URGENT: YOUR INACTION IS REQUIRED (don't load this app, don't voluntarily cooperate, don't voluntarily forfeit your right to privacy, don't voluntarily forfeit your CIVIL RIGHTS.
ZOMBIEBASICTRAINING
Click to watch 10 minutes,
URGENT: YOUR INACTION IS REQUIRED (don't load this app, don't voluntarily cooperate, don't voluntarily forfeit your right to privacy, don't voluntarily forfeit your CIVIL RIGHTS. We will not give them our fingerprints - You might also want to remove all apps from your smartphones that you don't consider absolutely vital.
Click to watch 2 minutes,
There is NO cause for which I am prepared to kill.
Whatever they do to us, we will attack no one. Kill no one. But we will NOT give our FINGERPRINTS. Not one of us.
They will imprison us, they will fine us, they will seize our possessions, but they cannot take away our self-respect if we do not give it to them.
They may torture my body, break my bones, even kill me, then, they will have my dead body NOT my obedience.
Let us take a solemn oath, that, come what may, we will not SUBMIT to this law.
Click to watch 14 minutes,
The only thing I have difficulty with and you say its gunna come after us, I'm worried about what you want the government to do about what you consider LARPING which is what you would have said I was doing basically and that I was a threat and then, what, I should be shut off the internet? That's why I wonder where you're going with your thesis.
I'm just wondering though what you suggest, like, so it's a threat, what do you suggest be done about the threat. That's what I'm concerned about. What do you do, what do you wanna do? Take them off the internet? Because you would have wanted to do the same thing with my livestream and I have a discord where people come and share information and they would have said, maybe rightly, that it was a call to ACTION for me to tell people to take a picture of you at a public event, um, I apologize for that, what do you suggest, because I worry about it creeping into my world.
WE'RE SO PARANOID, WE'RE TURNING AGAINST EACH OTHER.
Some union organizers, Huber found, used red bandanas and the term redneck as a way to culturally integrate groups of white, black, and immigrant miners—who were often set against each other by owners eager to divide labor’s power—into a single identity. LINK
DON'T BE DISTRACTED BY THE FAKE LABELS USED TO DIVIDE REAL WORKING-CLASS AND POOR PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER.
OWS, SJW, MAGA, BLM, FLAT-EARTHERS, CHICANO'S, WHITES, NATIVE-AMERICANS. WE'RE ALL GETTING EQUALLY FUCKED.
AND NOW OUR PUPPET-MASTERS ARE SEDUCING (HYPNOTIZING) US INTO FUCKING EACH OTHER.
ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS STAND BACK AND LAUGH.
THE SMART ONES, used red bandanas and the term REDNECK as a way to culturally integrate groups of white, black, and immigrant miners—who were often set against each other by owners eager to divide labor’s power—into a single identity. LINK
Even the most "trusted" "truth-teller" on mainstream media (billionaire backed broadcaster) who usually brings weekly incisive analysis EXPLICITLY SUGGESTED PEOPLE STOP CONSIDERING "CONSPIRACY THEORIES" BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT "SUPPORTED BY EXPERTS" AND "TRUSTED SOURCES".
They further suggested that there's no way the government could possibly keep important (self-serving) secrets from the public for any significant period of time.
We don't need any NEW CONSPIRACY THEORIES, WE NEED TO REMEMBER THE BIG ONES.
Apparently, this well educated and intelligent mouthpiece has never heard of THE PENTAGON PAPERS or THE TORTURE REPORT.
The PENTAGON PAPERS in 4 minutes,
THE TORTURE REPORT in 4 minutes,
I guess it's ok for Americans to violate human rights as long as they were "following orders" (heroes), but it's not ok for our defeated enemies to violate human rights as long as they were "following orders"(war criminals).
THESE ARE BLATANT VIOLATIONS OF THE PUBLIC TRUST.
When the most "trusted" "truth-teller" on mainstream media bemoans "CONSPIRACY THEORIES" and tells people to calm down and LISTEN TO THE EXPERTS, they display (EITHER) a shocking naivete (OR) a shocking cynicism about the sheeple watching their show that's frankly, personally insulting.
WE DON'T TRUST THE OFFICIAL STORY BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN REPEATEDLY PROVEN UNTRUSTWORTHY.
WE SHOULDN'T BE EXPECTED TO FOLLOW OUR LEADERS BASED ON BLIND FAITH.
GOVERNMENT IS NOT A RELIGION.
IT SHOULD BE A SYSTEM OF CHECKS AND BALANCES, NOT A HALL OF MIRRORS THAT OBSCURE AND OBFUSCATE EVERY MOVE THEY MAKE.
A Century of LIES, in 24 minutes,
THE SMART ONES, used red bandanas and the term REDNECK as a way to culturally integrate groups of white, black, and immigrant miners—who were often set against each other by owners eager to divide labor’s power—into a single identity. LINK
The rather bizarre Orwellian concept of "objectivity" has somehow managed to worm its way into our language. Practically everyone falsely believes (with unjustifiable confidence) that "objectivity" exists and is an unquestionable ideal-high-goal and more so that their own beliefs are "more objective" or "fair and balanced" than their detractors, and beyond that, all their detractors are either being disingenuous, "are fundamentally and incurably stupid and/or evil", or intellectually deaf and blind. Case closed. Let's all go back to our bubbles.
This premise about "objectivity" detailed above, allows people to pretend great atrocities are justified against "non believers" (anti-vaxxers/flat-earthers) because "they deserve what they get". Side note: In order to properly justify such a hypothesis (like "they deserve what they get") would require significant and detailed philosophical exploration. In other words, if you believe in a black & white world and "philosophy" muddies the waters, then "philosophy" is a "problem" and must be wrong, ex post-facto. This is an example of "affirming the consequent" (a logical fallacy) which basically means you are "closed minded" and only seek serious exploration of ideas that you believe are likely to reinforce your own pre-conceived ideas, technically known as prejudices.
And before you think I'm trying to single out one particular group of people, "godless secular liberal progressives" are just as guilty of this type of thinking as the other more obvious religious and political targets.
The simple fact that people (followers of "TRUSTED SOURCES") are able to very effectively dismiss and deflect all criticism by characterizing their detractors as "biased" proves how pervasive and insidious and anti-intellectual this ideal-high-goal of "objectivity" is. This specific technique is a combination of "false choice" and indirect "ad hominem" attack. In formal logic it is widely recognized as an illegitimate form of argument (logical fallacy). And yet, by all accounts "millions of people" think this qualifies as a plausible line of reasoning.
Now before you dismiss me as "a crack pot", I would like to point out that I do believe "a broad consensus" is a very good standard for "truth". And even Karl Popper admits, when pressed, that science isn't based on "objectivity" but rather on "a broad consensus" of "well qualified individuals", which in a lot of ways is nearly functionally identical, but with the key difference being that "a broad consensus" doesn't necessarily categorize detractors as either being disingenuous, "fundamentally and incurably stupid and/or evil", or intellectually deaf and blind. It at least leaves the door open to the idea that there may be some legitimate disagreement based on contrary evidence or other logical considerations without an automatic reflexive leap to pure DEMONIZATION (terrorism/freedom-fighters is another good example of this).
Feel free to expand upon and/or challenge any of the arguments described above or add your own. I look forward to having a civil conversation regarding the topic at hand.
I watch this once a day - Click to watch 3 minutes,
Perhaps anarchy already exists and "THE COMMUNITY" is merely the highest manifestation of organized crime. – special thanks to @thoughts-in-time
Essential HIVE links,
https://hive.vote/
https://beeme.icu/?account=logiczombie
https://hiveblocks.com/@logiczombie
Copyright notice: Feel free to copy and paste any LOGICZOMBIE original content (posts and or comments and or replies and logiczombie logo, excluding quoted 3rd party content of course) according to copyleft principles (creative commons zero). In fact, I would prefer that you don't give me "credit" and simply post any choice quotes as your own (to mitigate the genetic fallacy). Sort of a "Creative Commons (-1)".
ZOMBIEBASICTRAINING
+proHUMAN +proFAMILY
Your scathing critique is requested.
What I find deeply ironic is that at most of these news networks are known for their work whistleblowing and proving conspiracies. When it was revealed that we were bombing Cambodia,I think it was The Guardian who were basically treated like WikiLeaks is today.
Now look at them. Utterly disgraceful.
Yep. "Past performance is no guarantee of future results".
Even the name "The Guardian" sounds heroic, but are they Guarding The People, or are they Guarding The Oppressors (their financiers)?
thank you for the video information, good luck
I appreciate your attention.
Good post, sir.
No scathing critique! lol
I must be losing my touch!
Everyone's allowed an off day, matey! lol
When you hear 'Trusted sources', your bullshit detector should sound the alarm.
100%
Curated for #informationwar (by @aagabriel)
Delegate to the @informationwar! project and get rewarded
YOUR MEDICAL INFORMATION (INCLUDING VACCINE STATUS) IS PRIVATE AND PERSONAL.
EVEN YOUR TEMPERATURE IS CONSIDERED MEDICAL STATUS AND ANY (NON-MEDICAL) PLACE OF BUSINESS (INCLUDING AN AIRPORT OR BUS STATION) THAT DEMANDS TO TAKE YOUR TEMPERATURE IS VIOLATING YOUR RIGHT TO MEDICAL PRIVACY.
Congratulations @logiczombie! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your board And compare to others on the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPTo support your work, I also upvoted your post!
Do not miss the last post from @hivebuzz:
CUTTING POWER AND WATER IS A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION.
In 42 minutes,
Who will FACTCHECK the "FACTCHECKERS"??
Who WATCHES the WATCHERS??
In 11 minutes,
The necessity of (and use-case for) CON-ARTISTS,
In 11 minutes,
In 6 minutes,
It's just one more way of reducing your LIBERTY and reminding you they can FUCK with you anytime they want.
web counter