Natural Immunity: Nail in the Coffin of the Mandavaxx Covid Illusion & the Propaganda That Made it Disappear

in Deep Dives9 months ago

CCBA510A-01F8-4AA1-833F-D802F9A44837.jpeg

Natural Immunity, the ‘Vaccine’ That Destroys it, and the Crime Against Humanity These Mandates Are - Part 1

“Why, from people who know better, is there so much interest in downplaying or erasing natural immunity?” - Jon Sanders, American Institute for Economic Research (AIER)

That millions of Americans who have recovered from ‘Covid19’ - and who thus, according to the establishment’s own virus narrative, have ‘natural immunity’ against the ‘virus’ - are being coerced through government and corporate mandate alike into taking an experimental injection they neither need nor want, should be enough on its own to demonstrate to the world that this vaccination campaign is inherently fraudulent and has absolutely nothing to do with ‘public health’ and ‘safety’.

If, according to the medical establishment’s own body of research, this natural immunity is demonstrably both stronger and more durable than any alleged protection the ‘vaccine’ provides, then mandating it upon the natural immune is downright criminal. And if there is substantial evidence that the ‘vaccine’ actually wipes out, counteracts, weakens, or in any way renders that naturally acquired immunity less efficacious than it was prior to injection, then the use of threats and force to mandate it upon the naturally immune is diabolically evil, particularly if there is also a substantially increased risk of ‘vaccine’ injury.

Indeed, this is all in fact the case, as this 3-part series will document, and so it is that natural immunity is fast becoming the nail in the coffin of the crumbling establishment narrative; the 1,000 pound elephant in the room that has the power, entirely on its own, to bring this criminally fraudulent vaccination coercion campaign to a grinding halt and help restore humanity to good health, if only enough people will but look at it.

As it is, from universities requiring student vaccination to corporate employee mandates such as the 39% or more of hospitals now requiring injection as a condition of employment for all staff, and from county school districts mandating the injection for schoolchildren to far-reaching state and federal mandates like the recently announced Biden plan extending compulsory injection to 100 million American workers, millions of Americans who cannot possibly obtain any benefit whatsoever from these injections are nevertheless being offered no exemptions whatsoever for their scientifically valid immune status.

C80A6603-82EC-473B-A622-239E5FEFD500.jpeg

Immunity passports have morphed into vaccine passports, talk of vaccination has replaced talk of immunity, and natural immunity has been disappeared from the Covid Clown World we now live in. This is particularly bizarre considering that for months mainstream publications and Covid ‘experts’ alike informed us that our ‘way out of the pandemic’ would be through ‘herd immunity’ achieved by a combination of natural and vaccine-induced immunity, and the current national policy would be mind-boggling if it wasn’t for the glaringly obvious agenda underway to inject the entire population at all costs.

Early studies documenting natural immunity and the relentless vaccination propaganda campaign fueled by false hope and suppression of science

The sudden disappearance of natural immunity from the mainstream conversation and establishment equation at the beginning of the vaccination campaign was impossible to miss, and the sudden narrative change was not based on any new evidence revealing a failure of natural immunity or demonstrating a lack thereof in recovered patients; on the contrary, it coincided with the emergence of studies which, over time, increasingly demonstrated the presence and viability of both strong and durable naturally acquired immunity.

Most notable of the early research was a study sponsored by the NIH and funded by Dr. Fauci’s own NAID and the Gates foundation, among other prominent vaccine-pushers; first published on January 6, 2021 in Science, findings subsequently published by the NIH on January 26, under a headline reading - “Lasting immunity found after recovery from COVID-19.” The researchers found “durable immune memories of the virus” in over 95% of recovered patients studied, “long-term immune protection” which lasted up to eight months, the longest time since infection among patients studied. Not only were antibodies against the spike protein present in 98% of the 200 people whose data was analyzed, the creation of which is by the way the only function of the injections, but T cells and B cells were also found, these components together forming a far more complete immunity the ‘vaccine’ would never be able to provide, for reasons that will become clear throughout this post. And although the numbers of antibodies varied among patients, “95% of the people had at least 3 out of 5 immune-system components that could recognize SARS-CoV-2 up to 8 months after infection.”

Uncertainty about the durability of this observed protection beyond eight months was cited as the reasoning for recommending the ‘vaccine’ to the naturally immune, despite the complete lack of availability in comparable long-term efficacy data in the injection at the time, quite plainly pointed out by the study authors themselves.

“Several months ago, our studies showed that natural infection induced a strong response, and this study now shows that the responses last,” [lead researcher Dr. Daniela] Weiskopf said. “We are hopeful that a similar pattern of responses lasting over time will also emerge for the vaccine-induced responses.”

As has now become a commonly repeating theme of this vaccination campaign, the experimental injections were subsequently pushed aggressively upon the entire US population based upon nothing but “hope,” the hope that they would infer similarly long lasting ‘protection’ to that provided by the body’s natural immune system. Meanwhile the broader protection offered by natural immunity - now absolutely known to be both “strong” and “long lasting” according to the establishment’s own research - was universally ignored, discounted, and even ridiculed as an ‘anti-vaxx’ conspiracy theory in order to advance the agenda of universal injection.

Denial of the science coming straight from the same institutions alternately ignoring and discounting the admitted presence and power of natural immunity in favor of indiscriminate injections for all is quite strong, and a commonly reoccurring claim among these is that: “Natural immunity does not exist for novel viruses.”

Still to this day I have seen this claim circulating on social media in defense of universal vaccination, and it was, for example, the assertion made in a comment posted in response to an article of mine on this same subject written in May - The Disappearance of Natural Immunity.

EF5A82D9-92BD-4E2B-BB9D-DB882E205B5F.jpeg

Never mind that even as far back as May the NIH itself described the protection found in recovered ‘Covid19’ patients as “natural immunity,” and never mind that Fauci’s own NAID researchers had by that time additionally also found - during a study conducted in March - that T cells, a “key player in the immune response to SARS-CoV-2,” both “remained active against the virus” and also “could recognize virtually all mutations in the variants studied,” including the prominent ‘Delta’; which contradicts every premise of the notion that “natural immunity for novel viruses doesn’t exist.”

The importance of the fact that the initial studies establishing the existence, viability and durability of naturally acquired immune protection against the ‘virus’ were sponsored by many of the same key players driving the vaccination agenda cannot be overstated.

But still Dr. Fauci and the CDC continued to hail the experimental injections as the only ‘solution’, based upon nothing but a false hope, it turns out, that the less effective ‘vaccine’-induced ‘protection’ would outlast the durable 10-month-and-still-going strong natural immune protection.

As early as March, even pro-vaccine ‘experts’ such as Dr. Marty Makary of the Covid-agenda-driving John Hopkins, have pointed out that Fauci’s vaccination campaign strategy and predictions that his target 70-80% (to 90%) vaccination rate as the only path to ‘herd immunity’ is a form of deep “denial,” as it summarily “ignores those who have already been infected.” Based on all of the data and evidence available at the time, Dr. Makary declared, in the title of his March 24 WSJ opinion piece, that: Herd Immunity Is Near, Despite Fauci’s Denial.

CDD1D220-E632-497E-8D4C-00B56138D7D4.jpeg

Anthony Fauci has been saying that the country needs to vaccinate 70% to 85% of the population to reach herd immunity from Covid-19. But he inexplicably ignores natural immunity. If you account for previous infections, herd immunity is likely close at hand.
[...]
Undercounting or removing the many Americans with natural immunity from any tally of herd immunity is a scientific error of omission.
[...]
Many physicians believe that vaccinated immunity will prove more durable than natural immunity. I agree, and I think everyone should get vaccinated. But after a year of millions of Covid-19 cases in the U.S., it’s clear that reinfections are rare. Natural immunity is real and shouldn’t be ignored.

Dr. Makary goes on to point out that Fauci’s removal of natural immunity from the establishment coronavirus eradication equation has created a “false construct” conducive to encouraging ‘vaccine’ uptake and also the perpetuation of a state of ‘pandemic emergency’; and even at that time a number of experts believed natural immunity was both powerful and even lifelong in durability, something the ‘vaccine’ can’t even come close to competing with.

Dr. Fauci’s vaccination-only path to herd immunity has significantly influenced the national conversation. ... The false construct does create a greater urgency for everyone to get vaccinated. But it also creates false justification for continued excessive restrictions on freedom.
[…]
Some experts claim they don’t talk about natural immunity because we shouldn’t trust it. But a recent Public Health England study found that less than 1% of 6,614 healthcare workers who had Covid-19 developed a reinfection within five months—even though many of them work with Covid patients. Other experts believe natural immunity is powerful. “Natural immunity after Covid-19 infection is likely lifelong, extrapolating from data on other coronaviruses that cause severe illness, SARS and MERS,” says Monica Gandhi, an infectious-disease physician and professor at the University of California.

Fauci himself, during a phone conversation on December 17, 2020, “acknowledged that he had slowly but deliberately been moving the goal posts” for achieving ‘herd immunity’, as NYT reported on December 24; a bold admission of guilt that he is playing a sick game with the minds of Americans to drive up injection rates among the ‘vaccine hesitant’, artificially setting higher and higher thresholds conducive to increasing ‘vaccine’ uptake, because to the indoctrinated his words are ‘science’, and, as he also claimed: “We really don’t know what the real number is.”

“When polls said only about half of all Americans would take a vaccine, I was saying herd immunity would take 70 to 75 percent,” Dr. Fauci said. “Then, when newer surveys said 60 percent or more would take it, I thought, ‘I can nudge this up a bit,’ so I went to 80, 85.“

But why even bother focusing on reaching ‘herd immunity’ when all that matters to these purveyors of the new ‘science’ is how many peoples’ arms they can force an experimental concoction of chemicals into?

