Also, in other news, some life insurance agencies may not cover experimental vaccines, some which may include Covid vaccines.
Oddly, some may say some of the Covid vaccines are not experimental but may also end up saying ironically that they can't cover the death because the particular vaccines were not covered in the plan.
In other words, they may try to say to a person, "That experimental Covid Vaccine which killed your mom was not experimental. Totally safe. But you see, the problem is, it was also experimental which means your mom is on her own. And dead too. Sorry for your tough luck. And she totally died of unrelated things on top of that. ANd your credit score suddenly jumped by 50%. You now must pay us a lot more money. Have a good day. Good bye."
"Oh wait, PS. Just one more thing, if you want to continue doing business with us, you must take that same experimental Covid Vaccine which killed your mom since it's so safe, since it's totally not experimental, or else we will have no choice but to terminate our relationship with you. But you will still be required to pay us monthly even after that. Alright. Have a good good day, bye bye."
Another layer of the Covid PsyOp onion?
Warning about the warning--was Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche’s open letter a deception to further the Covid Agenda?
Rebuttal: The ‘Not-So-Hidden Agenda’ Behind Bossche’s Concern Over COVID Mass Vaccination
In her rebuttal to Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche’s open letter to the WHO, Rosemary Frei, MSc, outlines what she says are “a few of the dozens of clues” suggesting that Bossche’s argument “is a continuation of the overall COVID deception.”
this is a great article, thanks for linking to it. refreshing to read a well written and rational argument that isn't riddled with sound bytes and emotional cues.
Welcome. I am not entirely convinced by her article though.
I think it's good to get all the info on the table, so we can read and consider it. The bottom line on Bossche's warning: to stop the mass vaccination program, is a breath of sanity in this insane agenda. His true motivation, given his background and current endeavors in the vaccine world, will make him a suspicious character. Rosemary's rebuttal article cites unproven scientific medical theories, well that could be said for so much of what western science supposes to be true: Germ theory for instance, which vaccines are based on, has been debunked by leading doctors and scientists of the terrain theory camp. As the saying goes: gold is where you find it. I think Bossche’s warning still has "some" merit and hopefully will be heeded.
Also, in other news, some life insurance agencies may not cover experimental vaccines, some which may include Covid vaccines.
Oddly, some may say some of the Covid vaccines are not experimental but may also end up saying ironically that they can't cover the death because the particular vaccines were not covered in the plan.
In other words, they may try to say to a person, "That experimental Covid Vaccine which killed your mom was not experimental. Totally safe. But you see, the problem is, it was also experimental which means your mom is on her own. And dead too. Sorry for your tough luck. And she totally died of unrelated things on top of that. ANd your credit score suddenly jumped by 50%. You now must pay us a lot more money. Have a good day. Good bye."
"Oh wait, PS. Just one more thing, if you want to continue doing business with us, you must take that same experimental Covid Vaccine which killed your mom since it's so safe, since it's totally not experimental, or else we will have no choice but to terminate our relationship with you. But you will still be required to pay us monthly even after that. Alright. Have a good good day, bye bye."
That's right and helpful information.
Another layer of the Covid PsyOp onion?
Warning about the warning--was Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche’s open letter a deception to further the Covid Agenda?
Rebuttal: The ‘Not-So-Hidden Agenda’ Behind Bossche’s Concern Over COVID Mass Vaccination
In her rebuttal to Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche’s open letter to the WHO, Rosemary Frei, MSc, outlines what she says are “a few of the dozens of clues” suggesting that Bossche’s argument “is a continuation of the overall COVID deception.”
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/rebuttal-rosemary-frei-bossche-vaccination-concern
this is a great article, thanks for linking to it. refreshing to read a well written and rational argument that isn't riddled with sound bytes and emotional cues.
Welcome. I am not entirely convinced by her article though.
I think it's good to get all the info on the table, so we can read and consider it. The bottom line on Bossche's warning: to stop the mass vaccination program, is a breath of sanity in this insane agenda. His true motivation, given his background and current endeavors in the vaccine world, will make him a suspicious character. Rosemary's rebuttal article cites unproven scientific medical theories, well that could be said for so much of what western science supposes to be true: Germ theory for instance, which vaccines are based on, has been debunked by leading doctors and scientists of the terrain theory camp. As the saying goes: gold is where you find it. I think Bossche’s warning still has "some" merit and hopefully will be heeded.
Yeah the whole vaccination scheme is pretty clearly a huge and cash grab at best. Hard to imagine the level of depravity that we're dealing with.
Here is the latest from Del where he gets into the discussion about Bossche and Rosemarie's critique at -1.20.13 in the show.
https://thehighwire.com/videos/in-the-hot-seat/