Those who assume that "trans" is innate assume that rigid sexist gender stereotypes are innate.
"Trans" has no equivalent in physical-material reality. It is purely a feeling.
Sex is innate - just like the ability to distinguish between men and women.
It's an important social and survival instinct.
Gender stereotypes are socialized and instilled.
They are a social construct and prescribe fixed norms of behavior for girls and boys as "typically male" / "typically female."
Children who do not conform to these stereotypes suffer in a sexist environment.
"Trans" reproduces rigid sexist gender stereotypes - but in this case of the opposite sex.
"Trans" does not exist without these stereotypes.
Suffering from these stereotypes is painful and real.
Homosexual women in particular can tell you a thing or two about it.
A massive suffering under one's own bodily reality is called gender dysphoria or gender incongruence.
Besides breaking out of homosexuality and sexism via "trans", there are various paraphilias, e.g. autogynephilia, especially in men.
This is the sexual arousal and narcissistic supply through the representation and external perception as a woman.
https://soundcloud.com/lunartalk/but-i-can-feel
This form thus relies on an audience and requires others - especially women and children - to validate their own self-image.
This form of "trans" occurs predominantly among adult men and is fueled mainly by porn consumption (e.g., "sissy porn," "feminization").
Most of these men do not seek gender reassignment - except for hormone supplementation and breasts.
They keep their penises and are heterosexual, even if they call themselves lesbians.
Quite a few homosexual men also go this route.
Women who are "trans" very often want to escape the rigid sexism and homophobia of our society.
Especially among girls there is an extreme demand for gender reassignment.
The long-term consequences are ignored.
Detransitioners tell about it.
If you now sells "trans" to children as innate, this has the following effects:
children are confused in their self-perception and the perception of others. Clearly stating the over 90% certain perception of an adult's gender is important for child protection and their whole development (Trans as a distraction from deeper problems, more problems later on, just mentioning masks & mimics here)
when children have problems with their own body and gender, they are served "trans" as a way out. In Sweden, this has led to a massive influx of girls into gender clinics. Sweden has stopped the treatment with puberty blockers because of the severe consequences.
when girls are told to be tolerant and to put aside their clear perception of gender for the needs and self-perception of a man, this is a abuse tactic. Girls should be taught that they have a right to say no.
explaining to children that they might be born in the wrong body, that they might feel their gender, or that they might perceive their gender for themselves confuses self-perception. Children should learn that gender is irrelevant to talent and preferences.
telling children that high heels, a dress, and glitter make a man a woman promotes sexism and rigid gender stereotypes - the exact opposite of diversity.
- In summary, it achieves the exact opposite of what it wants to achieve. Especially when it comes to child protection, children should learn that tolerance ends where (perceptual) boundaries are crossed to make an adult feel better.
Additional:
Once you don't know what a woman is.
It won''t take long until you won't know what a child is.
And then we certainly "won't have a pedophile problem anymore"..
or more like the pedophiles have no more problems.
Also the whole debate just shows how deeply people are trapped in duality and therefore dialectics.
But the world is certainly more polar, than dual.
There is a spectrum in between.
How about we go back to individualism, everyone can just be oneself,
instead of identity politics?
But the masses are instrumentalized to go back to sexism, misogyny, groupthink, even racism (against russians.. is okay?)..
Just a few thoughts & examples.
It is all about memevirus, not gene virus!
Divide & Conquer.
When I was a child, I told My mom I wanted to be a boy. Good thing that was 60 years ago. I did not want to be a boy for sexual reasons, but today They might try to change My body over a statement like that.
I wanted to be a boy because I did not like the things "girls" got to do, like cooking and sewing. I liked shop (not home ec), and playing ball with the boys, and other things boys were allowed to do that I was not.
I have never been anything but hetero when it comes to sex...
Exactly! Girls who are "tomboys" and boys who like more feminine things (makeup/jewelry/etc.) should not feel like they need gender reassignment surgery in order to be accepted by others.