And so, as noted by AIER, Fauci has since then,

taken to arguing herd immunity is a “mystical elusive number,” a distracting “endgame,” and therefore not worth considering. Only vaccinations are worth counting. As he put it recently, “We don’t want to get too hung up on reaching this endgame of herd immunity because every day that you put 2 million to 3 million vaccinations into people [it] makes society be more and more protected.”

Sure thing, Dr. Fauci, and good luck with that magical mantra of yours, although its magic appears to be fading just about as fast as the efficacy of that magic potion of yours...

There can hardly be any doubt that had the ‘virus’ been permitted to run its natural course without relentless injection coercion, we would have quickly reached a level of effective natural ‘herd immunity’ just as Dr. Makary predicted, and would never have seen the mid-summer ‘variant’-driven surge - as indicated by all of the recent studies finding natural immunity to be highly effective against all of the new ‘vaccine resistant’ variants such as ‘Delta’, which we are told is currently responsible for a true pandemic of the vaccinated occurring in Israel, also indicated by a comparison of the data in highly vaxxed Sychelles with the neighboring largely unvaxxed Madagascar.

A28ACE3B-FE94-447B-9477-746BDF888606.jpeg
(source)

As it is, we are currently still operating within a Faucian Covid Clown World approach to ‘immunity’, thanks in large part to the dutiful propagandists working tirelessly to discredit both the marvelously effective workings of the human body’s natural immune system and highly effective ‘Covid19’ treatments such as Ivermectin/Zinc/Vitamin D; with outlets such as the NY Times, for example, depicting natural immunity as far more dangerous than the ‘vaccine’-induced ‘protection’ with a wildly misleading December, 2020 headline, as if the presently existing natural immunity among tens of millions of Americans could somehow possibly be more dangerous than a ‘vaccine’, the long-term safety and efficacy of which at the time remained entirely unknown.

CDCE224C-0145-4EF2-A3F1-BC6855A624EC.jpeg

Before the avalanche of scientific studies crushing Fauci’s incredibly nonscientific theories on coronavirus immunity ensued, many of those being spoon fed the establishment propaganda had already been indoctrinated into discounting the theory of natural immunity out of hand, not only cast as likely being far less durable than injection ‘protection’, but also as a “dangerous new theory” invented by the evil “anti-vaxxers.”

One would be hard pressed not to
conclude, based on the propaganda circulating at the time, that Marty Makary who admittedly wants everyone vaccinated, and NAID director Anthony Fauci himself who said we should “assume [there] would be substantial protection post-infection,” were both crazy ‘anti-vaxxers’, and the NIH guilty of peddling this “dangerous” new ‘conspiracy theory’.

ECB9447C-D45E-40ED-B2B6-98EB5278B623.jpeg

This “dangerous new theory,” cast by Mother Jones as a “pervasive belief” held among those “in the anti-vaccination and extreme holistic medicine communities,” is in fact a long-established key component of the accepted germ theory of modern establishment medicine, taught in every high school and university biology class as a scientific fact of reality; so this decades-old theory is hardly new, and the only danger it poses is to the success of the ongoing vaccination coercion campaign. It has also long since transitioned from “going mainstream” to having gone fully mainstream, with a steady stream of establishment research between then and now further supporting and substantiating the initial research findings on the subject; and also fully illuminating the absolute superiority of natural immunity to ‘vaccine protection’ in every possible regard, even to include extending far beyond those who have been ‘diagnosed’ and recovered from ‘Covid19’.

This mass accumulation of unfavorable evidence in the eyes of the vaccine-pushers has naturally become a constant thorn in the side of their pharmaceutical-driven technocratic agenda, but as suppressed and ignored as it may be, it is still there for all with eyes to see.

Wave of studies find strong and robust, multi-faceted, long-lasting natural immunity far superior to injection ‘protection’ and widespread through population

On May 10, 2021, the World Health Organization published a “Scientific brief” on natural immunity, in which it is related that: “Within 4 weeks following infection, 90-99% of individuals infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus develop detectable neutralizing antibodies.” Additionally, at the time: “Available scientific data suggests that in most people immune responses remain robust and protective against reinfection for at least 6-8 months after infection.”

A peer-reviewed study published by The Lancet on June 4 also found that “the majority of patients had robust adaptive immune responses, regardless of their disease severity,” and this also included asymptomatic ‘cases’, indicating that the strength of natural immunity is not dependent upon disease severity and is largely present even in those who have never developed symptomatic disease.

