I am having difficulties to fit the term "socialism" into this context. When you speak of a world without borders, then to my mind, it's not about socialism but it's a form of positive anarchy. An anarchical way of living is something which does not need laws and their enforcement, for the rules are already clear to all those living and working together. My definition of "anarchy" will probably differentiate from your definition of anarchy. That's why I placed the attribute "positive" in front of it. Are you interested in further readings? I am not sure, if I already recommended Darren Allan to you and his book "33 Myths"?
I am having difficulties to fit the term "socialism" into this context. When you speak of a world without borders, then to my mind, it's not about socialism but it's a form of positive anarchy.
Well, the anarchy that is my ideal is called "communism" which is a stateless, classless and moneyless society. You know, like the tribes of old. And my definition of anarchy can't work in a capitalist system as capitalism enforces class-division. Anarchy does not mean that there are no leaders and followers, by the way, but it does mean that there are no rulers and ruled.
Thanks for the book recommendation :-) I'll look into it if I find the time...
I want you to ponder on the sheer arrogance, the immeasurable sense of self-importance, the megalomaniacal narcissism that allows one to think it's okay to claim a portion of the planet for themselves.
..Socialism.
Control from the top down, deciding on how others live their lives.
Pot, kettle, black...?
no pennies dropping?.... no smelling of any coffee?
Your post is reblogged and upvoted by me. It is a good post. Thank you @zyx066
Thanks for stopping by, and for the support!
I am having difficulties to fit the term "socialism" into this context. When you speak of a world without borders, then to my mind, it's not about socialism but it's a form of positive anarchy. An anarchical way of living is something which does not need laws and their enforcement, for the rules are already clear to all those living and working together. My definition of "anarchy" will probably differentiate from your definition of anarchy. That's why I placed the attribute "positive" in front of it. Are you interested in further readings? I am not sure, if I already recommended Darren Allan to you and his book "33 Myths"?
Well, the anarchy that is my ideal is called "communism" which is a stateless, classless and moneyless society. You know, like the tribes of old. And my definition of anarchy can't work in a capitalist system as capitalism enforces class-division. Anarchy does not mean that there are no leaders and followers, by the way, but it does mean that there are no rulers and ruled.
Thanks for the book recommendation :-) I'll look into it if I find the time...
You are welcome.
It's worth reading. :)
I want you to ponder on the sheer arrogance, the immeasurable sense of self-importance, the megalomaniacal narcissism that allows one to think it's okay to claim a portion of the planet for themselves.
..Socialism.
Control from the top down, deciding on how others live their lives.
Pot, kettle, black...?
no pennies dropping?.... no smelling of any coffee?