(source)
The way vaccines are supposed to work, we are taught, is by inducing within the body the creation of the antibodies for the virus the patient is being inoculated against. Things seem to be working a little backwards with the new experimental ‘Covid19’ injections, however, which instead “wipes out” ‘Covid19’ antibodies in those who have recovered from the so-called virus, according to The Red Cross at the end of February.
“The Red Cross says anyone who has received their COVID-19 vaccine cannot donate convalescent plasma to help other COVID-19 patients in hospitals,” a mainstream news anchor reported. “That plasma is made up of antibodies from people who have recovered from the virus, but the vaccine wipes out those antibodies, making the convalescent plasma ineffective at treating other COVID-19 patients.”
I don’t have time to hunt down the original source for the quote as this news story appears to be highly suppressed in search engine results, but you can hear the shocking admission for yourself in the intro to the latest Daily Wrap Up show on The Last American Vagabond.
The announcement came as the organization stressed that the need for blood and plasma donors remained high.
“The Red Cross said vaccinated people can't donate plasma because the shot counteracts existing antibodies,” Komu 8 News reported on February 28.
Like the strong evidence establishing a clear pattern of increased deaths attributed to ‘Covid19’ in the weeks following vaccination, such news is naturally not supportive of the establishment ‘vaccine’ narrative, so it might not come as too much of a surprise, then, that the Red Cross soon conveniently amended its COVID-19 blood donor page to reflect that it had “discontinued dedicated COVID-19 convalescent plasma donations on March 26 due to declining hospital demand and sufficient industry supply.”
If it was bad optics for the vaccination agenda to reject plasma only from vaccine recipients, surely rejecting the plasma donations altogether would solve that problem. If we are to believe it, apparently the high demand was already sufficiently declining in less than a month to warrant the discontinuing of the Red Cross program, despite an increased number of vaccinated people diminishing the number of eligible donors.
The Red Cross donor page update nevertheless still makes it abundantly clear that it cannot accept convalescent plasma from ‘Covid19’ vaccine recipients, inferring that plasma from those who have received an experimental injection will not generally be able to “test positive for higher-levels of antibodies,” because “antibodies from natural infections and antibodies from a vaccine are not the same.”
One of the Red Cross requirements for plasma from routine blood and platelet donations that test positive for high-levels of antibodies to be used as convalescent plasma is that it must be from a donor that has not received a COVID-19 vaccine. This is to ensure that antibodies collected from donors have sufficient antibodies directly related to their immune response to a COVID-19 infection and not just the vaccine, as antibodies from an infection and antibodies from a vaccine are not the same.
One would surely not be crazy to question if the reason for this is because the injections are not creating antibodies at all, but rather a spike protein that research is increasingly showing to be harmful and the cause of many of the widely reported adverse effects being observed by recipients, and quite possibly also responsible for ‘wiping out’ the naturally-induced antibodies.
Despite referencing a February 12 revision to FDA guidelines to allow vaccinated patients to donate plasma, the Red Cross stressed that it cannot do so for the above-stated reasons, which illuminates a clear discrepancy between the FDA guidelines in support of the establishment narrative and vaccination agenda, and the reality of the situation on the ground among recovering patients and the medical professionals directly caring for them.
The Red Cross donor page as it was before the March 26 update is archived and available to view here, and to this day The Red Cross will not accept convalescent plasma from individuals who have received the experimental ‘Covid19’ injection.
The evidence The Red Cross is privy to, that these injections “wipe out” the antibodies in patients recovering from ‘Covid19’, is particularly relevant and a little disturbing given the current establishment push for people who have recovered from the ‘virus’ to get the shot, and directly challenges the CDC case for why those who have recovered from the disease (and are said to have antibodies that could last anywhere from four months to life), should still take the experimental injection. Obviously, if the disease being called ‘Covid19’ is indeed caused by a novel coronavirus as we are told, and the experimental injection actually wipes out the naturally developed antibodies against that virus as the Red Cross and mainstream media outlets reported, then it is clearly counterproductive for anyone who has recovered from ‘Covid19’ to take the shot. It would seem that instead of creating stronger protection against the ‘virus’ in recovered patients, the injection will actually be eradicating whatever immunity the body had naturally developed.
