Part 5/6:
This discussion underscores a critical point: while facial recognition technology can support law enforcement efforts, it should not replace thorough investigative procedures. Officers are encouraged to consider all available evidence—be it fingerprints, alibis, surveillance footage, or witness statements—rather than relying solely on facial recognition matches.
The acknowledgment of automation bias also emphasizes the need for training and protocols that encourage critical thinking. Officers must stay vigilant about their own cognitive biases and ensure that decisions are based on a comprehensive understanding of the case. Technology, when used appropriately, should serve as an aid rather than a definitive arbiter in criminal investigations.