A sad reality in crypto is the belief that anything with real utility only rises because of coordinated, paid shilling. That's largely because many projects rely on paid promotion to get noticed.
A sad reality in crypto is the belief that anything with real utility only rises because of coordinated, paid shilling. That's largely because many projects rely on paid promotion to get noticed.
Fair points... organic communities and long uptime really matter.
Yeah, organic growth is way more sustainable than hype cycles that fizzle out.
Litecoin has a first-mover advantage. Fourteen years of dedicated, organic users can't be replicated—not by paying influencers, botting metrics, or buying media hype.
Litecoin is blue-collar and upfront, not a pre-mined, treasury-pumped token.
People in this space who speak positively about it generally fall into three categories:
Those are the incentives for talking about Litecoin.
Some financially incentivize themselves by promoting after investing or by funneling followers to third-party monetization.
Others spot a trend and post to gain followers and attention.
Some people act for one or two of these reasons; when motivations are 2 or 3, promotion usually fades as attention moves on. Those acting for reason 1 are the die-hards—the true believers in what Litecoin was, is, and will be.
When weighing voices, give the most weight to that first group.