This further supports the previous findings published in the Journal of Experimental Medicine on March 1, that “asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2–infected individuals are not characterized by weak antiviral immunity; on the contrary, they mount a highly functional virus-specific cellular immune response,” and without the risk of triggering the cytokines storms responsible for so many Covid deaths no less. In other words, the actual science suggests that natural immunity extends far beyond just those who have recovered from ‘Covid19’ illness, and countless Americans who were knowingly and unknowingly exposed to the ‘virus’ without developing symptomatic disease themselves should have natural immunity on par with, if not slightly superior to, the naturally acquired protection gained by those who have recovered from a bout with the disease.

Another important finding of the Lancet study - besides the high percentage of patients who had specific antibodies (>99%) and observed spike receptor blocking (95%), along with “clear and quantifiable” T cell responses (90%) - was the indication that nearly all of these patients had the signs of mucosal immunity, which is necessary to stop the transmission of the ‘virus’, one major immune response not many vaccines induce and which the current injections don’t even come close to achieving, having not been designed to stop transmission or even infection, but only to reduce symptoms.

Furthermore, nearly all individuals also have SARS-CoV-2 specific IgA responses, clearly indicating functional rigorous class switching and antibody maturation. This presence of IgA is crucial for the immunological protection at mucosal barriers, and hence protection against future SARS-CoV-2 exposures.

Regarding the lasting durability of the strong natural immunity widely observed in other studies over the course of the past year, a peer-reviewed study published by Nature on May 24 found that, “SARS-CoV-2 infection induces long-lived bone marrow plasma cells in humans,” which, as Nature author Ewen Callaway explains, means that: “People who recover from mild COVID-19 have bone-marrow cells that can churn out antibodies for decades,” so if you’ve have Covid, “you’ll probably make antibodies for a lifetime.”

As the study authors note, infection triggers the creation of memory B cells which, unlike neutralizing antibodies in the bloodstream, increase over time and, still present after seven months, "patrol the blood for reinfection, while bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) hide away in bones, trickling out antibodies for decades."

061B4BCF-1605-4258-B593-4EBEF5D1F08E.jpeg

The study provides evidence that immunity triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection will be extraordinarily long-lasting.

The study authors note that this persistent ability of the body to produce antibodies does not necessarily guarantee lifelong immunity if newly emerging variants have the ability to “blunt the protective effects of antibodies.” Additional research, however, has found the natural immune response to be extremely effective in protecting against nearly all of the new variants of concern which, on the other hand, have been found to be extremely vaccine resistant.

Analysis performed in a peer-reviewed Cell study published July 20 also “shows durable and broad immune memory after SARS-CoV-2 infection with persisting antibody responses and memory B and T cells.”

“Taken together, these results suggest that broad and effective immunity may persist long-term in recovered COVID-19 patients,” the study authors concluded, another addition to the growing body of evidence indicating that highly effective naturally acquired immune protection will indeed be quite long lasting.

The findings of another peer-reviewed study published by Nature on July 15 are incredible, indicating that memory T cell receptors induced by exposure to ‘Covid19’ likely last for decades, as SARS patients developed cell memory immunity that has so far lasted 17 years, and these long-lasting T cells also “displayed robust cross-reactivity to the N protein of SARS-CoV-2,” further bolstering the journal’s previous findings indicating that functional robust natural immunity will be extremely long-lasting, and also establishing crossover immunity between SARS/SARS-CoV-2.

Even more remarkably, the study also “detected SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells in individuals with no history of SARS, COVID-19 or contact with individuals who had SARS and/or COVID-19,” indicating that much of the population who has never been infected or even come into contact with the ‘virus’ likely has some degree of preexisting immune protection against Covid. The reasons for this are unknown, and the study authors could only speculate as to the cause of this phenomenon, but this discovery does support similar earlier findings.

Previously, the authors of a peer-reviewed JCI Insight study published on March 15, “determined that more than 90% of uninfected adults showed antibody reactivity against the spike protein, receptor-binding domain (RBD), N-terminal domain (NTD), or the nucleocapsid (N) protein from SARS-CoV-2,” leading the researchers to conclude “that most adults display preexisting antibody cross-reactivity against SARS-CoV-2.” This study was conducted in Canada and the researchers did their best to establish that the immune reactivity found “was genuinely cross-reactive and not due to widespread unreported, asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 circulation,” a tough task given the highly inaccurate and unreliable nature of the PCR/antibody tests and the phantom nature of the ‘virus’.

But even if most or all of these people had in fact unsuspectingly come into contact with the ‘virus’, it is still representative of robust immune reactivity present among the majority of the population. Additional support for the likely reality that many, if not most people already have some degree of immunity to ‘Covid19’ irregardless of direct exposure came in an NIH-funded study published by Science on August 4. As reported by the NIH in an August 18 news release - Immune cells for common cold may recognize SARS-CoV-2: “A study of blood samples taken before the COVID-19 pandemic showed that some people already had certain immune cells that recognize SARS-CoV-2.”

