You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: As expected from a corrupt Kangaroo Court: Lies, Omission, obfuscation, and spliced edits... propaganda at its best... lying passed by our "ruling elite" as truth. (i.e. January 6th commission)

in Deep Dives2 years ago (edited)

If you haven't seen it by the way. The evidence presented in 2000 Mules is extremely damning and they haven't done anything to debunk it.

A lot that was found in Arizona was damning. They just ignore it.

Video evidence that we've had since a day or two after the election is damning. Nothing happened to the people on the video and most networks ignore it.

I do see a lot of "it's debunked" without any actual debunking occurring.

It is also usually said by people that are guilty of lying and fabricating for some time now. Expecting me to trust someone who I know lies just because they say "it is debunked" isn't going to work.

Sort:  

I mentioned before that the Hearing from today would be very interesting to you. Former AG Barr talks at length, under oath, about the 2000 Mules film by Dinesh D'Souza. I think you should watch all of today's hearing, but you'll definitely get a lot of out of specifically that bit.

I've seen some of that and Barr is full of shit. He lied and didn't do crap. By the way I added a link in the article. People have been responding to him.

Keep in mind I know people that received 6 mail in ballots at their house. Only one was for themselves. What if they decided to fill out the other 5 and turn it in... that is partially what it appears these Mules have been part of.

The evidence for the fraud is actually OVERWHELMING.

It is simply that those who stole power and their propaganda outlets are busy telling you it doesn't exist or that it is debunked.

They seem to think celebrities or people that didn't do the investigations are sufficient to say it doesn't exist when they don't actually know what they are talking about.

Barr and others claimed it doesn't exist almost immediately without having time or doing ANY investigations.

They also refused to look at some evidence.

I can tell you with 99.999% certainty the election was stolen on a massive level.

Did the people you know vote more than once?
Probably not, right, because that would be committing a felony.

The other 5 ballots were for other people in their household... so your friends would need to forge the signatures well enough to fool the signature verification process.

It's not expected that each of the 6 people in your friend's household visit the ballot boxes individually themselves... one person can put in the ballots of their friends, family and neighbours in the drop boxes perfectly legally.

2000 Mules never looked at the ballots that were dropped off in the ballot boxes, so they can't know that they weren't ballots filled out by different people legally and dropped off by one person. It's also totally legal for one person to do their neighbours a favour and drop of their ballots for them, even if it means the same person is visiting a drop box multiple times. There is no legal requirement that only the person filling out the ballot puts it in the drop box.

I've been perfectly fine with my wife dropping off my vote for me because I trust her. I know she takes it as seriously as I do.

2000 Mules also says that geotracking on cell phones is accurate to 12 inches. I asked a friend about this and he said in his experience it's closer to 16 feet, especially in areas without 5G.

I know we'll disagree on 2000 Mules and that's completely fine. It rings true to you and I'm not persuaded by it at all. I appreciate the effort you've put into answering my questions and I didn't know about 2000 Mules until you shared it. Have a good night.

he other 5 ballots were for other people in their household... so your friends would need to forge the signatures well enough to fool the signature verification process.

You are assuming. No the other 5 ballots were for people that did not live there. Perhaps they had in the past.

And no... no one I know voted that way. Yet in 2000 Mules they found plenty of people that did. Yes, they know exactly who they are.

he other 5 ballots were for other people in their household... so your friends would need to forge the signatures well enough to fool the signature verification process.

I should mention I know people that received more than one ballot in their name. Some investigations did find duplicate votes that were both counted.

It's also totally legal for one person to do their neighbours a favour and drop of their ballots for them, even if it means the same person is visiting a drop box multiple times.

Nope. IT is only legal to drop off multiple ballots in some states. Yet there is a limit and that would involve one household and one ballot box. That also does not involve visiting these non-profits and then going to 10 different drop off boxes mostly in the night and always making sure to take photos to prove you did it. Sometimes getting frustrated and going back to take the photo. Not to mention suddenly all of these people starting to wear gloves in the process only after a court case convicted someone with fingerprints. On some occasions throwing the gloves in the trash.

If you just keep repeating what the controlled media, and these corrupt politicians say without actually watching the movie you won't understand.

I do realize you may not want to watch it because of the cost but if you look you can find it. Also ALL of these questions are actually asked and addressed in the documentary.

I'm actually struggling to find any laws in Georgia for 2020 that limit the drop off to one household and one ballot box. Do you have a source for this information?

Do you remember the name of the court case that convicted someone with finger prints? I'd love to have a look at it. I think generally though we need to remember that 2020 was very much pandemic times and people were being extremely careful with what they touched, washing their groceries, etc.