Considering the low risk that ‘Covid19’, (whatever it is) poses to the population according to the official numbers, and the fact that the novel ‘virus’ the ‘vaccine’ is said to protect against still hasn’t been isolated and thus proven to exist, the far more important issue at hand is the documented harm being caused by these injections and the mounting evidence indicating that the spike protein produced by all ‘Covid19’ injections is directly responsible for a majority of the vaccine injuries. Knowing how the spike protein can adversely effect the body can help us better understand the cause of a wide variety of vaccine injuries being experienced and reported by recipients, including heart failure and blood clotting, strokes, neurological damage, and even disease being diagnosed as ‘Covid19’.
The spike protein is supposed to mimic the ‘virus’ and in this way induce the creation of the antibodies in the body before disappearing, but is instead lingering and spreading throughout the body, building up in the reproductive organs, and even crossing the blood-brain barrier to cause neurological damage, the evidence suggests. And now a number of medical professionals are speaking out about this - all being ignored, suppressed and censored by the establishment media and Big Tech in favor of the ‘safe and effective’ mainstream mantra.
The video in the above tweet is from an illuminating interview with Dr. Byram Bridle, an Associate Professor on Viral Immunology at the University of Guelph, about a number of new peer-reviewed studies that suggest there may be many serious adverse effects specifically caused by the spike protein including heart inflammation, VITT, and other serious health issues in those who receive the experimental injection.
And then in the video below, Dr. Sherry Tenpenny also gives a brief explanation as to how the spike protein created by these experimental injections is responsible for causing so many of the injuries being experienced and reported by recipients:
That the spike protein builds up specifically in the reproductive organs also suggests this could be the cause of miscarriages and other reproductive system interruptions reported by many vaccinated women, and is cause for concern in regards to the potential for infertility being caused by these injections in the vaccinated.
Recent in-depth video report covering a massive amount of research on this subject by @tlavagabond, complete with all original links and sources, can be seen at The Last American Vagabond website - Infertility Risks Of COVID-19 Injections, Spike Protein Shedding & Pfizer Is Self-Amplifying.
As has become abundantly clear, there is something terribly wrong with this vaccination campaign, and the red flags are everywhere one turns, the evidence literally staring us in our faces.
The latest VAERS data shows a total of 294,801 reports of adverse events following injection, including 5,165 deaths and 25,359 serious injuries, with an increasing number of child injuries including death being reported since the premature FDA authorization for use in children ages 12-17. Considering that children literally sit at a zero risk of serious injury from ‘Covid19’, the mad rush to inject the youth - even without parental consent and complete with a host of bribes specifically targeting children and teens - is incredibly disturbing.
With anaphylaxis, blood clotting, and strokes all positively identified as deadly adverse effects of these injections, the CDC also currently investigating an increasing number of reports of heart inflammation in children following injection, and a steadily increasing number of the ‘fully vaccinated’ being diagnosed and dying with ‘Covid19’, only those with the sole purpose of advancing an agenda at the expense of the truth could possibly continue to insist these shots are totally safe and effective. And yet that is exactly what the entire Covid1984 establishment continues to do, ironically in the name of public health and safety - your health, safety, and freedom a sacrifice they are willing to make to increase their corporate profit and control over humanity.
Covid 19 has done to humanity more harm than good I believe it is time, humans are free from this so called virus
It's wild how they have redefined what a vaccine is, to try and sell it to people who don't need it. I have antibodies because my immune system beat COVID. I do no need the vaccine, at least not as vaccines are supposed to work. I also don't want to kill the antibodies I currently have.
check this out:
https://ayavela.medium.com/we-are-in-the-middle-of-an-information-war-9ae376cfbcf9
I just got it this morning from another blog post in the comments.
I hope this link works. It's an interview with the NYU professor who taught his students about propaganda, last year trying to use mask propaganda to illustrate it. He got SLAMMED for it, accused of microaggressions, hate speech and other totally false actions. Pretty shocking how many people participated in this. The Covid con is very sophisticated, and has been in the making for a very long time. Those who try to expose it, even passively such as this professor did, risk everything.
Thanks, watched the video, it was very informative as to the extent of suppression of any dissent whatsoever at all. They definitely planned this from way back, at least since 9/11, though I don’t think they anticipated the number of doctors speaking out.
Is the "cure" going to be worse than the disease? It sounds like it, but I hope not. Mankind has been damaged enough over this "COVID-19".
