BREONNA TAYLOR - We've been brainwashed again. On both sides.
I normally try and steer-clear of any "topic of the week" and I didn't even look into any of this until today.
I just thought, "cops killed somebody and some people think it was justified and some people don't" it seems like "facts-don't-matter" anymore, so who cares?
CONCLUSIONS.
THIS IS A MASSIVE FAILURE OF INTELLIGENCE.
THE PATRIOT ACT GIVES POLICE VAST, SWEEPING, AND VIRTUALLY UNFETTERED SURVEILLANCE POWERS.
(IFF) THE POLICE HAD NARROWED THE SUSPECT'S LOCATION TO ONLY 2 LIKELY LOCATIONS, WHY DID THEY NOT SIMPLY WAIT FOR THE SUSPECT TO WALK OUTSIDE INTO AN AMBUSH? OR WHY DID THEY NOT SIMPLY PLACE A TRACKER ON THEIR VEHICLE AND AMBUSH THEM (IN PLAINCLOTHES) AS THEY CARRY GROCERIES BACK TO THEIR CAR?
AND IF 3 GUYS IN PLAINCLOTHES STARTED BANGING ON MY DOOR IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT YELLING "THIS IS THE POLICE" I WOULDN'T BELIEVE THEM.
PRO TIP: I'VE SEEN THIS HAPPEN AND IT WASN'T "THE POLICE" AT ALL.
Here are the REAL-TRUE-FACTS.
BREONNA TAYLOR = INNOCENT
KENNETH WALKER = INNOCENT
JONATHAN MATTINGLY = INNOCENT
BRETT HANKISON = INNOCENT (of manslaughter)
MYLES COSGROVE = INNOCENT
How the FUCK can they all be innocent you ask??
It's a simple matter of brainwashing.
Imagine a blind intersection.
Now imagine that automobile accidents happen at this blind intersection.
All the time.
Every year 300 people die at this blind intersection.
WHO DO YOU BLAME FOR THE ACCIDENT(S)??
YOU ARE BRAINWASHED TO ALWAYS BLAME THE DRIVER(S).
Nobody ever seems to ask, "who designed this idiotic blind intersection?"
We're brainwashed to believe there is always a human, directly involved with the "accident" that "should have" somehow "acted differently" and is somehow "morally inferior" and worthy of blame and "deserves" to be punished or even crippled (or killed).
"well, she shouldn't have been friends with a drug-dealer" I've actually heard someone say.
In some "rare" cases we say "both drivers were at-fault" but NEVER DO WE EVEN CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITY THAT NONE WERE AT-FAULT.
THERE MUST BE A "GOOD GUY" AND A "BAD GUY".
THERE MUST BE A "HERO" AND THERE MUST BE A "VILLIAN".
REAL-TRUE-FACTS:
12:40 AM MARCH 13TH 2020 - three plainclothes officers serve a no-knock warrant.
FULL STOP.
WHY??
Because Breonna Taylor was listed as a telephone contact and her apartment's mailing address was listed by Jamarcus Glover who was currently under investigation and wanted by police. Spoiler alert: Jamarcus Glover was actually arrested (10 miles away, at his home) at almost the exact same time that Breonna Taylor was shot to death.
Detective Joshua Jaynes, who obtained the search warrant for Taylor’s apartment, has also been reassigned by the department’s leadership [NOT CHARGED WITH ANY CRIME]. LINK
The search warrant for Taylor and her home explicitly identified her and her address. The Louisville police were not there by mistake. They believed that Taylor had ties to [Jamarcus] Glover [GUILT-BY-ASSOCIATION], one of the main suspects in the [DRUG RELATED] investigation. LINK
A subsequent search of Taylor’s apartment found no drugs. LINK
Police located their main suspect before going into Taylor’s home
2 WARRANTS WERE SERVED SIMULTANEOUSLY AND THE "TARGET" JAMARCUS GLOVER WAS ARRESTED WITHOUT BLOODSHED AT HIS HOME. RENDERING ANY "SEARCH" FOR JAMARCUS GLOVER AT BREONNA TAYLOR'S APARTMENT UNNECESSARY.