Previous studies have reported that 20–50% of people who hadn’t been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 showed T cell responses against different parts of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. To investigate further, a research team led by Drs. Alessandro Sette and Daniela Weiskopf at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology tested blood samples collected between March 2015 and March 2018 for T-cell responses against different pieces of SARS-CoV-2.

“We have now proven that, in some people, pre-existing T cell memory against common cold coronaviruses can cross-recognize SARS-CoV-2, down to the exact molecular structures,” Weiskopf says, while Sette concluded that: “Having a strong T cell response, or a better T cell response may give you the opportunity to mount a much quicker and stronger response.”

So whether from previous exposure to the common cold, SARS, other coronaviruses, ‘Covid19’, and/or other unknown reasons, all of the scientific research indicates that there is a very large segment of the population who, despite never having contracted symptomatic ‘Covid19’ or even been exposed to the ‘virus’, still have some degree of natural immunity that will at the least be likely to significantly reduce severity of disease upon future infection, and at the best, as in the case of the previously ‘asymptomatic’, offer the same complete protection as the natural immunity acquired by those who have recovered from actual ‘Covid19’ illness. And this widespread natural immunity has now been shown to be highly effective against all of the problematic ‘vaccine resistant variants’ now haunting the vaccinated with increasing numbers of ‘breakthrough’ infections, hospitalizations and deaths.

On August 13, Science published its important research findings indicating that the natural immune response derived from exposure to even the earliest strains of the ‘virus’ is in fact “ultra potent” against all of the new ‘vaccine resistant’ variants of concern, including ‘Delta’, ‘Alpha’, ‘Beta’, ‘Gamma’, and ‘Pango’, among others. Ultrapotent antibodies against diverse and highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants, the headline of the research article reads.

48F956BF-065A-4770-9599-EE27BB58B432.jpeg

Wang et al. identified four antibodies from early-outbreak convalescent donors that are potent against 23 variants, including variants of concern, and characterized their binding to the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Binding and virus neutralization tests “against 13 circulating VOCs [variants of concern] ... indicated that these antibodies were highly potent against VOCs despite being isolated from subjects infected with early ancestral SARS-CoV-2 viruses.”

Given all of this evidence, it should by now be self evident that natural immunity is far superior in each and every way to any initial protection that may be gained by vaccination; as the injections are extremely ineffective against all of the ‘vaccine resistant variants’, they do nothing to prevent transmission, and any initial benefits gained by vaccination admittedly begin to quickly fade. But there are a few studies that prove this to be the case, further illuminating the insanity of attempting to force this experimental injection upon millions of naturally immune Americans.

As News Medical reported on June 8, concerning the findings of a Cleveland Clinic study conducted to assess the benefits of vaccination in the previously infected versus those never diagnosed with ‘Covid19’ and published earlier that month: there’s simply “No point vaccinating those who’ve had COVID-19,”with not even a single one of the 1,359 subjects who had previously recovered from Covid getting reinfected, also indicating this bomb-proof protection was durable for at least 10 months.

Although not peer-reviewed, these research findings nonetheless flatly contradict one of the most common arguments of the ‘vaccine’-pushers, that injecting those with natural immunity will somehow boost their protection even further. On the contrary: ”The study findings reveal that individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection do not get additional benefits from vaccination.”

Meanwhile Israeli researchers found that government Health Ministry data through June revealed those who were injected with the Pfizer jab were nearly seven times more likely to get infected than the previously infected unvaccinated population, revealing that “‘breakthrough cases’ are not the rare event the term implies,” as Science Magazine would go on to note a month later.

According to a report by Israel's Channel 13, Health Ministry data on the wave of COVID outbreaks which began this May show that Israelis with immunity from natural infection were far less likely to become infected again in comparison to Israelis who only had immunity via vaccination.

Only 1% of new ‘cases’ were among the previously infected, while at the time 40% were among the ‘fully vaccinated’ or double-jabbed, with that number having since risen to 59% by August 15, and Israeli hospitals simultaneously reporting 85-95% of ‘Delta’ hospitalizations occurring among the vaccinated.

By contrast, Israelis who were vaccinated were 6.72 times more likely to get infected after the shot than after natural infection...

In a much more recent study, Israeli researchers also reported similar findings, and although not initially peer-reviewed, it is currently the largest analysis of real-world data comparing the long-term efficacy of natural immunity and ‘vaccine’-induced ‘immunity’ to date, published on August 24.

The study found that Israelis double-jabbed with the Pfizer injection were six to 13 times more likely to be infected with ‘Delta’ than the unvaccinated who were previously infected with Covid, “and [had] a 7.13-fold increased risk for symptomatic disease.”

Bloomberg was among the mainstream outlets to cover these findings, and help propel the subject of natural immunity fully into the mainstream narrative. As Sen. Rand Paul noted at the time, ignoring natural immunity is “not science”: “It’s government propaganda for vaccine mandates, even those who have natural immunity.”

