Network Effects and the Crypto Stigma: HIVE's Uphill Battle
TL;DR
Even if HIVE perfected onboarding and monetization tomorrow, it would still face two massive barriers: network effects (creators go where other creators already are) and crypto's reputation problem. Sometimes the best technology doesn't win - the technology with the most users does. This post explores why HIVE's technical advantages might not be enough.
What's Inside:
- Why creators follow other creators (not technology)
- The crypto reputation problem and why it matters
- How network effects create winner-take-all dynamics
- Some realistic thoughts on what HIVE could do
This is Part 3 of a series exploring why HIVE struggles to attract content creators. Read Part 1 and Part 2
A Note on Perspective
These articles aren't complaints about HIVE - I participate here and want to see it succeed. This is constructive analysis of real barriers to mainstream adoption. I might be wrong about some of this, and I'd welcome corrections from people who understand HIVE's growth strategy better than I do. The goal is honest discussion, not tearing anything down.
Creators Follow Creators, Not Technology
Here's something I've observed: when a creator decides where to post content, they rarely ask "which platform has the best technology?"
They ask: "Where are the other creators in my niche?"
Why?
- Collaboration opportunities - Guests for podcasts, video collaborations, joint projects
- Cross-promotion - Shoutouts, features, audience sharing
- Community and learning - Tips, trends, what's working
- Legitimacy - Being on the same platform as established names validates your choice
- Discoverability - Viewers browse platforms looking for multiple creators in a genre
This creates a chicken-and-egg problem that's nearly impossible to break:
- Creators won't join without other creators
- But other creators won't join without... other creators
HIVE has some great creators, but not enough critical mass in any single vertical to make it "the place to be" for that niche. You can't be a gaming creator on HIVE and expect to network with the gaming creator community - because they're all on YouTube and Twitch.
The Cold Start Problem
Every platform faces this, but most solve it in one of two ways:
Option 1: Massive Capital
Pay top creators huge sums to migrate and bring their audiences. Kick did this with streamers. Instagram Reels threw money at TikTokers. It works, but requires millions of dollars.
Option 2: Find an Underserved Niche
TikTok didn't compete with YouTube directly - they found Gen Z creating mobile-first short videos, a demographic YouTube wasn't serving well. Twitch focused on game streaming when YouTube was primarily pre-recorded content.
HIVE hasn't done either effectively:
- No massive war chest to poach established creators
- No clear niche where HIVE is obviously the best solution
What's HIVE's unique value proposition that would make a specific creator demographic say "that's the platform for me"? Decentralization and crypto rewards aren't compelling enough for most creators - they're features, not solutions to creator problems.
The Crypto Reputation Problem
Let's be blunt: "blockchain" and "crypto" carry significant negative baggage in mainstream culture.
The perception issues:
- Scams and rug pulls - Constant news about crypto scams creates guilt by association
- Volatility and risk - "I don't want to gamble, I want to create content"
- Complexity - "Blockchain" sounds technical and intimidating to non-tech people
- Environmental concerns - Many creators avoid crypto for climate reasons (even though HIVE is DPoS, not PoW)
- Political associations - Crypto has gotten tied up with certain political movements some creators want to avoid
For every creator intrigued by "decentralized social media," there are probably 10 who hear "crypto platform" and immediately tune out.
The audience problem:
It's not just creators - their audiences often share these concerns. A creator might personally be fine with crypto, but worry their audience will see them as "shilling" or getting involved in sketchy stuff.
I've seen creators explicitly avoid mentioning they're on HIVE in other spaces because they don't want the crypto association. That's a problem.
Winner-Take-All Dynamics
Social platforms exhibit strong network effects, which create winner-take-all or winner-take-most outcomes:
Why the biggest platform keeps winning:
- More users = More content
- More content = More viewers
- More viewers = More creators join
- More creators = More content
- (Repeat forever)
Breaking this cycle is incredibly hard. Even well-funded companies with great products struggle. Google+ had Google's resources and engineering talent - still failed against Facebook. Mixer had Microsoft's money and exclusive streamers - still failed against Twitch.