But even if [Jamarcus] Glover was not in custody before officers forced their way into Taylor’s home, based on statements by Mattingly, police still likely knew where he was at that time, as attorneys for Taylor’s family assert. LINK
Judge Mary Shaw has refused to address the case and her decision to sign the search warrant with The Courier Journal, but she has since told The New York Times she “asked needed questions of the officer, reviewed the affidavits prepared for each warrant and subsequently made the probable-cause determination required of me by law.” [NO DETAILS PROVIDED] LINK
Louisville’s U.S. postal inspector, Tony Gooden, told WDRB News in May that a different agency (which he did not identify) had asked in January to look into whether Taylor’s home was receiving suspicious mail. The office had concluded that the apartment was not, Gooden said. LINK
Additionally, though Taylor and Glover once dated, Glover said they were no longer in touch before her death. There is no evidence Glover was living in Taylor’s apartment. LINK
CONCLUSIONS.
THIS IS A MASSIVE FAILURE OF INTELLIGENCE.
THE PATRIOT ACT GIVES POLICE VAST, SWEEPING, AND VIRTUALLY UNFETTERED SURVEILLANCE POWERS.
(IFF) THE POLICE HAD NARROWED THE SUSPECT'S LOCATION TO ONLY 2 LIKELY LOCATIONS, WHY DID THEY NOT SIMPLY WAIT FOR THE SUSPECT TO WALK OUTSIDE INTO AN AMBUSH? OR WHY DID THEY NOT SIMPLY PLACE A TRACKER ON THEIR VEHICLE AND AMBUSH THEM (IN PLAINCLOTHES) AS THEY CARRY GROCERIES BACK TO THEIR CAR?
AND IF 3 GUYS IN PLAINCLOTHES STARTED BANGING ON MY DOOR IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT YELLING "THIS IS THE POLICE" I WOULDN'T BELIEVE THEM.
PRO TIP: I'VE SEEN THIS HAPPEN AND IT WASN'T "THE POLICE" AT ALL.
I watch this once a day - Click to watch 3 minutes,
At what point did we begin to conflate MONEY with MORALITY?
NEVER TALK TO THE POLICE OR A JUDGE, THEY CAN LEGALLY LIE TO YOU
NEVER CONVICT PEOPLE CHARGED WITH LAWS YOU DISAGREE WITH
Perhaps anarchy already exists and "THE COMMUNITY" is merely the highest manifestation of organized crime. – special thanks to @thoughts-in-time
Essential HIVE links,
https://hive.vote/
https://beeme.icu/?account=logiczombie
https://hiveblocks.com/@logiczombie
I WILL UPVOTE ANY AND ALL COMMENTS ON THIS POST, 1 UPVOTE PER ACCOUNT. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO LEAVE A "∴"
Copyright notice: Feel free to copy and paste any LOGICZOMBIE original content (posts and or comments and or replies and logiczombie logo, excluding quoted 3rd party content of course) according to copyleft principles (creative commons zero). In fact, I would prefer that you don't give me "credit" and simply post any choice quotes as your own (to mitigate the genetic fallacy). Sort of a "Creative Commons (-1)".
ZOMBIEBASICTRAINING
+proHUMAN +proFAMILY
Your scathing critique is requested.
..aaaand guess which Senator was accosted by BLM screaming 'SAY HER NAME'....
This one:
Rand Paul introduces bill to end the type of warrant involved in Breonna Taylor's death
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/11/politics/rand-paul-bill-no-knock-warrants-breonna-taylor/index.html
Misguided Mobs will roll over anything. It moves as one entity. If this wan't staged, then the Pauls were lucky. I estimate 60% chance of it being staged.
Accosting starts at 2:10
When you see children misbehaving in public, do you "blame the parents"?
Situational.
How about you?
Children are a mirror of what they observe the most.
And?
I can assure you, that most Chilled-Ren are not mirroring their Pair-Rents.
