Hello community! This is your mastermind speaking...
Some believe that the West, primarily the US, which makes up a sizable portion of the dragon, is about to declare victory and withdraw from Ukraine, which it very well may do thanks to an extensive program of public lying: it happened last century when the defeat at Stalingrad was falsely declared a victory on the radio because the truth would put the Nazi regime in disarray. After all, the more weapons are sent to Kiev, where there are already not enough men to use them, the more we continue to deplete the economies of Europe, and the greater the chance that the populaces will be able to comprehend the situation and circumvent the Orwell effect, which for the time being still prevents the overthrow of the warring and starving regimes. Although Ireland only makes up 2% of the EU's economy, the first quarter of this year was saved by the fact that the decline in Irish GDP, initially estimated at 17%, was then revised to 10.3%, saving the final accounts. It is not that we can go very far and heavily falsify the figures, hiding the recession simply with ex post revisions. But given that many American companies (like pharmaceutical firms) are registered in Ireland for tax purposes, it is obvious that such a significant error in the GDP calculation in Dublin either renders all calculations made on the gross domestic product pure fluff, or it is a clear case of massive manipulation in fact coordinated with Washington. The actual state of the economy is different: it has seen a decline in the manufacturing sector to 42.7 points globally and 38 in Germany, as well as a more pronounced decline in orders over the past 15 years, starting in the year the crisis erupted.
They were out of time, but how does it happen for dinosaurs that are too big? In reality, the collapse of the European economy was not only predictable, but it is also part of the game in which the US seeks to destroy a rival in order to maintain its hegemony over unipolarity. The tail that misses has not yet received the message. In the end, in addition to the well-known American strategies created in the 1990s, we must take into account the fact that the USA, with 4.23% of the world's population, consumes 15% of the world's energy resources, and even more in some fields, if we wanted to find an ultimate reason for the war in Ukraine and for the tensions with China that have prompted a sort of pilgrimage to Beijing from Kissinger to Bill Gates. In a multipolar world where diverse subjects interact and where the extensive exploitation of other people's resources is no longer possible and, in any event, contestable, this unequal relationship is no longer imaginable. Let's just say that despite producing some of the lowest grade black gold in the world, the US still has to import 3 million barrels of oil per day in order to function since the extraction of shale oil causes an environmental disaster. They steal oil anywhere they can because of this. Washington starts to anticipate the day when its imports will need to grow and with them a reliance that up until now has always been relative due to the US's ability to enforce their own logic on others. Shale oil is already at its height, and the wells are only exploitable for a limited period. Therefore, Washington must now burn Europe to remove a guest from the banquet and drain his energies in an effort to gain enough strength to support the conflict with China and Russia and the Brics, or the Brics for exclusive access to resources, without which the exploitative American way of life would crumble. Therefore, spreading the idea that Ukraine is NATO's Stalingrad will definitely cause the globalist power dome to collapse. As a result, this cannot happen, and every desperate measure is taken into account, even expanding the carnage to neighboring nations like Poland.
British analysts said that there just weren't enough tanks left in the UK to dispatch to the frontiers. To stop the Russians from mastering the most cutting-edge Western technology, the belligerent alliance in the twenty-first century shifted to horses that are seldom ever captured in photographs leading the charge.
Don't believe the lies! The truth sets us free! Have a good day !
image from here
I disagree with the first part of the above. Below Colorado alone are ~2T bbls of oil. The production of oil in the USA is being limited not because of environmental reasons - oil companies absolutely do not care about the environment - and especially not the fake CO2 'problem'. It simply is that if we use our current advantage to consume up everyone elses cheaply accessible oil first, we disable them from having an energy advantage in the future. The USA has the largest deposits of oil in the world AFAIK, under Colorado.
If oil is biogenetic in origin, Gharwar and Marwar in the KSA are already on their downward descent into depletion, and the rest of the ME cannot be far behind. That leave Venezuela, Brazil, Norway, Canada and Russia as significant ongoing sources, with some also available in Africa. If the US sucks up as much of the oil market as possible, the USA then derives all the benefit from producing with the energy resources that are available to produce with. As those sources dry up, the oil reserves the US has left for last become the only oil left, and then become valuable in a whole new way.
However, I don't think oil is biogenetic. I think hydrocarbons are continually produced by the pressure vessel at the base of the Earth's crust, the mantle, and we aren't actually facing any kind of depletion of oil, in a permanent sense. We may be over-extracting it, faster than it is replenished, but I have no way to even estimate production of oil by the mantle, so can't even guess if we are or not. However, it's not a guess that the deeper and hotter we drill to get oil, the more expensive it gets, so there's at least a cost benefit to burning the cheap stuff that is available for the USA.
Seeing as the Ukraine is being paid by Russia to transit Russian oil via pipelines across the Ukraine to Europe today, and Ukraine continues to buy diesel from Russia today, I'm not sure the war in the Ukraine actually exists at the level of international policy. It surely exists and is devastating for the poor bastards drafted to fight it, and the people whose land it is being fought on, and over, but when both sides are funding each the other at the international policy level, that doesn't sound like war to me.
That sounds like cooperation.
Thanks!