HIVE is trying to compete against platforms with:
- Billions of users
- Billions of dollars
- Decades of content
- Established creator communities
- Network effects working in their favor
That's not impossible to overcome, but it requires either:
- A massive competitive advantage (HIVE's advantages aren't obvious enough to most people)
- Serving a dramatically underserved niche (hasn't found one yet)
- A catastrophic failure by incumbents that creates an opening (hasn't happened)
Some Realistic Thoughts
Focus on a Specific Vertical
Instead of "decentralized social media for everyone," what if HIVE dapps focused intensely on one vertical?
"The best platform for [specific type of creator]" is more compelling than "a blockchain social media platform."
Examples:
- Long-form crypto analysis and commentary (already somewhat happening)
- Decentralization-focused creators who need censorship resistance
- Creators in countries with payment processing issues who need crypto payments
- Niche communities that value ownership and portability
Pick one, dominate it, then expand.
Embrace "Crypto-Native" as the Niche
Maybe fighting the crypto stigma is the wrong approach. Instead, lean into it. Be THE platform for crypto creators, blockchain projects, Web3 communities. That's a growing niche that actually values what HIVE offers.
Stop trying to attract mainstream YouTubers who don't care about decentralization. Attract the people who do.
Cross-Posting as a Trojan Horse
Make it trivially easy for creators to mirror content from YouTube/Twitter/etc to HIVE with zero effort. They keep their main platform, but also earn some extra HIVE rewards as a bonus.
This doesn't solve the network effects problem, but it builds content volume without requiring creators to "choose" HIVE.
Partner with Established Creators Authentically
Not "pay them to post" - that creates mercenary behavior. But genuinely solve a problem they have. Maybe a creator wants to own their content and audience data, or needs an uncensorable backup, or wants to experiment with tokenized communities.
Find creators who have a real reason to care about what HIVE offers, not just ones chasing a payment.
The Uncomfortable Truth
Here's what I keep coming back to: HIVE might be solving problems that most creators don't think they have.
Creators aren't generally worried about:
- Platform censorship (unless they're edgy/controversial)
- Decentralization (abstract concept, no immediate benefit)
- Blockchain technology (complexity, not a selling point)
- Token ownership (most creators just want cash)
They ARE worried about:
- Reaching an audience
- Making consistent income
- Growing their brand
- Creating better content
- Not wasting time on platforms that don't work
HIVE's value propositions don't map well to creator priorities. That's a fundamental problem that better UX alone won't fix.
Maybe HIVE isn't meant to be a mainstream creator platform. Maybe it's meant to be infrastructure for niche communities who specifically value decentralization. And that's okay - not every platform needs to be YouTube.
But if the goal is mainstream creator adoption, network effects and crypto stigma are massive headwinds that might be insurmountable without a major strategic shift.
Next in this series: We'll wrap up with a realistic look at HIVE's options - what could actually work given these constraints, and whether mainstream creator adoption is even the right goal.
What do you think? Have you seen HIVE succeed in any specific niche? Do you think the crypto stigma is overblown or a real barrier? What would it take for you to recommend HIVE to a creator friend? Let me know in the comments.
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:o4463xa3xqjd24u3ifjkkid5/post/3m6oyl3teus2n
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:o4463xa3xqjd24u3ifjkkid5/post/3m6oyl3teus2n
The rewards earned on this comment will go to the author of the blog post.
I think it's a smart post. Agree with many things.
It is. But there are also many people who want to join crypto but don't know how. Hive can be this, for people who are saying, "So many years, I want to learn crypto and start being part of this, but never could find the way". Signing up for Snapie app, for example, and posting "tweets" can be a thing for them - they get their first crypto wallet and earn first tokens. Not about getting rich soon but to acquire the identity of someone who is part of the big historical change.
This audience is the best. Experienced crypto guys are normally mercenaries (good word you found). Non-coiners believe crypto is cheating. But wanna-be-Web3-guys are the best. Many Hivers came to Hive from non-coinerhood :D
Non-English "chats" will help as well. There are many wanna-be-web3-guys who just can't speak English well enough.
Developed niche communities can help with onboarding. Reddit has developed niche communities. And even there some people feel "Reddit street photography community sucks. But where to go?"
Hive has this advantage - the wallet system, with them creating contests is easy. Beginning photographers love the idea of winning a contest - weekly, monthly, yearly. It alone can make an app with millions of users. How to compete with IG? No need. People can have IG and be part of Hive contest app.
So... there are many ways and no need to always think about fighting against major social media - better to start with smaller steps.