Ffs. What next, my friends neighbor's brother who is a plumber knows this guy who heard that blah blah blah....?
I sourced it, check the video link and you will see for yourself I didn’t make it up, but was reported by mainstream news, I just couldn’t find the original video, but I linked to a copy so you can verify the news for yourself, and I linked to another news article saying almost exactly the same - ‘counteracts antibodies’. When videos are suppressed in search results and removed from platforms, I think linking to an available copy of the video archived online by researchers constitutes sourcing the work, sorry I couldn’t find the original, but thank goodness others did at the time and saved copies for the world to see. If I didn’t have the video footage, I would not have used the quote.
The comment shows that it is not about reliable sources or science. It is just very cheekily demanded of those who oppose the common narrative as some kind of right to demand watertightness. But you can cite a thousand doctors, hundreds of sources, or point to scientific texts from before or after 2020, it doesn't matter at all, because if you want to believe the story, you believe it.
Apologising for missing original sources? After you have collected such a wealth of material on your blog, written extensively on the subject and the only sentence that offends the commentator is an uncertainty in your wording?
I guess this can only be solved with humour or ignored.
A man and a fool meet. Says the man, "You can't prove there is no Corona!" The fool laughingly replies, "Indeed, indeed. I cannot prove it, my friend, I will die or not die, and remain a fool, while you insist on not being a fool and that is why you outdo me!"
So we don't have a source for the quote in your title, "vaccine wipes out COVID antibodies"?
That's a huge claim, so I'd really like to know what backs it up!
See the video link right after the quote, it’s the opening clip of the show, mainstream news anchor, I did link to a source, just not original video which I could not find, and I have same news linked below that in another source, worded slightly different, but saying the same - ‘counteracts antibodies’.
I think you're right that people who have recovered from the virus should not be "vaccinated" against it. I've been saying that and advocating for that all along. As a biologist and nurse it is what makes the most sense to me.
But I'd really like to find some evidence that the Red Cross has acknowledged the vaccines destroy natural immunity. That would be absolutely huge! Like you, I've had a look, and I can't find anything to support that claim, other than the brief clip that sounds like a female mainstream media news reporter. The Red Cross denies that is their stance, and specifically says they welcome donations from "vaccine" recipients, even the next day after receiving it, inviting donors to bring their "vaccination" status card with them. Perhaps they aren't using that blood for convalescent plasma therapy, I don't know.
If they've changed their official viewpoint and tried to hide their original announcement, surely there's still some record of it. We all know that once something hits the internet, it can never be removed. It's gotta be available. Somebody would have been able to find it by now.
Also, where's the original news report? How could that also have been disappeared and leaving no evidence?
It it really happened, there's got to be something... other than a single unsourced anonymous voice clip.
We could get an unsourced anonymous voice clip that says Bill Gates has admitted the "vaccines" are a depopulation plan. But without knowing where that clip comes from, and with Bill Gates himself publicly denying that's what he said, and no evidence that he said it, what do we do? Clearly, the info (the "vaccines" are about depopulation) is true, but did Bill Gates admit (and then retract) it? Did the Red Cross admit (and then retract) that Covid "vaccines" destroy natural immunity?
Good point, I’ll hunt deeper when I have time, but the fact we do have local NBC news affiliate (I believe NBC from the logo) stating the Red Cross said it ‘counteracts antibodies’ is good indication they originally refused to accept plasma for reasons along these lines. They still refuse the convalescent plasma for recovering patients to this day, only accepting blood and other plasma from the ‘vaccinated’. Whatever the reason, there clearly is one, and ‘counteracting antibodies’ seems much the same in effect to me as ‘wiping out antibodies’, either way rendering them useless. I’ve found multiple copies of the clip, from what I can tell it may be from RT, but I will look deeper. That clip aside, the other news report is equally disturbing to me saying essentially the same in different words, although the language is not quite as shell shocking. I’ll let you know if I find more details.
Okay, thank you. Same.
Like I said, I'm nearly certain naturally immune people should stay even further away from these "vaccines" than anyone else. An organization like the Red Cross would have to be on top of things like this, so what they do and say is noteworthy. I think we're edging closer to the truth all the time, and a lot of smart people are looking at this exact issue, so clarity can't be far off. Then again, there are always new curveballs being created and thrown at us.