know, from a Linux perspective, yes, there are lots of people who don't use ext4. However ext4 is probably the most popular file system type used on the average Linux system today. There are some older ones and there are some that are a little less stable. Not to say that they're all less stable, but some of the newer ones are a little less stable, arguably. So I see the logic in what they've done in support. If they're going to narrow it down and support only one file system type, ext4 is the one to choose because, you know, many of the Linux distributions for desktops at least choose ext4 by default. And if you want something different, you have to consciously go and choose that. You know, so it makes sense if they're going to narrow down their level of support for operating systems that for Linux they would choose ext4. Anybody that would just install it wouldn't really have to worry because that's the default. Right. Yeah, on the other hand, you know, if you're experimenting around (15/65)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: