outer space? - james webb space telescope

in Deep Dives2 years ago (edited)

why do we only have this crap animation?

even back then, they at least had some "real" footage
very funny from 48 min ;)


how about they use the new James Webb Space Telescope to shoot some high definition pictures of the 1.3 light seconds away moon instead of some 8000 light years away nebulas?

grafik.png

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/James-Webb-Telescope-Breathtaking-images-of-the-beginning-of-the-universe/ss-AA10G02T?fullscreen=true&parent-ns=ar&parent-title=How-an-Arizona-scientist-helped-make-those-breathtaking-Webb-telescope-images-possible&parent-content-id=AA10FVyY#image=AA10G02T|2

I wonder what might be the excuse for not being able to shoot some high definition pictures of the moon landing spot?

I guess the telescope just might be too good.
high definition "pictures" of 8000 light years away nebula..

but still nothing better than these pictures from the moon landing spot?


and one last clifhanger question:

what even about

inner space?


nixon calls moon without speaking delay?

xD the pope

Sort:  

Zugegeben, ich hab bei den Webb Bildern auch als Erstes an so eine Version von "Modern-Art" gedacht. Oder vielleicht paar arbeitslose Science-Fiction Designer, die wieder Schwung in die Bude bringen ...

nicht vergessen:
Die Impfung wirkt und schützt.

Modern Art ist cool!

grafik.png

is that far away from you @trayan ?

Die Impfung ist effektiv super!

weißt du noch, wo die NASA das veröffentlicht hat?

ne, ist n sehr altes Meme, denke nun bereits schon 8 Jahre oder so.. auch schon endlose Male ge fact checked, was ich umso lustiger finde.. ^^

!BEER ;)


Hey @woelfchen, here is a little bit of BEER from @trayan for you. Enjoy it!

If you like BEER and want to support us please consider voting @louis.witness on HIVE and on HIVE Engine.

haha! yes it's somewhere here.. never been there...

The more i read about moon, the more i get excited! Let suggest you one book, written 2000 years ago about moon! If you found on a library, read it for sure! You will get suprised for a lot of things
https://www.amazon.de/-/en/Plutarch/dp/1293055794

I like crazy theories like that the moon was just a projection of the landmass of bigger earth and our little blue ball earth is just a little crater on it :3
men being on the moon just means they were/ are on the bigger earth and moon map would be a mapping of bigger earth

floods are also very interesting, every body floods/ uses water to counter intruders/ foreign objects/matter/bodies :)

look what I found

Oh lucky you! Very nice buddy! It is short but remember if you read,as absurd and exaggerated as what you will read may seem to you, so absurd and hyperbolic are all the natural phenomena related to the Moon! Happy reading and we are here if you want to discuss something!

Oh, this is old story. The same question was posed about the Hubble Space Telescope (HST):

Can Hubble see the Apollo landing sites on the Moon?

No, Hubble cannot take photos of the Apollo landing sites.

“An object on the Moon 4 meters (4.37 yards) across, viewed from HST, would be about 0.002 arcsec in size. The highest resolution instrument currently on HST is the Advanced Camera for Surveys at 0.03 arcsec. So anything we left on the Moon cannot be resolved in any HST image. It would just appear as a dot.”

HubbleSite - Reference Desk - FAQs

The same principle applies for the JWST. This myth is based on misconceptions about how telescopes and light work. Feel free to read more about it here.

Haha thanks for the great laugh :D

as I said, the telescope is just TOO FUCKING GOOD

8000 light years away? no problem, here you get some high definition pictures of some nebula

1,3 light seconds away? FUCK HELL NO - the moon is a fucking complex thing which is not far enough away

^^

Yes, you can see objects at 8,000 light years away, but they're not the size of a truck, are they? They're incredibly massive, we can only see them at large scale. You can't see an object the size of a flag in those neubuli either, can you? If that was possible, then we would have high resolution pictures of Pluto already, its surface, etc. We would see pebbles on comets, dust particles on Mars. Your backyard telescope should see this.

In order to have the resolution you're demanding, you would need to build a telescope 60,000 more powerful than your eyes, and its size would be huge. Good luck with that.

It's infinitely easier to fake the moon landing than to violate the laws of physics, optics in this case. Science is not this kind of whimsical and nature is not this kind of magic.

Check out this video where someone with experience and knowledge on telescopes addresses something similar and gives the answer to this question.

what even is 1,3 light seconds compared to 8000 light years?

comes pretty close to the 60.000 ratio

it is easier for them to shoot pictures 8000 light years away and then send it from the telescope back, than hovering a drone around the telescope itself and filming the real deployment and sending that video back, instead of showing us some cheap ass animation like in video #1

thank you, I will look into ur video

!hivebits

Success! You mined .9 HBIT & the user you replied to received .1 HBIT on your behalf. mine | wallet | market | tools | discord | subscribe | <>< daily

Starting Sept 10, you will need to reply to your OWN post or comment to mine HBIT. You MIGHT also find a bonus token! Details here.