Anybody that thinks it is ok to send armed thugs to force their will onto unwilling people is a fascist.
Rule by force is the disease.
Absent rbf most of our problems go away.
So every king, emperor or dictator is a fascist? All people submitting to every king, emperor or dictator is a fascist? I don't think so; fascism is a very particular kind of (often militaristic) authoritarianism that crops up under a very specific set of circumstances. Claiming otherwise robs the word of its meaning and gives freedom to label almost everyone that came before us in history a fascist. Sure, RBF is a disease, but it's not always fascism.
Yes, fascism is defined as the cooperation between corporations and gov't.
Much like what twitter/fedbook does when the gov't asks them to take down an account.
Clearly, any utopia that needs armed thugs to force people to comply with its mandates sucks, irrespective of how we label it.
Anybody that thinks it is ok to send armed thugs to force their will onto unwilling people is a fascist.
Rule by force is the disease.
Absent rbf most of our problems go away.
So every king, emperor or dictator is a fascist? All people submitting to every king, emperor or dictator is a fascist? I don't think so; fascism is a very particular kind of (often militaristic) authoritarianism that crops up under a very specific set of circumstances. Claiming otherwise robs the word of its meaning and gives freedom to label almost everyone that came before us in history a fascist. Sure, RBF is a disease, but it's not always fascism.
Yes, fascism is defined as the cooperation between corporations and gov't.
Much like what twitter/fedbook does when the gov't asks them to take down an account.
Clearly, any utopia that needs armed thugs to force people to comply with its mandates sucks, irrespective of how we label it.