I've been exposed to Stoicism mainly through a close friend of mine who studied it was well as many other religions. He has found his path in Buddhism with a great influence of Stoicism, or so it seems to me who has studied neither as fondly has he did and does. We're basically reading MA together, and his insights and background knowledge helps so much to understand the chapters more clearly. Which leads me to the conclusions that not only you're right stating that the other Stoics are worth reading, but on top it's necessary to read them all in order to understand. Or to be as lucky as I am and having a friend who already did that, and can explain all the little big meanings of words that have shifted over time.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: