Oh dear, do I go here? 5G is almost as sensitive a topic as the migrant rape crisis of Europe. And boy do I know about that as one of the victims who was then denied legal representation and was forced to self-represent. An absolute failure by governments, or an act of genocide? An act of genocide, since the Rwanda genocide saw mass rape being included as genocidal rape. Yes, I made that argument in court and yes I won. We will come back to genocide later.
Over the last few years there has been much concern about 5G within alternative circles. I have seen videos of dead trees next to 5G masts in certain UK locations. I don’t put much credit to those videos that the dead tree was because of 5G in that instance, simply because I see many 5G masts on farming land amongst trees daily. All trees are alive. All animals are grazing around it. If there were current problems of mass deaths, I do not believe the farmer would kill off their profits in such a nonsensical manner.
There was also word that 5G rolling out was causing the COVID symptoms. This could be a more believable argument, but in the UK people were suffering with COVID in locations where 5G was not yet available. COVID is a coronavirus. A coronavirus is a common cold. They had the common cold. TV is propaganda and it had convinced people a common cold would kill them. So I don’t believe the 5G was COVID story either.
According to those who provide the narrative, aka the government, media and corporations, 5G has been “rolled out” in many parts of the country now. According to 5g coverage checker it has not been rolled out in many of the towns and cities I have lived in the past. If you type in Manchester Piccadilly Station postcode M60 7RA into the checker, it states “rolling out now”. As in the present. It has yet been fully rolled out.
According to this lifewire article many of the phone groups have launched, past tense 5G in Manchester . I am particularly precious about their use of language as these are slippery little buggers and they manipulate people deliberately through the use of language. We are dealing with linguistic along with psychological warfare.
As for phones 5G phones are available in the UK, at a higher price. Since 5G is still not available across the UK, those who are eating up the propaganda surrounding it and buying these phones are only 25% according to statista . Most are still not buying these higher priced phones. There would likely be no point.
Tests on YouTube show no real improvement on speed where their phones do claim to be 5G
Some phone technicians have said there are no phones which support 5G, even when claimed to do so by the provider. https://www.bitchute.com/video/53Erd1qJGE9c/
I see the 5G masts around to confirm they have been erected for use. I see living trees and animals around them which to me suggests that at this time, they are either not dangerous or they have not been switched on. I believe it is the case of the latter, not switched on yet. I expect, with so much controversy surrounding these masts, it is important to leave them in those locations, to normalise them. Help people become used to them and not fear them. A psychological tactic.
However, 5G has seen an incredibly slow rollout in comparison to other roll-outs. Consider the smart meters. Admittedly they have been quite slow too, however not as slow as 5G. They were supposed to be rolled-out by 2018 however the roll-out has been extended to 2024. Since the BBC article was written, new developments claim smart meters will become obsolete by 2030 so have therefore been a waste of money.
The year 2030 is significant to those who follow the UN Agenda 2030 sustainable development program. Many people believe this agenda is a deliberate attempt at destroying the West and more so the middle-class. There is a belief that Agenda 2030 is a depopulation program. It is written as a positive move, but it is believed to have been written using double speak, a form of language and use of words used in a manipulative manner to reach goals.
An example of double speak you can find in my post about possible harmful effects of psychologists with rape victims called a Critical Look at Psychologists as a Rape Victim. It discusses leading language which is framed positively but it has negative connotations such as making unreliable witnesses of the victims. Remember, this is linguistic warfare.
Regarding vaccine roll-out, we are told by the mainstream media that 92% of the UK has received at least one COVID injection, by comparison to smart meters and 5G roll-out that is a significant roll-out, if it is to be believed. However basic calculations with the governments own statistics, if they can be believed, show this is false at approximately 70% of the population having taken at least one dose. This has however been by far the fastest of all the roll-outs.
So why is it that 5G has been so slow to roll-out?
Some people believe 5G is a weapon. It is also believed smart meters and COVID injections are weapons too. This is completely plausible. We know governments have been known to commit genocides against their own people in the past. We know conscription mandates for wars have seen mass death of populations. That could be argued to be a method of genocide or certainly population sacrifice. So this is completely plausible.
Smart meters, we are told can be operated by corporations remotely we are told. This is a concern because it means homes heating, air-conditioning or electric and gas supply can be switched off by the supplier to individual households against the persons will. It is also worth mentioning here, that these suppliers likely know who their disabled clientele is. They ask if a client has diabetes for example which require refrigeration. Disabled people have been targeted for genocide in the past.
There are various theories as to how 5G could be a weapon. These theories are speculative but may be based on papers. However, it is not clear how much these papers can be believed either right now. It is clear that the roll-out has been slow and it is well known that Agenda 2030 has life changing intentions, whether you believe them to be positive or negative. And so it can be assumed this slow roll-out will likely be extended again. For around 2030.
Is 5G even real or is it a money laundering scheme by parasite governments? This is obviously a question we need to answer. Right now, it appears to be another money laundering scheme by parasitic governments providing contracts to their friends. However, I expect there is an intention to use these masts since they have been erected and those who believe them to be a weapon have good reason to believe this.
For years prior to the ‘vaccine’ roll-out, people had been exposed to the idea that a pandemic was due. This warning was raised by all the ‘experts’ and ‘scientists’ historically known for dealing with ‘outbreaks’. Dr Faucci and Bill Gates, the supplier of vaccines have spoken prior to the pandemic about pandemics. And these repetitive warnings likely helped play a role in normalising COVID when reported on the news and helped with encouraging uptake of the ‘vaccine’ which was rolled-out.
Similarly, we know nuclear weapons have been a hot topic for many years. Indeed we know that leader of the World Economic Forum which is an arm of the UN Agenda 2030 program, Klaus Schwab had a father Eugen Schwab who supplied Hitler’s war effort from his business. Those supplies, we are told, included nuclear weapons. There is much debate as to whether nuclear weapons are real. The argument that they are fake is due to those who would use them would likely be committing an act of suicide as they would surely feel the ramifications of using them against their enemy.
Therefore it is argued that they are simply a convincing bluff. This is an acceptable argument, despite many papers pointing to the contrary. That paperwork could be argued as being part of the convincing bluff too. However, people work within these roles and would swear that they are a real threat. Could they possibly be part of a convincing bluff too? It is unlikely.
Let’s consider however, governments are and have been genocidal against their population. After all, I am a winning example that they do. And let’s assume they wish to bring about a more environmentally friendly world by significantly lowering the population in various ways. Remotely operating the energy supply to households which we know they can do. Killing people via injections they call vaccination, which we know has happened.
What would stop them from using further weapons such as 5G against the populations and claiming mass death was due to a nuclear bomb? They could get away with such a narrative possibly as they may say they hid underground in nuclear war bunkers. However, most cold war underground bunkers were sold off. Clearly nuclear weapons were no longer considered a threat? Perhaps the government found new weapons? What I am trying to get at here is, is the slow ‘roll-out’ because they are waiting to switch it on at the right time? Once nuclear war has been officially declared by governments and the media?
What are your thoughts on this?
Love and peace to you all