an influx of capital. So if the United States decides to ban Bitcoin within its borders, and a lot of people own a lot of Bitcoin, they may decide, you know what, forget it, I'm just going to move to China. I don't care if it's not, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles, but I'll just, I'd rather be in China and I could be rich because I've got all my capital on the blockchain. I don't have any of it here. So I think that's also a plus for Bitcoin and for Ethereum, perhaps. Yeah, one way we've used to describe that concept is basically the world, in a world of multiple sovereign powers, it has to embrace the most credibly neutral monetary policies and monetary tools and even blockchain tools. And by credibly neutral, it just means the ones that none of the their competing rival nation states can actually control. So it's kind of the reason why we're very bullish on governance light type of protocols, where you can't really turn the dials and no one has complete control over it. (62/97)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: