As long as there are cities with over a million citizens, with no sim income there will be no good sim income for little players. Without tax of any kind I would be earning close to 300 sim a day. The luxury tax does not seem to be helping in penalizing 0sim income cities.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
how 0 sim income cities hurt SIM economy with no SIM to sell? You know that taxation and SIM price comes from cities making SIM and selling SIM. Possible that 0 SIM cities actually spend hive rewards from time to time to buy SIM and cards to keep high position in ranking. Long term, SIM cities spending SIM on building up should build faster than sellers, or even 0 sim cities.
SIM taxation is same for small and big cities. There is not that much difference between small and big players in terms of SIM ROI. But you can think about SIM price without taxation, just imagine where it could be. It's very important game self defense mechanism, was ignored by presidents for half year and 0% taxes, and now when people already made bank and selling more, income tax makes it super high tax. It's very hard to convince anyone that managing inflation is very important and we go from 0 - 70% - maybe short term 20% - and again 70%. Imagine all the SIM saved during half year of 0% tax if president would keep it 30%, maybe it would be still 30% till now. We just going from edge to edge, and people want more tokens to sell it for less hive...