The very essence of the issues at hand.
The State has replaced the parent as designed.
MARX, ENGELS, AND THE ABOLITION OF THE FAMILY - RICHARD WEIKART
Children are mirroring what they observe the most.
Modern parents spend very little time face to face, directly interacting and teaching their children.
Most of the parents I've observed are self-absorbed children in grotesquely oversized flesh-suits.
We're children of virtual-orphans who've been raised by virtual-orphans.
First the radio scraped away a little bit of our individuality and our interpersonal skill.
Then the television stole a little more.
Now everyone has "their best friend" in their pocket or pressed up against their nose every minute of every day.
Pretty soon we'll be wearing it on our faces, and then it'll be plugged directly into our brains.
This isn't a "marxist conspiracy".
This is a "capitalist conspiracy".
Try just about 4 minutes of this,
"After talking with Breonna Taylor's family, I've come to the conclusion that it's long past time to get rid of no-knock warrants," Paul, a Republican, said in a statement. "This bill will effectively end no-knock raids in the United States."
I wouldn't expect any of them (including myself) to recognize Rand Paul on the street, much less know what policies they support.
At first it was a no knock warrant but after arresting their main suspect it was decided not to use a no knock warrant at her address as he was not there. The warrant for her address had her name on it because she was the currier for his money.
The warrant was for a search.
There is no warrant for Breonna Taylor's arrest.
SHE WAS NOT A SUSPECT.
THERE WAS NO CONTRABAND FOUND INSIDE THE APARTMENT.
THE COPS HAD BEEN WATCHING THE APARTMENT SINCE JANUARY.
THIS IS A MASSIVE FAILURE OF INTELLIGENCE.
What is the point of this statement? I wouldn't either. Are you saying that they should act like that since they are ignorant? Just, 'attack any politician' but 'we need change' LOL!
I'm "saying", the Romans created diversions for the public, VERY SPECIFICALLY to mitigate this type of behavior.
The host of your shared video clip seemed to think that these people should stop protesting simply because someone is sponsoring some legislation that might address part of their complaint.
At what point do you think Rand Paul would have sponsored this exact bill WITHOUT ANY PUBLIC PROTESTS??
You seem to be under the impression that 'public protests' and 'violent mobs' are one in the same.
I'm merely pointing out that ANY "protest" can be "transformed" into an "violent-angry-criminal-hate-mob" with only the very slightest provocation and or SAMPLE-BIAS by "the news".
RENDERING ALL PROTESTS DE FACTO "VIOLENT-ANGRY-CRIMINAL-HATE-MOBS".
WHICH IN-TURN MAKES ALL "FREEDOM-OF-ASSEMBLY" A MOCKINGLY FALSE PROMISE.
The cops NEVER charged Breonna Taylor with "drug dealing".
I keep hearing this same (BASELESS) accusation that "Breonna Taylor was dealing drugs".
4 LEGAL OPINIONS CONCERNING THE FACTS,
In 48 minutes and 23 seconds,
They can discuss all they want but up until this case against her ex boyfriend goes to court and they release all the evidence it's all just speculation on their part.
Lawyers focus on FACTS.
I'm no longer concerned with the details.
All I care about is that there is a 'politician' that has taken steps to trim some of the overreaching 'police' powers, which is a step for 'Change' in the "Right Direction" in preventing future incidents like this.
I don't like home 'Raids' of ANY sort. If they want to catch someone they can do so elsewhere, in this high surveillance police state where we can't even go to the bathroom without big brother knowing...
That makes sense.
Perhaps this one specific bill COMPLETELY MISSES THE POINT.
All of the professional LEGAL opinions I've encountered so far agree that if the warrant had (hypothetically) been served without any warning, Breonna Taylor would (probably) still be alive.
The critical point-of-failure here is the WARRANT ITSELF (also the opinion of the LAWYERS).
So, while you and I are in 100% agreement that the 4th amendment has basically been GUTTED and is currently BLEEDING TO DEATH IN A POOL OF ITS OWN VOMIT, the "no-knock" aspect itself is not really the CORE SYSTEMIC FAILURE in this particular case.
Exactly why I said:
Knock or no-knock, this is a disastrous process to 'raid' any 'home'. And yes, the 'Constitution' is also very clear against it. So, we are back to square one.
People don't hold their 'officials' accountable to their own 'laws'.
There is no Government/System in existence, or future existence, that will ever be 'successful' if it's own members ignore that system's requirements to run properly. Kinda like buying a new car that runs on gas, not fueling it when it is empty, and then saying, "the car is broken"....
It's practically criminal that the core provisions of constitutional law are not taught in every single school.
The 'legal opinions' are just that, opinions. They only matter if they are connected to the case.
This is a good rundown of the Facts of the case, and some other points.
Basically, as usual, if we go by anything in the 'media', we are stupid. I took the AG testimony as the most credible, which is not what I would usually say about an AG!
Well, they might also "matter" if they affect "public opinion" (informationwar/attentionwar).
Correct for the NEXT case/issue of this nature.
I have a feeling that this case/issue is far from "over".
What gives you that feeling? I am referring to the case investigation that already took place. It will not take place again. The case for the charges against the one cop is not over, but matters not at this point, for he was not charged with murder.
The decision was already made. There was no murder. Legal 'opinion' affecting public opinion, will thus affect the next case. However the 'opinions' can still affect the Issue, which to me is that our Laws are not adhered to by our 'ELected. The 'Raids' are a red herring. Why are 'Drugs' Illegal?....if you want to get all Constitutional...
That is the root of the issue. Making 'Criminals' out of 'non-violent' action. There has to be a Victim, to have a 'Crime'. Otherwise it is all just bullshit statutes of control by a hidden hand manipulating the 'Free People'.
This guy (and the AG) are both missing the point (classic distraction/diversion/razzle-dazzle).
The WARRANT ITSELF should be the focus (not "the cops").
They aren't missing the point imo. What you are talking about would be a separate point in my opinion. I mean I agree with your point, just that I don't agree that those guys are 'missing' the point. They are just actually focusing entirely on the case after the fact.
Did you know I don't think that there should be laws against 'Drugs', at all?
Because that (having statutes) in itself is Unlawful.
Ok, I thought you said "case closed" on the "cop misconduct"...
Which only leaves the FBI INVESTIGATION (which should be the headline at this point).
And yes, if I remember correctly, when we previously discussed "Easy Rider", you seemed to be quite adamantly "anti-drug".
Federal regulatory authority is quite limited (at least constitutionally).
But good luck winning a case against them (the house always wins).
To be honest if you've ever seen police use a battering ram to break down someone's door you don't get a chance to ask who it is once let alone three times, he's lying. They bang on the door, scream the name of the agency then ram the door, it's just that quick. I've seen two of them during my lifetime and both were the same. The paddy wagon pulls up, the police jump out and disperse quickly around the property, they identify themselves then bam.
I think you should go find the recent evidence they released stating they have recorded video of conversations of Glover in jail stating she had eight thousand dollars of his that Bre handled all his money. They have pictures of her carrying packages in and out of the drug house. They have a witness who said the police did identify themselves before entering, one within close proximity to her apartment. I don't know if that person lived in the same building or how it was set up or someone like me who seen something was about to go down with police and stopped to watch but the person was within close proximity.
I am not saying she deserved to die, not at all, I have a friend who got killed after circumstances in his life led him to living with a guy whom he had grown up with but he had become a unsavory character....in the end that friend ended his life, buried him god knows where since his body has never been found. The so called friend believed that he was going to turn state evidence against him after he (my friend) drove a van with his friend and a couple of others guys over to this couple's house to confront them about a drug debt. The woman in the house told him he could go f off and he then shot her and her boyfriend. She died but the boyfriend lived. From what the police told me my friend was the driver of the van he wasn't involved in the shooting. Sometimes in life that old cloche "live by the sword die by the sword" comes full tilt into reality. Sometimes those whom we choose to associate with end up getting someone killed that otherwise shouldn't have.
Just because someone has never been busted doesn't mean they weren't dealing drugs, supposedly, if you go look it up, they got tired of the media glorifying the whole thing and putting her up on a pedestaled, they have pictures, supposedly because they have not released them yet as they are evidence in the case, of not only her close associating with Glover but that Glover and her new boyfriend knew each other more than what is being admitted and they can prove they were both dealing and that she acted as their money currier. Like I said on other blogs I'd wait until you see all the evidence they are going to put forth in the defense, pictures, video and audio won't lie, so let's see what they have before assuming like everyone else has so far.
You're forgetting that, the warrant that was issued was specifically looking for Jamarcus Glover.
Not "drugs" and not "cash".
The cops searched Breonna Taylor's apartment after she died and found NO CONTRABAND.
The cops ALSO served a SIMULTANEOUS WARRANT 10 MILES AWAY AND HAD "THE SUSPECT" JAMARCUS GLOVER IN CUSTODY WITHIN MINUTES OF THE SHOOTING.
THIS IS A RIDICULOUS FAILURE OF INTELLIGENCE.
The Judge who issued a warrant on extremely flimsy "suspicion" is the primary culprit.
WITH ALL THE RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO "THE COPS", BREAKING DOWN DOORS AT 12:40AM SHOULD NEVER BE "NECESSARY".
This reminds me the TV series "wired". The poor people suffer while the rich politicians making money over dead bodies and souls.
The entire "war on drugs" is a WAR ON THE POOR.
Yes, I agree. The rich and wealthy have always fed on those who had nothing. Here's the thing: The social apparatus collects the affairs of the poor. The poor need welfare and must be administered. Through the administration, countless jobs have been created. The people working there have their income and secure living conditions.
All the unemployed, the old, the handicapped, the sick and foreigners create gigantic labor markets through their status. In addition to the official state authorities, all those who have founded so-called associations and aid organizations are fed, such as refugee aid and shelters. I have seen how a housing association settles rents via social welfare. For a refugee family of four people I have seen that 1700 Euros are settled. For those with a better education, there are nicer apartments and easier access to other forms of support. For those who are considered uneducated and under-exposed or against whom one is prejudiced, there is so-called support for asylum seekers, help centers - some of them church organizations - which "support" the refugees in voluntarily returning to their home countries. One then also pays the travel expenses.
Companies have been founded in all areas of human existence. They fight against illness, drugs, alcohol, crime and whatever else I know. At the same time the apparatus is completely dependent on the sick, drug addicts and criminals, because where else should you work, how should you get an income? Private companies, for example in the education sector, have become inextricably intertwined with state authorities, it is a huge felt. Lawyers enrich themselves on the desperate, judges lead a decent life on the back of the lawbreakers, university chairs prepare the next generations for their "valuable" task. It is a rather unusual way of thinking that the better off are deeply dependent on those who are worse off. One always sees the one-sided dependence relationship, from bottom to top.
Drugs are only placeholders. People need enemies they think they must fight against. Instead of seeing through the game that there is no enemy to be fought against. There are only people to work and cooperate with and to love.
I am not telling you anything new. I just had time to drop a comment and felt triggered by this conversation.
CHARITY = SCAM
Yes, that's why I find it interesting how UBI would pretty much destroy all "charity work" (because there would be no need for all the normal "paperwork").
In 22 minutes and 38 seconds,
I've started to deal with the topic of UBI in 2005 or so. I ran a blog for some years, almost exclusively wrote about UBI. More than 100 articles later I ran out of material. Then I stopped talking and thinking about it. I guess to implement a UBI ... we'd need another universe :)
Yes, bureaucracy is the worst. I really would like it to perish. A german politician once said, that tax return should fit on a beer mat. And I agree, charity can be like this:
Alan Watts.
P.S. I would like you to visit my blog and leave a comment. No traffic there :(
Here's my idea for UBI (FIX-US).
