Part 6/8:
The backlash against our discussion was notable. Some individuals expressed their disdain towards Dr. Wood, labeling her and me as tools of disinformation. Critiques centered on the perception that we failed to validate the claims being made about DEWs. These comments often contained personal attacks and questioned our expertise, despite a lack of substantial evidence to back their claims.
Simultaneously, a number of responses demonstrated an eagerness for rational understanding amidst the chaos. Some listeners appreciated the emphasis on critical discernment, encouraging the community to push beyond surface-level explanations and engage in constructive dialogues surrounding the fires.