In a way, it's almost like saying they're the ones who need to change. When really it's our society and it's messed-up gender expectations and judgment of those who don't fit into those stereotypes that needs to change.
Exactly!
I really hope people find out, they can just be themselves.
Unimportant of what others think or say.
But then they need to work on themselves on something in them (problems) instead of on something outside.. (which is always compensation for those problems..)
Great insights throughout! Yes, on the surface much of the dialogue we see around gender/sexual preferences claims to break down the rigidity of gender stereotypes: boys can play with dolls, girls can play football, etc. But in the end, they simply reinforce stereotypes and are yet another example of attempting to put people into a box and divide people.
Biologically speaking, there are a tiny fraction of people that are born with indeterminate, or even both sets of external genitalia. There are also internal disconformities with external genitalia, and there are certain to be those born with genetic behavioural dysphoria. These folks have real issues they need to resolve as they see fit.
The number of people born with these medical issues is extremely low, but may be increasing due to endocrine disrupting chemical exposure in the womb and after. However, it's still a very small number of people.
Thanks!
Cuz of that small number one cant just indoctrinate everyone.
Make the exception the norm?
Why do we even need norms at all? Identity politics?
Can we just have individualism back?
Everyone can just be themselves?
The eusociality of humanity is not a trivial thing. It is a capacity we have that has been ordained not by our whims, but by the vagaries of our environment, which includes each other and our whims, but is enforced by evolution, which works through death. There is a range of behaviour that has been allowed to persist by the forbearance of deadly consequences, and this includes how we represent ourselves to one another, and how we value our fellows and society, and, more to the point, how we are valued by society.
Today society is highly engineered, precisely controlled for the benefit of what I consider to be bad actors. You note, and I agree, that transage and various unsavory behaviour is being ordained by those Machiavellian masterminds, for purposes unclear to me. That ordination is extremely compelling, and apparently effective, because hordes of people are behaving accordingly.
We each interpret our person through our individual obsequity and aloofness, our need to belong, or to be different, as evolution has crafted us. The sheep are being themselves. We dissenters are being ourselves. What I see as a biologist is that ordering sheep to be gay or trans removes them from the gene pool. It is an evolutionary force removing personalities that dependent on obeying overlords from our posterity.
In a generation or two, there will be a lot fewer sheeple in society, if this keeps up. Society will be less easily led by Machiavellian overlords as evolution sorts the non-reproducing gays and trans into their absence from our posterity whose parents did functionally have hetero sex. That may not be how you want it to happen, but it seems you and evolution want the same thing.
We need self-regulation
And maybe we are already in it, as you seem to suggest
Still I think it is important not to do nothing. Beliving it will all sort out by itself and is perfectly fine/ all supposed to be just like it is right now.. It is also a kind of obeying, I think
I also really like biology, and we had so much important stuff in school (german gymnasium) but people didnt care, always told me it is just dry memorization, while it never was for me.
It is just fucking interesting and logical..
Not surorising they have no fucking clue now and destroy their immune system in panic..
Or believe in god..
Still, im also not so sure about Evolution :P
Thank you for your comments :)
Bla Bla Bla from you as always.
That's exactly why ur audience doesnt support you.
See, we can also switch it around. :)
I just dont care about you, your worldviews, your lucifer & extinction worshipping or even ur edgy humor.
Also I dont even care to defend against ur bs anymore.
Each to his own.
Enjoy your ride bah.
As you already do since years.
But good to see u at least not worshipping pedophilia.
I do not think like this.
But I mention it cuz others think like this.
But actually I would have really thought you like Baal and pedophiles and the khazarian mafia, so hate the evil Putin?
Werent you an extinction rebel?
So who is ur favorite destruction candidate?
Lul have a good time as long as it is still possible.
You really dont like ganjafarmer, eh?
xD
Yeah you are right.
Good times would be no times, extinction, for u..