You just have a bunch of information that the old one is not right. So you don't have something to swing to. And until we get a new paradigm that comprehensively explains how the universe works from a quantum physics angle that everybody's comfortable with, nobody wants to let go of the framework they're currently hanging onto. What do you think? I mean, so we talked about simulation theory. It might sound ridiculous for me to put it forward, but actually I've put it forward in past on episodes on UAP because actually if you just wanted to just spitball stuff, the simulation hypothesis would actually solve the UAP conundrum. I think that's exactly it. Similarly, it would solve the 9-11 conundrum in this particular case. And I don't know that it's fair to call that a conundrum because I'm not a structural engineer. Maybe if I spoke to one, they would give me a good explanation for why building 7 was able to collapse that it's much more compelling than a broad conspiracy and rigging the (68/99)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: