Part 3/8:
Eisenberg asserted that many of his arguments are unequivocally based on provable evidence. He conveyed how the structure of his findings and documentation has led to accusations against him of having a “mental illness,” an attack he attributed to Chandler during a contentious Zoom meeting. Eisenberg's insistence on empirical evidence is entwined with an emotional narrative of isolation within the truth-seeking community.
On February 22, he plans to issue a $5,000 debate challenge specifically targeting certain figures within the movement. This marks a turning point in his strategy, aiming to bring credible discussions into the light, contrasting his views with those critics who, in his opinion, lack substantial evidence.