example of "the world is not safe".
Why can't people accept that fact?