Take all the money spent on "public education".
No "new" money (no new taxes, no inflation risk).
Pool that money nation-wide and distribute it PER-CHILD.
That comes to about $15,000.00 per child per year in the USA.
Give that money directly to the parents.
(thanks for the invite)
Good points. They make you ask yourself questions. That is always good. For example, it raises the objection that people might spend that $15,000 on other things, not on the child. Which, of course, is an insinuation and expresses suspicion. But in fact it also expresses the flaws in the system. Because if I am suspicious that parents could use the money for other purposes, it makes it clear that the use of money alone is a problem. Where I use money to educate my child and/or do other uses, I seem to have no time to educate my child and other people do not have time to do so either, as they always put their money and time into the system, which suggests to them that the use and spending of money is the most important thing.
I notice that whenever the use of money is the most important thing, but where in return existential knowledge just like matter is not exchanged, again only the process of money transfer is followed, but less a really well-founded education. This can be seen in the fact that the fundamental important questions are taken out of the education and training of children and young adults.
However, I agree that if the unconditional transfer of money via a relevant amount of time continues, people usually come up with inspiring ideas and concepts of lifestyles apart from what is habit. For me, UBI would be a bridge solution towards communities which would like to reduce the amount of money and flow on the whole and replace it by another form of economy, less dependent on money and more on cooperation and entrepreneurship.
Money alone gives the illusion of independency as it separates people. A single person starts to think that he accomplished work "all by himself and his salary" while in fact it is always a common effort. Which he does not see nor perceive as he is focused on his bank account.
People in general do not understand that the amount of money, which is created out of nothing, still has real and severe impacts on the material world and thus all people - and ecology - on earth. Once mathematics and reality drift apart, it's hard to stay with reality and not follow the virtual ideas.
Mind cannot create matter.
Good points. They make you ask yourself questions. That is always good. For example, it raises the objection that people might spend that $15,000 on other things, not on the child. Which, of course, is an insinuation and expresses suspicion. But in fact it also expresses the flaws in the system. Because if I am suspicious that parents could use the money for other purposes, it makes it clear that the use of money alone is a problem. Where I use money to educate my child and/or do other uses, I seem to have no time to educate my child and other people do not have time to do so either, as they always put their money and time into the system, which suggests to them that the use and spending of money is the most important thing.
I notice that whenever the use of money is the most important thing, but where in return existential knowledge just like matter is not exchanged, again only the process of money transfer is followed, but less a really well-founded education. This can be seen in the fact that the fundamental important questions are taken out of the education and training of children and young adults.
However, I agree that if the unconditional transfer of money via a relevant amount of time continues, people usually come up with inspiring ideas and concepts of lifestyles apart from what is habit. For me, UBI would be a bridge solution towards communities which would like to reduce the amount of money and flow on the whole and replace it by another form of economy, less dependent on money and more on cooperation and entrepreneurship.
Money alone gives the illusion of independency as it separates people. A single person starts to think that he accomplished work "all by himself and his salary" while in fact it is always a common effort. Which he does not see nor perceive as he is focused on his bank account.
People in general do not understand that the amount of money, which is created out of nothing, still has real and severe impacts on the material world and thus all people - and ecology - on earth. Once mathematics and reality drift apart, it's hard to stay with reality and not follow the virtual ideas.
Mind cannot create matter.
Good points. They make you ask yourself questions. That is always good. For example, it raises the objection that people might spend that $15,000 on other things, not on the child. Which, of course, is an insinuation and expresses suspicion. But in fact it also expresses the flaws in the system. Because if I am suspicious that parents could use the money for other purposes, it makes it clear that the use of money alone is a problem. Where I use money to educate my child and/or do other uses, I seem to have no time to educate my child and other people do not have time to do so either, as they always put their money and time into the system, which suggests to them that the use and spending of money is the most important thing.
I notice that whenever the use of money is the most important thing, but where in return existential knowledge just like matter is not exchanged, again only the process of money transfer is followed, but less a really well-founded education. This can be seen in the fact that the fundamental important questions are taken out of the education and training of children and young adults.
However, I agree that if the unconditional transfer of money via a relevant amount of time continues, people usually come up with inspiring ideas and concepts of lifestyles apart from what is habit. For me, UBI would be a bridge solution towards communities which would like to reduce the amount of money and flow on the whole and replace it by another form of economy, less dependent on money and more on cooperation and entrepreneurship.
Money alone gives the illusion of independency as it separates people. A single person starts to think that he accomplished work "all by himself and his salary" while in fact it is always a common effort. Which he does not see nor perceive as he is focused on his bank account.
People in general do not understand that the amount of money, which is created out of nothing, still has real and severe impacts on the material world and thus all people - and ecology - on earth. Once mathematics and reality drift apart, it's hard to stay with reality and not follow the virtual ideas.
Mind cannot create matter.
thank you very much for your article and video,good luck on the weekend
thank you very much for YOUR post,have a nice weekend
Curated for #informationwar (by @aagabriel)
Delegate to the @informationwar! project and get rewarded
INFORMATIONWAR = ATTENTIONWAR
chill and listen some music :)
if i didn't think it was important, i wouldn't say anything at all.
ANTICENTRISM WILL WIN
subscribed to https://www.youtube.com/user/flavacrava
thank you.
haha
lookathemshine
In 3 minutes and 17 seconds,
The irony here is that Taylor was not deemed threatening enough to merit a SWAT team. Instead, she was subjected to all of the most dangerous aspects of a SWAT raid, undertaken by officers in street clothes. There were no medics nearby. In fact, an ambulance on standby was told to leave the scene an hour before the raid. After she was shot, Taylor lie in her house for 20 minutes before receiving any medical attention. LINK
I have not even studied many details of this case, but find a flaw in logic here:
How was it not threatening, when the investigation reported that after the cops entered, they were immediately fired at by the (new?) boyfriend, at which time they then returned fire.
Seems like they assessed a threat like that very one no?
-Those you ride with- might brand you their label.
Her boyfriend was NOT under criminal investigation.
Her boyfriend was NOT a suspected drug-dealer.
Her boyfriend was the owner of a perfectly legal and licensed fire-arm (second amendment fanatic).
Her boyfriend fired at intruders trying to break down the door at 12:42 AM.
The police, who reportedly had the apartment "under surveillance" including mounted video cameras, somehow "didn't know" there was another person in the apartment with Breonna Taylor.
THIS WAS A CRITICAL FAILURE OF INTELLIGENCE.
As always.
That's what you get when you allow banker mafia cartels to have a monopoly on whatever they want.
We are so far gone there isn't really anything that can be done about it anymore until total collapse, or total irreversible enslavement. Both are quite close so looks like we shouldn't have to wait much longer.
Take your pick, RAMPANT CRIME (OR) POLICE STATE (or both)
I do not Consent.
12:40 a.m.: Officers were in place outside of Taylor's apartment and began to knock on the door.
12:42 a.m.: Neighbors in the St. Anthony Garden Apartments call 911 to report gunshots.
12:47 a.m.: Walker calls 911 and says, "Somebody kicked in the door and shot my girlfriend."
LINK
You need to stop reading that stuff. Wait for it to come out in court. I find it hard to believe that he called his mother first who told him to call the cops, which maybe a minute by the time he dials, connects, tells her whatever, she tells him to call police, he calls the police, that took three minutes the article said, he hangs up and calls her mother....how in the world can he not know until he calls her mom those are the police?....
I've seen criminals bang on people's doors and yell, "POLICE, OPEN UP".
I WOULD NOT BELIEVE THEM.
4 LEGAL OPINIONS CONCERNING THE FACTS,
In 48 minutes and 23 seconds,
Congratulations @logiczombie! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPDo not miss the last post from @hivebuzz:
HERE'S A COPY OF THE ACTUAL SEARCH WARRANT,
https://reason.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Breonna-Taylor-search-warrants.pdf