At this point after years there are a lot of people that don't trust the DOJ. At this point if they release the information it'd likely end up being more fair and accurate than what occurs in the system today.
They are not acting non-partisan. Lady justice is far from blind like she should be. She sees party affiliation, she sometimes sees skin color, she sometimes sees sexual preference, she sometimes sees wrong think and wrong speech, she often sees religion. She should see NONE of these things if we want our justice system to work.
The Justice system is very broken in the U.S.
It has been corrupted to a large degree by outside of U.S. as well. People like George Soros funding the election of local judges, and such. (on record and known)
We are beyond the "you can't know that because it is part of an ongoing investigation" excuse, or the "it is classified" excuse. They use that about as often as they call things debunked without actually doing any debunking.
Again, I completely agree, Judges at any level shouldn't be partisan. It's wild that any leader or political party can appoint judges, especially when those judges aren't quite qualified for the role they're appointed to.
I think what you're asking for is impossible. No one is going to release information that's part of an ongoing investigation. I'm sure there is lots and lots of information on people who were at the Capitol at January 6 that didn't commit any crimes, those people would be affected by the release of all information, maybe causing them to lose their jobs, etc. The people who are still awaiting their day in court with a jury would be affected if all the information was released. I just don't think it's fair on the defendants, and it's honestly never going to happen until the DOJ has finished with all related cases.