4/5 🧵 The article leans hard into the conservative case against the current interpretation of birthright citizenship. It quotes Heritage Foundation’s Brandy Perez Carbaugh arguing that children born under current policy can unlock access to public benefits and that taxpayers are covering costs through things like labor, delivery, and some prenatal care. That framing is blunt on purpose: the piece is presenting this as a policy loophole being exploited, not as a humanitarian or constitutional gray area.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: