Part 3/7:
Despite providing detailed evidence during their conversation, Gard home’s subsequent article failed to accurately reflect their discussion, instead, it painted a distorted picture of the author’s beliefs, intentionally excluding significant details like Neil Armstrong’s words and misleadingly characterizing the author's assertions. The author’s response to the article highlighted the omissions and the intention behind mainstream narratives, emphasizing the disparity between reported content and actual evidence. This incident serves as an exemplary case of how media can misrepresent facts while exercising selective reporting.