I hate contracts. They drive me nuts. So I did pull out some interesting, you know, observations. But I think that the one that stuck out the most was actually not necessarily even in the agreement explicitly so much as it was. What's something that one of the authors of the bill said on Twitter, which was that at the end of the day, note operators are responsible for what transactions get processed on the network. And I thought that was very interesting. And I thought it was actually also accurate in the sense that if the government does want to regulate at all costs, let's say, Ethereum or Bitcoin, legally, they can make the argument, and they can make the argument to hold responsible the node operators in the same way that Napster held the government or whoever it was that was, I guess it would be the government, held responsible the computers that were doing the file sharing of music on Napster and the selective prosecution that came along with that. I thought that was one of the (85/97)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: