Part 4/9:
Jordan emphasized that Brennan’s responses appeared to be part of a broader pattern of dishonesty, citing a specific incident during a congressional hearing where Brennan allegedly lied about his involvement with the dossier. The committee also pointed out that during a recent deposition, Brennan again appeared to misrepresent facts, further cementing the case for potential perjury.
The Evidence and Pattern of Deception
The evidence against Brennan is compelling in the eyes of the committee. It includes the declassified report that Brennan himself authored, which explicitly authorized the dossier’s inclusion despite internal memos indicating concerns about its credibility. This discrepancy, Jordan argues, suggests that Brennan’s earlier denial of involvement was false.