Why @leo.voter isn't voting ?

in LeoFinance3 years ago

Hi everyone !

100per.jpg

Few days ago, I didn't have enough time to post and curate everyday. That's why, I delegated my HP and most of my Hive engine Tokens. That way nothing was lost.

I delegated around 1 300 HP to @leo.voter and that was granting me around 0.5 Leo daily and I was totally happy with this !

Know I undelegated most of it but I realized something when I made a post and have been upvoted by this account. The upvote value in $ of hive was around $1.5, I wanted to know what is the value of a 100% upvote from @leo.voter ?

image.png

I have my answer $71.455, that's pretty huge !

But I looked just under that line and saw something that destabilized me.

Voting mana : 100.00%

And, that is often like that. Each time I'm going to see, I never saw it under 97%.
Now I'm really questioning myself, why not voting more ? Because there is a lot of lost value here if the upvote are wasted.


Maybe someone have the reason and there is something really clear about that, but I did not find it.

Maybe that's because this account is really looking for a specific kind of content and only upvotes this. But when I see that, I'm even wondering how is the account able to pay the Leo dividends to delegators if they are not earning so much curation rewards.

image.png

When you see this screenshot, you could say there's a lot of votes, but with 12% each that does not even make 2 100% upvotes, in more than 24 hours. So more than eight 100% upvotes are wasted.

You can also see there are only 6 account upvoted on while there are 15 upvotes. I know most of them and know that they content is totally qualitative, even Taskmaster4450 when he does like 4 posts per day.
untitled.gif

But I'm sure a lot of other creators are doing great finance content on the platform ! (and on this one I'm not talking of myself, I'm mostly talking of finance only to say how I made some money and not really a good review or something else)

The account should be distributing way more upvotes per day, even if some are 5% for little posts that are still interesting, maybe following a trail. But I really think that shouldn't be wasted that way.

If there is an obvious reason that I'm missing, don't hesitate to correct me and say my post is trash and I should do more research 😅 But I hope I'm right and there could be something to fix that problem !

Noises.png

You can join me on :
Noise.cash
The microbloging platform and get rewarded with BCH
read.cash.png
On :
read.cash
Rewarding your posts with tips in BCH too.
p0x.png
Also on :
Publish0x
That rewards both readers and authors with ETH and ERC-20 tokens
HoneyGain.png
Share your unused bandwidth and get paid for that with Honey gain

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Sort:  

Have you check if they pay out leo now? They didn't last week because the account was dried and hadn't been refilled x)

The poster is not talking about the LEO been paid out or not,what the poster is talking about is that alot of voting power by @leo.voter is wasting away as the account is not upvoting much...


Posted via proofofbrain.io

He did also rise the question of how are they going to payout dividends if the xuration is so little. not sure if you read the post or not

Yes, those are basically the two main questions of the post. Why so many voting mana is wasted and if so many curation rewards are lost, how can they buy the LEO they pay daily to delegators :)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

I'm still receiving my rewards !

And one week ago when I did not receive enything for 3 days, everything came together, just a little smaller than expected

Hmm fair :D
I undelegated after not recieve anything for 3 days :D

I know it is easy to fall into the 'we need more whale votes' trap when you are new here, but here is the math of what happens when whales vote what they have.
https://peakd.com/utopian-io/@paulag/the-impact-of-unused-steempower-on-the-rewards-pool-blockchain-business-intelligence

If anything, we need more restraint from the whales.

I'm not sure to understand everything behind it. But I have few hints.

Tell me if I'm wrong

If the whales were all voting their ten 100% votes everyday, each upvotes (from whales or any other users) would be divided because there is only a number of Hives to be given as rewards everyday ?

Or at least something like that ?

That would explain few things !!

I'm not really new here, I have a little more that a year old on Hive. I'm not really looking for whales' votes (I would appreciate them though), I'm already really happy to have around $1 each time I post ! :)

Thank you for your answer and for the link ! Really instructive and it shows that I'll still need to learn more about the blockchain :')

The more rshares pulling from the pool, the less to go around.
When a large account votes, many small accounts fall off the tail.
It is better for the many when the whales don't give all the inflation to the few.

I thought they had curators?

Maybe, I don't know :')

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

This is a really interesting perspective, the more it votes, more curation rewards it will generate and it can offer good returns to its delegators. May be due to the fall in prices, they are trying to curtail the supply of leo tokens in the market.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Congratulations @ykretz! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You distributed more than 11000 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 12000 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Check out the last post from @hivebuzz:

Hive Tour Update - Account creation and Account Recovery steps
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!

But I'm sure a lot of other creators are doing great finance content on the platform ! (and on this one I'm not talking of myself, I'm mostly talking of finance only to say how I made some money and not really a good review or something else)
The account should be distributing way more upvotes per day, even if some are 5% for little posts that are still interesting, maybe following a trail. But I really think that shouldn't be wasted that way.
If there is an obvious reason that I'm missing, don't hesitate to correct me and say my post is trash and I should do more research 😅 But I hope I'm right and there could be something to fix that problem !

There are alot of wonderful contents on the platform and i believe that leo.voter should upvote all those wonderful contents,or maybe there is another added criteria that @leo.voter uses to determine the upvotes.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Yes ! I understand they want to rewards finance content, but there is a lot of great finance content, enough to give the 10 100% upvotes daily

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

That is true,its better they start giving upvotes to those contents that deserve it and they should not allow those voting power to stay idle..


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Thank you @ykretz, for using the CO2 Compensation Coin (COCO / SWAP.COCO) on Steem-Engine or on Hive-Engine to reduce your CO2 footprint. You want to join? Buy some COCO / SWAP.COCO and transfer them to CO2Fund's account @co2fund.