Part 5/8:
This incident underscores a larger debate about the purpose of copyright enforcement. Should it be about protecting intellectual property or about maximizing the profitability and cultural relevance of artists’ work? The current approach appears to lean toward strict enforcement that, in many cases, may inadvertently suppress the very promotion needed to revive or sustain interest in older catalogs.
Furthermore, the creator points out that a significant portion of the audience consuming this content is young—predominantly between 25 and 34 years old—many unaware that the song predates their birth. Such exposure is invaluable for cultural preservation and artist legacy, yet the automatic removal policies hinder this rediscovery.