I don't see technology as evil in the slightest.
I see the higher echelons of large hive stakeholders as 'evil'.
Evil = using power to silence opinion.
Evil = Using power to control others.
Evil = Having power, and then standing by and watching oppression take place - without doing anything about it. (i.e...spineless cowards).
Evil = Gas lighting.
Evil = collectivist/authoritarian/technocratic mindsets.
You might not agree with how the military industrial complex works - but if you head off to work at ratheon every day and collect a paycheck off them - you're feeding the beast still.
If you leave ratheon, you starve the beast of your labor/talent.
For the moment, though, I sincerely believe I am right where I need to be and doing what I need to be doing.
Ok, fair enough.
I sincerely think that you're incorrect, personally.
(See how we can disagree without downvoting ?) lol
Okay, I misinterpreted what you were saying.
Part of our disagreement may be mostly semantic. I almost never use the term 'evil' to describe other human beings. There is genuine evil in the world, and there are genuinely evil people in the world. But most of the people who do bad things are (imho) deceived (by the 'evil one') and misguided, more so than being outright 'evil' in and of themselves.
The term "evil" in my mind is reserved for heinous actions like abusing children and killing babies.
I personally don't "see the higher echelons of large hive stakeholders as 'evil'."
There are a few who are sociopathic to the point of likely deserving the 'evil' label, but only a scant few (again, according to my definition of 'evil', which is likely different from yours).
So, when it comes to your list of "EVIL = " statements, I agree that those actions are 'bad', but they don't rise to my definition of 'evil'.