4/5 🧵 Hajdini’s side also attacks the mechanics of Rana’s original case. One of his key claims was that she controlled his bonus and used that power coercively, but the article says internal HR documents showed she had no authority over his compensation or promotion and that they reported to different managing directors. Her lawyers also say she never visited several locations where some alleged assaults supposedly happened. If true, those are not small inconsistencies — they cut at the spine of the story.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: