Direct from the desk of Dane Williams.
Trusted overseas regulated brokers offer a realm of possibilities for US traders.
So why are they trapped using only the 3 MT4 brokers regulated in the US and aren’t allowed to trade with them?
I’m not even American and it does my head in.
Now I’m not saying that the role of reputable regulatory bodies such as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) should be understated.
These regulatory bodies are known for their stringent rules that prioritise client protection and ensure the safety of the business environment.
This level of oversight and accountability is crucial in preventing scams and providing a secure space for traders to operate.
But in so many respects, allowing US traders to access brokers regulated by these esteemed bodies seems like such a logical step.
The FCA and ASIC are renowned for their commitment to maintaining fair and transparent practices within the financial industry.
Their regulations are designed to instil trust among clients and to promote a level playing field for brokers.
An emphasis on client protection is particularly noteworthy.
Trusted regulatory bodies place a strong emphasis on preventing fraud and ensuring that brokers are held accountable for their actions.
This includes measures to safeguard clients' funds, strict financial reporting requirements and regular audits.
In case of disputes or grievances, clients have a recourse mechanism through these regulatory bodies.
This level of consumer protection ensures that you are not left vulnerable to unscrupulous practices.
But as I spoke about yesterday, the scarcity of US regulated MT4 brokers is indeed a point of concern.
The MetaTrader 4 (MT4) platform is widely used and appreciated by retail forex traders around the world.
The fact that there are only three US regulated MT4 brokers–that are considered substandard compared to global counterparts–raises questions about the competitiveness and quality of trading options available to US forex traders.
It's a situation that certainly doesn't align with the US's reputation as a financial hub and a beacon of innovation.
The acceptance of this current state as adequate is mind boggling.
I’ve been in the forex broker game for over 10 years now and when I first started, I simply assumed it would rectify itself.
But here we are a decade later and nothing has changed.
The United States is a global leader in various industries and its financial sector is no exception.
In my opinion, an easy solution is to give US traders access to brokers that match the standards set by other reputable regulatory bodies worldwide.
But the only ones that can allow that are their own regulatory bodies.
The lack of options do inadvertently limit traders' choices, affecting their ability to engage in the global market effectively.
By granting US traders access to trusted overseas regulated brokers, the market could see increased diversity and competition.
This would naturally drive brokers to improve their offerings to stay relevant.
The current situation could indeed be viewed as an opportunity for growth and transformation, rather than a status quo that's simply accepted.
Just to reiterate, my opinion is that the notion of allowing US traders to utilise trusted overseas regulated brokers, under the oversight of esteemed bodies like the FCA and ASIC, holds significant merit.
The emphasis on client protection, business transparency and accountability would benefit both US based traders and the industry as a whole.
Addressing the shortage of competitive US regulated MT4 brokers is vital to uphold the reputation of the US financial sector.
It's time to reevaluate the current state of affairs and strive for a trading environment that truly reflects the excellence that the US is known for.
Best of probabilities to you.
Posted Using LeoFinance Alpha
I didn't realize that it was that bad in the US but I agree. Do the oversea brokers just refuse US traders?
Yep, because the regulatory bodies like the FCA and ASIC don't want to risk legal action from the US.
It's funny because what happens is that the majority of brokers have a 'list of countries that they don't accept clients from' and the list reads like:
Esteemed company there!
I thought they're allowed to do that in US.
Man, it's really worse in my country our Government keep sending us SMS every couple of months reminding to not use forex platform especially overseas - it's illegal or smth.
Instead of regulating they're just cutting the way..
Yeah, but like you here... you just use foreign, unregulated or decentralised exchanges to trade.
That's the reality of making normal things like this "illegal".
that's what everyone do and they came up with lame excuse and say Billions of dollars laundered through these apps. Lmao, why not regulate and make it transparent instead of crying over those things.
You've made some excellent points here, Dane. The forex trading landscape in the US certainly appears to be in need of diversification and improved competitiveness.
Access to trusted overseas regulated brokers, under the watchful eye of regulatory bodies like the FCA and ASIC, could indeed offer a solution that benefits both traders and the industry as a whole.
It's essential to prioritize client protection and accountability while also fostering a more innovative and dynamic trading environment. Here's to hoping for positive changes in the future!
I wouldn't hold my breath.
It honestly feels like the US is getting more insular and strict with their financial regulations.
Just sucks for the people.
!PIZZA
$PIZZA slices delivered:
@tin.aung.soe(2/10) tipped @forexbrokr