The premature FDA approval of the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ the day before the groundbreaking Israeli study came out triggered a massive wave of fresh government and corporate mandates alike, all ignoring the reality of natural immunity as if it didn’t exist, proving the senator’s timely prediction to be spot on.

The irrational policy of mandatory vaccination for all forcing natural immunity into the establishment narrative

By September 9, this concerted effort to indiscriminately force these experimental injections into the arms of millions of naturally immune Americans was extended by federal mandate through Biden’s sweeping mandate package via executive order to cover 100 million American employees. The fast acceleration of this march to mandatory vaccination reveals a policy of forced injection of all, entirely irregardless of pre-existing natural immunity, and this was made abundantly clear by the president during his announcement of the new mandates. No mention of natural immunity was made, only calls for universal compliance with this new policy and threats against those who resist it.

The goal of those advancing this vaccination coercion campaign remains an obscenely high rate of vaccination, not ‘public health’, not reaching ‘herd immunity’, and absolutely not leaving you the freedom to choose which medical interventions to accept or reject.

This policy is not based upon science, and it is entirely irrational, unreasonable, downright criminal and absolutely insane. But many are waking up to the truth of the reality of things, as the giant elephant in the room that is natural immunity is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore with each passing week.

"This is a completely unreasonable policy to force the vaccination on everybody regardless of their pre-existing natural immunity," and it is also completely unheard of, medical microbiologist Dr. Michael Palmer explained in a recent interview.


Full interview: https://bit.ly/2WDYpag

There are even more studies that could be referenced, some of which can be found in Daniel Horowitz’s chronicling of 15 studies on natural immunity at Blaze Media.

CNN’s Dr. Sanjay Gupta has been flooded with calls from viewers asking why those who have recovered from Covid and thus have natural immunity should be forced to take the jab. Looking for guidance on how to make the case for indiscriminate compulsory vaccination in the wake of Biden’s sweeping new mandates, and in light of the scientific studies that fly in the face of this establishment policy, he asked Dr. Fauci to weigh in on the findings of the most recent Israeli study during an interview on September 10.

“I get calls all the time people say, ‘I’ve already had COVID, I’m protected,’ and now the study says maybe even more protected than the vaccine alone,” Gupta explained. “Should they also get the vaccine? How do you make the case to them?” The CNN correspondent asked Fauci during an appearance on the network.

“That’s a really good point, and I don’t really have a firm answer for you on that,” Fauci responded. But he couldn’t leave it at that, and once again fell back on the argument that natural immunity might eventually wane with time, with just a little more time.

“That’s something that we’re going to have to discuss regarding the durability of the response. The one thing that paper from Israel didn’t tell you is whether or not—as high as the protection is with natural infection—what’s the durability compared to the durability of a vaccine? So it is conceivable that you got infected, you’re protected, but you may not be protected for an indefinite period of time.

“So I think that is something that we need to sit down and discuss seriously because you very appropriately pointed out, it is an issue, and there could be an argument for saying what you said.” - Dr. Fauci (via ZeroHedge)

What’s the durability compared to the durability of the ‘vaccine’? There could be an argument for the naturally immune to avoid the injection? This is absolutely insane. Does Dr. Quack actually think people will believe this? This is how the ‘experts’ react when backed against a wall, they desperately reach for anything they can in a flailing attempt to maintain some hold on their narrative.

The ‘vaccine efficacy’ begins to wane so fast that the US is already rolling out 3rd-dose ‘boosters’, Israel has announced its citizens must expect new shots every few months and is already working on a 4th ‘booster’ where ‘fully vaccinated’ has already been redefined as triple-injected, while highly effective natural immunity lasts for at least 8-10 months, and this is undeniable based upon direct study observation. And he’s seriously asking what the durability of natural immunity is compared to the durability of the ‘vaccine’?

This is what passes for ‘science’ in Covid Clown World. And this is what establishment desperation looks like when they are no longer actively driving the direction of the narrative because they have been forced to react to an unwanted shift in narrative direction. We are now finally driving the direction of the narrative, and this is what that looks like, like an illusory narrative crumbling faster every day.

It’s also becoming more and more of a comedy show of late, and should really make us all laugh out loud, as the Covid experts clowns must lie through their teeth to maintain the illusion. The inversion of reality really cannot get much more pronounced than this:

“Natural immunity works when the virus doesn’t evolve … when you don’t have a new variant that can evade natural immunity that you may have developed the first time around,” Dr. Graham Carlos, chief of internal medicine at Eskenazi Health, told News 8. “One of the reasons why vaccines have been so important is because they have been shown to be protective against these new variants such as the delta variant, which is by far the most prevalent variant now.”

It’d be even funnier if it wasn’t actually taken seriously by thousands of deluded Covid Cultists.

