This is incorrect and you should've just asked.
- Quackwatch (which is some rep -11 account) is not Hivewatchers.
- Cheetah does not and never had a proposal.
- Adm is not Hivewatchers' account. It is an account donated by stakeholders to help fight abuse.
- I run the Spaminator bot alone.
- Most of the users in the screenshot are not witnesses.
- This is a decentralized free speech blockchain; it is legal to comment. Anti abuse projects exist to stop scammers from exploiting the chain and making it look like shit. Scammers = plagiarizing and stealing other people's work, ID theft, monetizing stolen work, impersonation of other people, forcing vulnerable persons to manually run account rings, money laundering, etc.
If you give me coherent questions to answer I'll answer them.
Thank you. Now there will be NO problem and NO question about what happens next.
Just fucking get rid of this loser and the chain would be fine folks!
You replace me then in my other duties then.
Thanks for all answers.
If this is true then rumors about stolen/exploited funds are false and it should be easy to find out who donated/transferred HIVE to adm account.
If @quckwatch is not hivewatchers/logic then why didn't you downvote this shit from hivewatchers/adm accounts? It is obvious spam, racism, user segregation, hate speech, personal attacks etc... This is second time when HV is taking radical left agenda side by doing nothing. Sorry, HW it's a failed project which is driving people away from Hive
Just because someone transfers funds doesn't make them the owner of the account. Your issue with Hivewatchers has always been the lack of communication which just lead to all the misunderstanding.
I don't downvote with adm because it fucks up the Spaminator bot when someone uses it. It messes up my calculations. I have no interest in Quackwatch or any similar account. I'm also not interested in the left agenda and I can very easily prove that, just take a look at https://dline.xyz, this is my fediverse instance for Hive users. It promotes free speech, you can create your account and see for yourself.
Why spaminator and hivewachers are not downvoting it? Why adm which according to you should fight the abuse is upvoting it? Just asking
Today is the first time I even heard of it posting.
Thanks for clarifying @hivewatchers general approach. Now that you're aware of @quackwatch will you be adding it to Spaminator? It has been spamming the same comment over and over again in the comment sections of #deepdives users.
Just for clarity, I have been downvoting @quackwatch for several reasons. One of them being because the @adm account has been upvoting @quackwatch comments 100% on the 6th day and now upvoting these comments 100% more broadly.
As I understand it, @adm has been a shared account that was donated HP/SP to combat abuse. It's not a good look for @adm to be upvoting spam comments 100% on the 6th day. It erodes confidence in its mission.
Thanks V
If we notice the account spamming comments again on other users' profiles, I will add it to the spaminator right away.
That account is currently under investigation. Like many others, it knows how to skirt the line which makes our job difficult.
Sorry for the late reply, did we ever find out who quackwatchers is? They targeted the deepdives and informationwar tag heavily, and also put a ton lefties on their list who actually are not what QW said they are, not to mention most of the stuff on QW list is total bullshit meant to troll.
I think it's pretty obvious who is behind quackwatch and the connection to hivewatchers.
Yep, that's me, late to the party every time.
My last report (berniesanders's spam bot) was ignored by hivewatchers so I didn't even try this time but if you want, you can read our conversation as a official abuse report / I'm reporting @quackwatch account. Once again, thanks for conversation and your time
What the heck is wrong with quackwatch?
What code of ethics have they specifically violated?
I thought we went over this already, should I link you to that thread?
It is spam, posting and commenting is ok but he is mentioning 100 people every time he's doing it, it is just fucking spam. They are paid to fight spam, not to spam
They were asked to stop with the noise pollution, and didn't?
Why would "stakeholders" not simply DELEGATE HIVE TO ACCOUNTS THEY SUPPORT?
It seems strange to create a high-powered account that multiple users have access to (allowing them to act semi-anonymously on a supposedly transparent blockchain).
The account use was in before delegation.
Ok, interesting it hasn't been retired now that it's redundant.