I mean disagree all you want: you're wrong.
Everyone knows that injecting money into a struggling economy can help to dig it out of the hole.
It's basic economics. Uncontested. The only argument to be make is whether or not it is sustainable or more akin to giving a crack addict more crack so they can push off the pain to a later date. The legacy economy has a bad track record. Crypto can do better, as it is much more agile and precise.
You are under the impression that inflation gets printed all at once, it does not.
If today I have 30% yields, and I jack inflation up 100% and create 60% yields, guess what?
Those yields are measured year over year.
Speculation prices in the increase immediately.
They want the higher yields.
Demand increases, but supply is exactly the same on day one.
Did I really not explain this well enough the first time?
I guess it's a good thing that no one is attuned to these concepts.
Just need to get back to building my own token so I can prove it in the field.
In fiat, inflation is debt.
In crypto, inflation is an investment.
There is no argument.
If we get a positive return on the investment, we can continue printing money forever and never have our currency devalued. Why is this such a difficult concept to understand? It's a mathematical fact. The only argument to be made is if the investments we are making are worth it or not. Stick to the issues that actually need contribution. Stop arguing with facts. Facts are facts. If the network prints a million tokens, but generates twice as much value, we can print money forever. Seriously I don't get why this is such a hard concept to understand, but clearly you are not the only one to have a knee-jerk reaction to these claims. As stated in the original post, your aversion to inflation, like the rest of us, stems from centralized corrupt allocations that leech value away from the citizens. That's not what we are talking about here... at all.