The Israeli study mentioned by Fauci in fact demonstrated there is no evidence that natural immunity has yet to begin to significantly diminish at 10-15 months when the majority of Israelis would have been initially infected last year, while Israel announced in July that the Pfizer shot had dropped from ‘95% effective’ to just 39% effective in a mere 5-6 months, with a Mayo Clinic study also finding a similar drop in efficacy from 76% to 42% with initial efficacy as low as 69%; and the only thing Fauci could do to make his case is ignore this reality. Pointing to the suppressed reality is the only way to tear down the illusion, and with the overwhelming evidence piling up all around us, ignoring it is the only way they can perpetuate their incredibly illusory narrative.

Are we actually to believe Fauci & Co. are not aware of the findings published by Nature, one of the most prestigious medical journals on earth, suggesting that this strong immune response, which he now admits exists, will likely last for decades to a lifetime, and is effective against ‘Delta’ and all the other ‘vaccine resistant’ ‘variants of concern’?

Of course he is aware of the scientific literature, just as he is aware of his own studies documenting durability that even at just eight months still outlasts the declared ‘vaccine efficacy’ range of 4-6 months by a good margin. He is fully aware and intentionally misleading listeners in hopes that they are woefully ignorant of the facts, of the actual science, the mountain of scientific evidence that tears his argument to absolute shreds. Because anything less would endanger the agenda, and as everyone who is but looking can see, this is about an agenda and nothing else, and that agenda is not about ‘public health’ and ‘safety’ or ending a ‘pandemic’.

Dr. Makary addressed this ignorant, scientifically baseless argument in a US News interview in early August, as there are more than enough medical professionals out there who would still push the ineffective injection on the naturally immune based upon the assumption that this superior natural immunity will eventually fade alongside a “hope,” as the CDC director herself proclaimed, that boosters will eventually solve the ‘problem’ by magically becoming effective against ‘vaccine resistant variants’ if you just jam enough doses in your arm.

As a staunch advocate of these ‘vaccines’, Dr. Makary’s reasonable argument is all that much more compelling, and a welcome reprieve from the Covid Clown World madness that passes for science these days; and it utterly destroys the foundation of the Fauci-Biden-CDC mantra - ‘get vaccinated, get vaccinated, get vaccinated’.

“The notion that we have to vaccinate every living, walking American – and eventually every newborn – in order to control the pandemic is based on the false assumption that the risk of dying from COVID-19 is equally distributed in the population,” Makary said. “It's not.”

And the doctor is right, neither the naturally immune nor the young and healthy are at any serious risk of harm from this disease, and these populations together make up the majority of the population; after all, CDC estimates, if we are to believe them, have nearly half the US population previously infected with the ‘virus’. Makary then points out that giant elephant in the room.

Also: Some people already have 'natural immunity' – that is, immunity from prior COVID infection. During every month of this pandemic, I've had debates with other public researchers about the effectiveness and durability of natural immunity. I've been told that natural immunity could fall off a cliff, rendering people susceptible to infection. But here we are now, over a year and a half into the clinical experience of observing patients who were infected, and natural immunity is effective and going strong. And that's because with natural immunity, the body develops antibodies to the entire surface of the virus, not just a spike protein constructed from a vaccine.

Finally an establishment voice willing to point out the superiority of natural immunity over the injection’s narrow focus on targeting the spike protein alone. And he’s admittedly very pro-vaccine, to the point he argues vaccination may even be beneficial to the naturally immune, but he also recognized the obvious: “Requiring the vaccine in people who are already immune with natural immunity has no scientific support,” and, “to argue dogmatically that they must get vaccinated has zero clinical outcome data to back it.”

The reasonable approach for a sane proponent of these ‘vaccines’ would be to wait until natural immunity begins to wane, if in fact it does, before pushing the ‘vaccine’ on the naturally immune; after all, until that day comes, there’s absolutely no logical, medical or scientific reason to do so. But all sanity was thrown out the establishment window two years ago, and here we are.

The evidence that flies in the face of this indiscriminate mandavaxx madness is overwhelming, the propaganda vile, the level of denial deeply disturbing, and the thinking driving this agenda insanely nonscientific to the extreme.

According to the CDC estimates coming straight from the agency we are told to trust and the actual science coming from the medical establishment we are supposed to trust, there were some 120 million US Covid cases and therefore 120 million Americans who had developed natural immunity by May, 2021, when the vaccination coercion campaign really began to kick into high gear.

8551BEEB-50E1-4983-8A64-EAAD23B50A80.jpeg
2C3ADB57-0F37-414A-9EF1-B9E2E075B7DA.jpeg

I am certainly not advising that one blindly trust the numbers coming from an agency with such a long history of manipulating such data to its own ends, but am simply pointing out the hypocrisy and fraudulent nature of attempting to force this injection on approximately 120 million Americans who, according to the official CDC estimates and a large, convincing body of peer-reviewed establishment scientific literature, have a robust and durable natural immune protection that the injection is demonstrably unable to provide. Even according to the official case count, there must be at least 40 million Americans with natural immunity, and that is a full half the number of remaining eligible Americans who, as of the Biden mandate package announcement, remained steadfast in their rejection of this injection.

