Hello. https://peakd.com/newworldorder/@newworldfreedom/dear-new-world-order
P.s. Still can't enter because when a conspiracy theory usually gets confirmed or proven, it stops being a conspiracy theory, as it it has become a proven fact. Or am I wrong on this?
So what's left? What is it? If it's not some kind of idea or theory? Well, we can name a thing a thousands different ways, but what is it most? A conspiracy? An Event? A Crime? Or a warcrime?
At first look at the inspiration material at least 50% are actual crimes, warcrimes or disgusting events. Cannot call these a conspiracy theory or a theory. They are crimes, usually crimes against humanity or warcrimes.
Imagine a 5 year old saying, >> "But sir, that's not a theory or nor a conspiracy theory, that's a proven crime"
I think that's the whole point of this exercise. To write a research article to show that it wasn't merely just a "conspiracy theory" when the information was originally floating around, but there was real facts around the story or the actual real conspiracy, when it was denied/dismissed as one at the time.....if that makes any sense:)
Let's say it different: Confirmed Conspiracy Theory or a Confirmed Crime?
I don't call them conspiracy "theories" myself, unless it's generally in the framework of rejecting it - using the term as a way to highlight actual conspiracies that were once dismissed as craziness, as well as in the form of irony.
It's the establishment backed thinkers/debunking/gate-keeping types that do that as a way to hide their real crimes (yes crimes against humanity!). All we are doing is using that term against them as way to discredit their own debunking and "theories", that we are the actual conspiracy "theorists" ourselves. Conspiracy theorising is not an unusual or illogical thing to do anyway. That's is how actual crimes are solved - and why so many people are charged with conspiracy (mostly against the state, but not the other way around in a lot of cases). You can't uncover a conspiracy without actually theorising and/or collecting scientific data to back up your "theory" of a conspiracy taking place.
I completely agree that crimes and war crimes against humanity are in themselves conspiracies, because many of them were conceived and planned out by the conspirators before they actually took place. That is the very definition of a conspiracy, so using that term is appropriate in those cases (in conjunction with the terms of war crimes and any other crimes or corruption in general).
I don't think we should necessarily get too hung up on this (even though I completely understand your point on a fundamental level and agree with it). I think it's too late to change most of the average peoples minds (due to decades of deliberate attacks and propaganda in defence of real conspiracies) on that in general and the collection and spreading of truthful information is a lot more important than anything else. Most people can't be forced into anything either - they must transform themselves through a self-awakening process....that's why verifiable information is king. If it's out there, then that process will take place for whoever is open to it in a non-partisan way.
If you go back and look at previous deepdives article that others and myself in this community produced, you can see that in most cases they were produced in the form of investigative journalism with the use of real and verifiable documents that can show real evidence that a "conspiracy" took place, or there was overwhelming evidence of crimes against humanity perpetrated by the state.
That's what I have always concentrated on myself. Real documents and real data to show that it wasn't just a "theory", without anything to back up the article produced.
That title is not promoting the term "conspiracy theory" itself, but rather re-inforcing the fact that real conspiracies that were considered just crazy "theories", have been confirmed and can be verified with real evidence and documents that it was indeed a conspiracy (or high level corruption/crime against humanity).
Real crimes by way of conspiracy yes. Look, what's the point of having law if the people don't even know what a crime is? What the point of debunking conspiracy theory if you keep labeling it that way? Why use a term the CIA invented to discredit the truth so they could continue their Nazi-like ways?
Those are goddamn crimes brother, you know it. Not so much a conspiracy or a conspiracy theory, it's a CRIME with checkable facts, that's what's most important, and not a small petty crime like stealing An apple to eat either. No these are actual warcrimes, actual genocides and actual crimes against humanity.
Say it right brother and sister, unless you want them to get away with it?
We don't disagree and we've discussed the terminology in previous comments. The point of the research challenge is to showcase instances that were once thought to be 'conspiracy theory'. You're right, they may be simply considered a crime now. Perhaps even admitted after decades of uncertainty but now the historical record suggests otherwise.
We get it. We agree, the term conspiracy theory is derogatory. We could have called the contest by another name but it would go over the heads of most normies.
Many continue to believe certain events were not orchestrated by special interests to achieve their political, social or economic goals - this is a reminder to be critical of official proclamations from the authorities that repeated enough become entrenched interpretations of the events in question, even when evidence indicates otherwise.
We do appreciate your concerns on this and hope that you might put some energy into making a post for DD19, that would be very cool.
Thank you
I really don't have anymore time but thanks.