This is downright criminal fraud, that much is clear for all to see. This fraud becomes all that much more disturbing, however, in light of the fact that evidence suggests this nonscientific injection coercion campaign is additionally harmful to the tens of millions of naturally immune Americans who get the jab in more ways than one. And that will be the subject of coming posts, so stay tuned for the continuation of this investigation.

Having first seen, though, from within the framework of the establishment’s own virus narrative, the level of deception, manipulation, and science denial the pharmaceutical driven Covid1984 mandavaxxers are willing to employ to advance their tyrannical agenda, one may at last be ready and willing to consider the possibility that all of this madness was conceived by a corrupt medical-political establishment which hoodwinked the world into running scared from a phantom virus, the emergence of which just so happened to magically coincide with the mysterious disappearance of the flu.

Natural immunity wasn’t the only thing to mysteriously disappear from the world stage with the sudden rise of the Covid Clown World of madness we now find ourselves in, but it is one thing that has the power all on its own to bring this empire of lies crashing down to the ground. Indeed, our freedom and the future of humanity seems to very much depend on it.

Sort:  

Superb, long but superb. Must have taken some time putting this together.
Thanks for the read.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Excellent piece, @jasonliberty, reblogged.

Thanks for this post. Honestly not certain I will make it through the whole thing, but I've read a fair bit so far and it's bang on.

“Natural immunity does not exist for novel viruses.”
I actually haven't seen that said, but I think I see where that person went wrong. When they say "natural immunity" what they mean is "passive natural immunity"... like being immune to a pathogen because your mother (who breastfed you) had immunity to it. If they had said that, they would have been more correct.
But when we say natural immunity, we're talking about active natural immunity, where our B and T cells are involved to fight the pathogen, and "remember" it in case they see it again. That most certainly does exist for novel viruses, and all viruses.
People really need to understand their terms before making such statements!
I would know, as would my wife and son. We had Covid in Feb-Apr 2020. My son wasn't even 6 months old yet, and therefore did not have an immune system, but we got him through it and by spring he was able to beat it. I'm a bit older and already have "long Covid" since 2016 (all the same symptoms but obviously not that diagnosis), so I did have some lingering side effects long after the initial infection. But we haven't had any issues for well over a year. Not even a cold. We take C, D, Zinc, and some other supplements, and we eat a healthy plant based diet. We see others like us regularly for socialization and activism. None of them have been sick lately either. None of us mask, none of us are vaccinated, none of us distance or isolate. I don't know how long this immunity lasts, but we're perfectly fine at the moment. Covid is supposedly making the rounds again in nursing homes and such, but that's what the flu does, it picks off people near death. Sad but true, always been that way. Those of us who had Covid are immune, at least for now. And if we get exposed again, which we probably already have, we'll either not notice it at all, or just have a much milder version than last time, even if it's has "mutated" since then.
We're the healthy ones. For them to come at us to remove that natural immunity is, as you say, illogical, immoral, and criminal.

A vaccine triggers your immune system to build a defense against a MILD CASE OF THE INFECTION.​

A vaccine, and even the mRNA medicines don't "attack the covidz".​


They trigger your own body to manufacture MEMORY B CELLS that can quickly identify the covidz.​

This does not PREVENT INFECTION, but rather reduces the impact of the infection.​

In other words,​

An ideal vaccine will give you exactly the same level of immunity as an ASYMPTOMATIC INFECTION (which apparently everyone has already had because the media reports this thing spreads like wild fire and you can't tell if you have it or not).​

image.png

There are several potential reasons that memory B cells produced by natural infection might be expected to outperform those produced by mRNA vaccines, the researchers say.

It is possible that the body responds differently to viruses that enter through the respiratory tract than those that are injected into our upper arms. Or perhaps an intact virus goads the immune system in a way that the lone spike protein represented by the vaccines simply cannot. Then again, maybe it’s that the virus persists in the naturally infected for weeks, giving the body more time to mount a robust response. The vaccine, on the other hand, is flushed out of the body mere days after triggering the desired immune response.

Regardless of the cause, the implications are clear. We can expect memory B cells to undergo limited volleys of evolution in response to mRNA vaccines, a finding that may have significant implications for the design and rollout of booster shots. A booster with the currently available mRNA vaccine would be expected to engage memory cells to produce circulating antibodies that are strongly protective against the original virus and somewhat less so against the variants, Nussenzweig says.

https://www.rockefeller.edu/news/30919-natural-infection-versus-vaccination-differences-in-covid-antibody-responses-emerge/